just gonna throw it out there!!!

i read on Facebook somewhere that J.P Kennedy was unhappy with pay cuts or whatever it was... Now GNF being all cryptic..

my precidition is picks 3, 10 (or 12) and a player for J.P Kennedy....

would love a PM if I'm close to the mark... will not spill any beans if notified..

Dreaming.

Lol you guys think this forum is so influential that it can stop a trade going through?

Anyone else worried that article mentioned North Melbourne and Harry Lumumba have been in talks over the weekend and theres a fair chance he could end up at the Roos??

That would complicate things somewhat unless we ditched talking with Geelong and offered Mitch to the Pies as a straight swap!

Omg if we get Kennedy I'll cry. He is my favourite AFL player.

Doubt it though.

As I said a massive game of chess. The end results are far certain.

Our likely trade partner comes in black and white but is not a little bird.

Hmm perhaps our likely trade partner likes to eat little birds though.

Cats come in black and white.

The more i think about it, the more Dan Hannebery ticks GNF's boxes.

Can't be DH. Roos has a no DH policy

Hiw old is Kennedy? Doubt he is worth as much as some suggestions.

Omg if we get Kennedy I'll cry. He is my favourite AFL player.

Doubt it though.

If it is, indeed, Sydney, it will be Hannebery or Kennedy imo. They're the only two that really make sense.

Mitchell doesn't instantly become our 'best player' if we get him. Parker would almost certainly be untouchable after the year he's had. Only other two who would potentially become our best player would be McVeigh or Jack, but as co-captains you'd have to doubt they would be involved.

Can't be DH. Roos has a no DH policy

Thing of the past.

It's been a long day. The 'DH' reference only just clicked. Forgive me

How has black and white ended up being Sydney and two untouchable players? God bless Demonland.

Hiw old is Kennedy? Doubt he is worth as much as some suggestions.

25 and would be worth every penny. Star

Dixon's way too injury prone to be given any consideration whatsoever.

In his 4 years at the Suns he's played just 10, 12, 13 and 14 games.

And he's not very good.

How has black and white ended up being Sydney and two untouchable players? God bless Demonland.

Ok so I'm explaining it again.

"Comes in black and white, and is not a little bird". Already said no to Port Adelaide (the B&W connection)...Swans come in black or white, and are not little birds.

The player/s being discussed would become "our best player/s instantaneously". It all depends on how well you trust GNF, but this is the most sensible conclusion from his hints.

Edited October 12, 201411 yr by Guest

How has black and white ended up being Sydney and two untouchable players? God bless Demonland.

The swan is either black or white..

Ok so I'm explaining it again.

"Comes in black and white, and is not a little bird". Already said no to Port Adelaide (the B&W connection)...Swans come in black or white, and are not little birds.

The player/s being discussed would become "our best player/s instantaneously". It all depends on how well you trust GNF, but this is the most sensible conclusion from his hints.

Sorry, but I had to laugh at this. It's actually a very good attempt but for some reason it made me laugh

How could it be Hannebery or kennedy? Swans have just signed buddy and Tippet, are in the middle of their premiership window, have dibs on the most rounded mid in the draft both this year and a ripper next year. But are going to trade out either their best mid in kennedy, or a player touted as a future captain in Hannebery?

I wish it to be true but seems unlikely

Plus Malceski leaving would free up some cap.

Its Gary Rohan. Pick 2,3 & 23 should get it does. At least he runs real good

The swan is either black or white..

Well GnF said black and white. Not black or white. So there is that....

25 and would be worth every penny. Star

He's 27 halfway through next season.

Sorry, but I had to laugh at this. It's actually a very good attempt but for some reason it made me laugh

Mate, if you could give me a hand with working out GNF's cryptic messages, I'm all ears.

That's just what I came up with. I'm obsessing over this far too much.

Great, so I've gone from refreshing the paddy Dangerfield thread to this one...

Better tell the boss she has to work twice as hard next week.

Well GnF said black and white. Not black or white. So there is that....

"Comes in black and white". Swans come in black, and white. Simply a slight grammar misrepresentation on my part

I have a feeling that if GNF spills the beans on this one he'll never get info ever again...

I've been both involved in trade week and privy to trade information in the past.

The concept of putting anything on DL was abhorrent.

Well GnF said black and white. Not black or white. So there is that....

I am just having fun with this..

But he says it comes in black and white...it works, eagles come in black and white also.

He's 27 halfway through next season.

So he is, good pickup.

I'm still sticking to my original prediction of Hannebery, fwiw.

I am just having fun with this..

But he says it comes in black and white...it works, eagles come in black and white also.

I struggle to think of any Eagles players better than Nathan Jones.

inb4 someone says "that brownlow guy!"