Jump to content

Featured Replies

Essendon is by far the hardest club to deal with at the trade table

I am confident we can get 2 first round picks by the end of the trade period

I do want to retain or better pick 6 though

Wouldnt even mind an extra early first rounder in next years draft

Melksham IMO would be in our best 22

 

Is there a connection between the competitive edge and inside knowledge that a club gains when we pick up a player from an opposing side.

Take Crossy and Bernie last year and those game results against their old Clubs. Surely Melksham would be of distinct benefit as well.

Yeah, spot on willmoy. It took me awhile to get my head around drafting him but there's no doubt he can add to the list, particularly if he can recapture his 2013 form. Bernie and Crossy showed that it's certainly possible.

A fit player, can run and kick both feet.

A steal at 25, what would you get at 25 in this years draft?

A player not looking down the barrel of a 2 year WADA ban.

 

Essendon is by far the hardest club to deal with at the trade table

I am confident we can get 2 first round picks by the end of the trade period

I do want to retain or better pick 6 though

Wouldnt even mind an extra early first rounder in next years draft

Melksham IMO would be in our best 22

Could Howe possibly get us this? Probably not but, by all reports, next year has a number of promising mids.

A view shared by Leigh Matthews.

Given how out of touch with the game Matthews is, I wouldn't take any solace from his views aligning with mine.


Imagine the uproar if you traded for a 1st round pick in next years draft and the club you trade with implodes and finished last, would be hilarious

Imagine the uproar if you traded for a 1st round pick in next years draft and the club you trade with implodes and finished last, would be hilarious

Recruiters should be looking for those opportunities, because it will happen, there will be a few teams who don't perform up to expectations. I think Adelaide and North would be 2 sides I'd be trying to pry a 2016 first rounder out of.

My Essendon friend just laughed at me over the trade.

It's been a long time since he's had any reason to laugh. I don't like it.

 

Can't wait nut job.

I hadn't even noticed this until I saw your highlight.

What am I meant to be saying and about whom ?

It's not official yet so it is probably waiting on other trades we are doing to lock down what pick it will actually be. No need to panic.


I hadn't even noticed this until I saw your highlight.

What am I meant to be saying and about whom ?

Who knows Pro Dee.

It's not official yet so it is probably waiting on other trades we are doing to lock down what pick it will actually be. No need to panic.

No need to panic even if it is our second round pick.

No need to panic even if it is our second round pick.

No need to panic until WADA finds him guilty.

No need to panic even if it is our second round pick.

Exactly, and as supporters there's not much we can do if we don't like it.

No need to panic until WADA finds him guilty.

Don't worry. I'm sure Robbo can write mindless articles on our behalf if we put him on our payroll.


The pick is a roll of a the dice, it always is. Thats not my concern.

If it is indeed a 4 years contract - then that is an issue. That is a massive risk for a guy that hasnt been a solid contribute to a pretty average outfit for the last 2 years. This isnt even taking into account the whole wada fiasco.

Could go either way, but at this stage, im not impressed at all.

The pick is a roll of a the dice, it always is. Thats not my concern.

If it is indeed a 4 years contract - then that is an issue. That is a massive risk for a guy that hasnt been a solid contribute to a pretty average outfit for the last 2 years. This isnt even taking into account the whole wada fiasco.

Could go either way, but at this stage, im not impressed at all.

As someone mentioned earlier, it's a punt. And if he fires four years is a masterstroke. Of course, there is the opposite.

The pick is a roll of a the dice, it always is. Thats not my concern.

If it is indeed a 4 years contract - then that is an issue. That is a massive risk for a guy that hasnt been a solid contribute to a pretty average outfit for the last 2 years. This isnt even taking into account the whole wada fiasco.

Could go either way, but at this stage, im not impressed at all.

By all accounts no other team would touch the contract we're prepared to pay him. We could just as easily have gotten him for free in the PSD.

As someone mentioned earlier, it's a punt. And if he fires four years is a masterstroke. Of course, there is the opposite.

But why 4 years and why for such a decent pick?

Was there any legitimate interest in him outside us?

By all accounts no other team would touch the contract we're prepared to pay him. We could just as easily have gotten him for free in the PSD.

By all accounts? Please provide a link to just on account of a reputable football who has stated that view


And your one of the biggest waste of oxygen thiefs on here but everyone already knew that.

Now [censored] off back to that hole you crawled out of chimp

Gutless keyboard hero

Essendon is by far the hardest club to deal with at the trade table

I am confident we can get 2 first round picks by the end of the trade period

I do want to retain or better pick 6 though

Wouldnt even mind an extra early first rounder in next years draft

Melksham IMO would be in our best 22

We haven't had to much to do with Essendon in the last few years. Apart from Scully we've done well with GWS Hogan, Tyson hopfully Frost and Bugg .

Gutless keyboard hero

That's an analysis joeboy would be proud of...

 

I'm really not sure what to make of this deal. He's certainly a tough kid. I doubt he can be called soft although I haven't made a habit of watching Essendon games. It's just that his name isn't one that you think of when you go looking for quality players in the league. We could find that he turns into a hard running midfield workhorse who can kick goals and win his own ball, in which case we'll look back and declare this a genius move. On the other hand he could wind up being an easily distracted thug who throws his weight around on the field but plays the man instead of the ball and costs us games with his low possession count and stupid free kicks. I think I'll stay on the fence and wait to see how it turns out.

That's an analysis joeboy would be proud of...

He would be proud. Unfortunately the nutjob who wrote it isn't something to write home about it though..


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies