Jump to content

GOODBYE MITCH CLARK

Featured Replies

There was on a comment on Mitch's instagram saying something along the lines of...'You will look good in bulldogs next year'. But that comment has since been deleted...mean something? lol

 

Perhaps should of seen it coming after the way he exited Brisbane. He's got the bulk share of his cash. Not bad for 15 games.

My blood is boiling over this. What a disgraceful betrayal it would be. Will have turned his name to mud at two clubs and effectively the AFL at large.

Jaded is correct in that it's best to take a breather before all the facts are out in the open, but it is looking very ominous.

Couldn't find any info on his manager Colin Young, which is about right for a slimy bloke that operates like he does

Did find this thread from 2009 though, titled 'Colin Young -The AFL's Worst Player Manager'

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/colin-young-the-afls-worst-player-manager.617013/

Cheers.

Classic thread title. Can't say I'm not surprised, I wasn't expecting much of a manager.

 

I can't see Roos going along with some kind of false story related to Mitch's "retirement", although everyone was extremely coy about what was wrong with Mitch at the time.

Did any official MFC source ever confirm that it was clinical depression, or was that assumed?


 

Couldn't find any info on his manager Colin Young, which is about right for a slimy bloke that operates like he does

Did find this thread from 2009 though, titled 'Colin Young -The AFL's Worst Player Manager'

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/colin-young-the-afls-worst-player-manager.617013/

Yeah, if Clark's intentions are to try to do right by the Melbourne Football Club, then he needs to have a very serious word with his manager about letting a story run out and wild like this. Not good for Mitch and it is already harming the club.

Would you prefer we hand over your IP address if your comments are taken as potentially libelous?

I didn't post the rumour DL.

What I posted was actually a fact.

Sorry if this has been covered before but

Just watched Damien B segment on Sunday Footy Show http://www.jump-in.com.au/show/aflsundayfootyshow/videos/3771174125001/ then reading the articles

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-09-07/clark-may-return-to-footy & http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-09-07/dees-want-say-on-clark and I realised that there is a lot of gaps in the reporting. A lot of conjecture and rumours the only quote is from his manager that says

"It is more than likely he will put his hand up and attempt to get back into the AFL," Young told Channel Nine in a statement on Sunday. From the MFC all we are getting is

"This decision by Mitch to investigate the potential of returning to play AFL is something we would expect Mitch to discuss with us," Demons football manager Josh Mahoney said in a statement.

Se really we know no more then Mitch wants to return to Football.

Oh and then there is this from GNF so make of it what you will.

Grand New Flag, on 29 Jul 2014 - 3:56 PM, said:

I confirm everything that I have earlier said in this thread several months back. The prospect of 11 remains in play. PJ, PR and the club will say nothing and even go as far as playing games to keep people off the trail as the chance of success is stronger if the pressure on him remains low. I was recently told the move back to Perth was partly to ensure that he did not attract this attention and thus pressure. It was also to give him time away from everything to continue his recovery and to give him time to assess what he wanted.

Clark has not given up the dream of playing senior football for Melbourne again. He has been training on a Misson derived program in Perth. He must first prove a minimum level of mental and physical fitness, he must then prove the desire to return is strong enough. His pending return to Melbourne is a very good sign and he will now start to slowly ramp up training, but don't get carried away, Clark still has a long way to go.

Like Frawley that club just don't know whether he will or will not be on the list next year.

If he plays again it will only be for the Dees.

Didn't both Damo and Ralph say they asked his manager directly and were told Mitch wasn't interested in returning to the Dees?


I didn't post the rumour DL.

I know but you quoted it and your comment was speaking about it so it had to be deleted. I'm not opening up myself to any legal actions your posts and others might make. Please respect that or you will no longer be able to use the forum. That goes for everyone. Just because you are anonymous doesn't mean you can break the law. I will have no issues with handing over your ip addresses. Rule of thumb, if you wouldn't post something using your real name in a public forum then don't post it.

Didn't both Damo and Ralph say they asked his manager directly and were told Mitch wasn't interested in returning to the Dees?

Not sure about Ralph but Damo IIRC was only speculating on Sunday footy Show (I might rewatch the video) jic.

Regardless, the rumour is out there now and gained plenty of momentum. Mitch is aware of this and has thus far said nothing to refute it or reassure people.

Compare it to how Swan came out within hours of the Buckley argument rumours to debunk it. If Mitch's sole intention is to return to the Dees, it only takes one tweet to make that clear.

Regardless, the rumour is out there now and gained plenty of momentum. Mitch is aware of this and has thus far said nothing to refute it or reassure people.

Compare it to how Swan came out within hours of the Buckley argument rumours to debunk it. If Mitch's sole intention is to return to the Dees, it only takes one tweet to make that clear.

Mitch playing on or playing on at the Dees was not the rumour deleted. If that were the case then this entire thread would have been deleted. It was much more sinister than that and whether true or not has no place to be discussed here.

Not sure about Ralph but Damo IIRC was only speculating in on Sunday footy Show (I might rewatch the video) jic.

Damo + Speculation. It doesn't get much better than that.

My thoughts. IF Clark wanted to make a comeback and IF the MFC wanted him, Roo's and PJ would make it happen. If he plays next season and it's not for us, it may even be the doing of the MFC.

Our list has been unstable and under achieving for so long. Clark COULD be too much of a risk to the plans PJ and Co have in place for the future of the MFC.

Others may think he's worth the risk. I'm unsure.


Didn't both Damo and Ralph say they asked his manager directly and were told Mitch wasn't interested in returning to the Dees?

If you are posting on here anything about Clark without knowing the definitive answer to that question yourself than FMD? I think I'll just leave it at that

We shouldn't jump to conclusions, just be patient, Mitch has suffered from a terrible illness.

Let's just give this guy the benefit of the doubt until we know otherwise.

Mitch playing on or playing on at the Dees was not the rumour deleted. If that were the case then this entire thread would have been deleted. It was much more sinister than that and whether true or not has no place to be discussed here.

Was referring to the main rumour of Mitch only wanting to play for a contending club, not the other rumour (which seemed fanciful to me).

 

We shouldn't jump to conclusions, just be patient, Mitch has suffered from a terrible illness.

Let's just give this guy the benefit of the doubt until we know otherwise.

That's makes way too much sense!

How can we work ourselves into a frenzy acting like that?!

If you are posting on here anything about Clark without knowing the definitive answer to that question yourself than FMD? I think I'll just leave it at that

As Mitch himself responded on the now infamous Instagram thread (to Leoncelli I am assuming), "I wasn't aware that I had made an anouncement. @****** don't comment on things you know nothing about". I think that was a very fair response and he would obviously NOT come out with some sort of a statement there to refute anything... I would hae thought that would be done on advice... despite what some mightsay Swan did.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: UWS Giants

    The Casey Demons took on an undefeated UWS Giants outfit at their own home ground on a beautiful autumn day but found themselves completely out of their depth going down by 53 points against a well-drilled and fair superior combination. Despite having 15 AFL listed players at their disposal - far more than in their earlier matches this season - the Demons were never really in the game and suffered their second defeat in a row after their bright start to the season when they drew with the Kangaroos, beat the Suns and matched the Cats for most of the day on their own dung heap at Corio Bay. The Giants were a different proposition altogether. They had a very slight wind advantage in the opening quarter but were too quick off the mark for the Demons, tearing the game apart by the half way mark of the term when they kicked the first five goals with clean and direct football.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Richmond

    The Dees are back at the MCG on Thursday for the annual blockbuster ANZAC Eve game against the Tigers. Can the Demons win back to back games for the first time since Rounds 17 & 18 last season? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 79 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Fremantle

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on TUESDAY, 22nd April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons first win for the year against the Dockers. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 27 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Fremantle

    A undermanned Dees showed some heart and desperation to put the Fremantle Dockers to the sword as they claimed their first victory for the season winning by 10 points at the MCG.

      • Like
    • 402 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Fremantle

    Max Gawn is leading the Demonland Player of the Year award from Christian Petracca followed by Ed Langdon, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes for our first victory for the season. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 51 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Fremantle

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons return to the MCG wounded, undermanned and desperate. Still searching for their first win of the season, Melbourne faces a daunting task against the Fremantle Dockers. With key pillars missing at both ends of the ground, the Dees must find a way to rise above the adversity and ignite their season before it slips way beyond reach. Will today be the spark that turns it all around, or are we staring down the barrel of a 0–6 start?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 634 replies
    Demonland