Jump to content

"Judge us after 5 rounds"

Darbsy
Darbsy
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

  On 24/04/2014 at 14:01, Curry & Beer said:

really? you're happy with that as a result?

besides, I was merely pointing out that your dressing-up of our opponents so far was farcical, GC and Carlton absolute rubbish on the day, GWS still cellar-dwellars and StK for the bottom 5 or so, despite beating Essendon. To get one win from that lot plus a demolition is NOT what I and many others deem satisfactory

You're expectations are ridiculous and, quite frankly, childish given where we're coming from.

We've seen some improvement already and there'll be more by end of year.

Both PJ and Roos have talked about the improvement being in our percentage. I'll listen to either of them (and pretty much everyone else) about footy before I listen to you.

  • Quote
    •  

    Improvement has come in that our players have only rolled over for a full four quarters once this season. Would have been multiple if not five times by round 5 in previous years. However, they are still rolling over for decent chunks of most matches which is baffling. The one confidence I have is that with Roos speaking at quarter breaks after our atrocious quarters he generally seems to be able to conjure an improved effort. Still to this day can't work out why the players themselves haven't resolved to be desperate for four quarters each week given that effort is the non negotiable at all other AFL clubs and really should be the easiest part for a team short on high level talent to execute. What it means is that the most important attribute of the successor is that he will need to be an excellent motivator (which the better coaches are anyway).

    Our tackling numbers and quality have been disappointing.

    I still don't feel like our players play with true intent to compete and win at every contest. I reckon a lot of members of our team kind of hope they'll win their contests instead of being desperate to win them.

  • Quote
      On 23/04/2014 at 22:24, Cudi_420 said:

    Why should we "genuinely have won"? Let's call a spade a spade, shall we?

    I suggest you watch each of those games again. And then watch every single game that we played last year.

    And, cop a tip, I understand that we didn't actually win either of those games given that the scoreboard at the end of the game tends to reflect the winner and the loser.

    We deserved to win the Saints game and didn't. We didn't deserve to win the Suns game and didn't.

    I maintain however that we should have won each of these games.

    On any construction, that's an improvement from last year.

  • Quote
    •  
      On 24/04/2014 at 14:01, Curry & Beer said:

    really? you're happy with that as a result?

    besides, I was merely pointing out that your dressing-up of our opponents so far was farcical, GC and Carlton absolute rubbish on the day, GWS still cellar-dwellars and StK for the bottom 5 or so, despite beating Essendon. To get one win from that lot plus a demolition is NOT what I and many others deem satisfactory

    Have you actually watched any Demons games over the past few years? Do you understand where this club is coming from?

    The answer is Ground Zero. Our midfield last year was considered the weakest fielded by any club in VFL/AFL history. It was deplorable.

    We've come a mile under Roos. A country mile.

  • Quote

    I am with P-Man on this. At the moment, I would give it a fail compared to where the rest of the AFL are at right now. From our perspective and where we are at, it's a pass but just a pass as the improvement is there but it is slow.
    Then again, maybe it will be slow as hopefully this is a genuine rebuild. I want to believe that this is a complete overhaul of an entire club, it's ethos and philosophies not just a painting over of all the mental fragility and soft underbelly that has defined the club for the last 50 odd years by replacing the playing personnel. The former task will take a lot long that the latter.

    Maybe some of the frustration lies with what Roosy has said from the very start? He never came out and made outlandish boasts as in years gone past. It's always been moving away from being a 2 win 50 percentage team (the second stat more damning than the first) and setting minimum standards. There has been no talk of dynasties or premierships to tide over the faithful. Just talk of improving where we are at now. This can be good and bad as making those kind of claims can buy you some time as it gets the supporter base thinking about the future but it can go pear shaped just as quickly if you don't deliver on said outrageous claims.

  • Quote

    I don't understand how people can be so disappointed with the season so far.

    We're not very good. We all know that. We're a bottom 4 side.

    But how could you not have expected this? How could anyone who is a Melbourne supporter have expected us, knowing full well what happened to us in 2012-2013, to come out in 2014 and be winning games regularly?

    Whilst we've lost games to weaker sides, the unfortunate reality of what is happening at this club is that we are not a guarantee to be beating anyone, Hawthorn or Brisbane. We are in the process of improving this club, a club that is coming from effectively VFL standard.

    So, to be able to say after five rounds that we could have won four of them is a positive, IMO a big one. Over the last two years how many times have we been able to say that? 10? Less?

    Some will say 'that's just accepting mediocrity'. No it isn't. No one is saying 'this will do, thanks Roosy, you can go now'. If you acknowledge that this is an early stage, not the end stage, in our path up the ladder, then you realise that this is about right for us.

  • Quote
      On 24/04/2014 at 01:56, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Swans will be difficult but not out of the realms of possibility, I'm writing off any SA games for now, Dogs & Tigers both very winnable.

    Agree mostly although the Swans seemed to get their grunt back last week

  • Quote
      On 24/04/2014 at 14:12, stuie said:

    You're expectations are ridiculous and, quite frankly, childish given where we're coming from.

    We've seen some improvement already and there'll be more by end of year.

    Both PJ and Roos have talked about the improvement being in our percentage. I'll listen to either of them (and pretty much everyone else) about footy before I listen to you.

    Roos talked about our percentage representing our improvement but so far Stuie we have played majority bottom half sides and our percentage sits at 69.3% so you have no facts to back you up. What C&B says is true you just don't want to accept that.
  • Quote
    •  
      On 24/04/2014 at 22:28, Ron Burgundy said:

    Have you actually watched any Demons games over the past few years? Do you understand where this club is coming from?

    The answer is Ground Zero. Our midfield last year was considered the weakest fielded by any club in VFL/AFL history. It was deplorable.

    We've come a mile under Roos. A country mile.

    And watch if we get beaten over the next 5 rounds and we will see the same "tough love" given out just like Neeld did. Not much has changed so far apart from a slightly better list, agreed? Neeld didn't have Dawes for the first half of last year, and didn't have Frawley for part of it, and in their place had James Sellar and Jack Fitzpatrick.
  • Quote
      On 24/04/2014 at 22:07, Ron Burgundy said:

    I suggest you watch each of those games again. And then watch every single game that we played last year.

    And, cop a tip, I understand that we didn't actually win either of those games given that the scoreboard at the end of the game tends to reflect the winner and the loser.

    We deserved to win the Saints game and didn't. We didn't deserve to win the Suns game and didn't.

    I maintain however that we should have won each of these games.

    On any construction, that's an improvement from last year.

    "We deserved to win the Saints game and didn't"

    Garbage.

    The Saints were far more deserving because they took their chances and made the most of them.

    Would we have won with Dawes, Clark and Hogen in the side? Perhaps. But on the day, the team did not "deserve" to win. They COULD have won, but they didn't.

  • Quote

      On 25/04/2014 at 06:43, titan_uranus said:

    I don't understand how people can be so disappointed with the season so far.

    We're not very good. We all know that. We're a bottom 4 side.

    But how could you not have expected this? How could anyone who is a Melbourne supporter have expected us, knowing full well what happened to us in 2012-2013, to come out in 2014 and be winning games regularly?

    Whilst we've lost games to weaker sides, the unfortunate reality of what is happening at this club is that we are not a guarantee to be beating anyone, Hawthorn or Brisbane. We are in the process of improving this club, a club that is coming from effectively VFL standard.

    So, to be able to say after five rounds that we could have won four of them is a positive, IMO a big one. Over the last two years how many times have we been able to say that? 10? Less?

    Some will say 'that's just accepting mediocrity'. No it isn't. No one is saying 'this will do, thanks Roosy, you can go now'. If you acknowledge that this is an early stage, not the end stage, in our path up the ladder, then you realise that this is about right for us.

    Looking at the positives in our performances is one way to go, but unfortunately t.u the numbers tell a different story!!
  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 10:56, Cudi_420 said:

    "We deserved to win the Saints game and didn't"

    Garbage.

    The Saints were far more deserving because they took their chances and made the most of them.

    Would we have won with Dawes, Clark and Hogen in the side? Perhaps. But on the day, the team did not "deserve" to win. They COULD have won, but they didn't.

    And we would have been thumped if the had Hayes, Steven, Montagna etc etc etc etc
  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 10:49, J VINEY FAN said:

    Roos talked about our percentage representing our improvement but so far Stuie we have played majority bottom half sides and our percentage sits at 69.3% so you have no facts to back you up. What C&B says is true you just don't want to accept that.

    It's always going to take a team with so many new players to gel. If you honestly have not seen any improvement from last year then give up talking about footy. Do you think the West Coast game had a big influence on that percentage? You know, West Coast who a lot of experts tipped to finish top 4? It's not as cut and dry as you basic thinkers want it to be.

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 10:53, J VINEY FAN said:

    And watch if we get beaten over the next 5 rounds and we will see the same "tough love" given out just like Neeld did. Not much has changed so far apart from a slightly better list, agreed? Neeld didn't have Dawes for the first half of last year, and didn't have Frawley for part of it, and in their place had James Sellar and Jack Fitzpatrick.

    FMD. So Neeld is as good as Roos hey? Neeld was responsible for bringing Sellar, so I'd hardly be using him as an excuse. He also brought over Rodan, Byrnes, Pedersen, Gillies... things are getting REALLY silly here if posters are starting to make excuses for Neeld and trying to say the coaching is of the same standard now.

  • Quote

      On 25/04/2014 at 10:58, J VINEY FAN said:

    Looking at the positives in our performances is one way to go, but unfortunately t.u the numbers tell a different story!!

    No they don't. Gold Coast beat us by 10 goals at the G last year.

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 10:53, J VINEY FAN said:

    Not much has changed so far apart from a slightly better list, agreed?

    I don't think I've ever agreed with a single thing you've said.

    No, not agreed. Complete disagreement in fact.

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 10:49, J VINEY FAN said:

    Roos talked about our percentage representing our improvement but so far Stuie we have played majority bottom half sides and our percentage sits at 69.3% so you have no facts to back you up. What C&B says is true you just don't want to accept that.

    Funy, I just looked at the ladder and West Coast and Saints are both top 8, GCS is 9th... if Roos had all of Dawes, Hogan and Clark from the opening round, the scenario would be very different. To say we are failing is flawed as the game plan obviously cannot work to full effect with a major part of it missing... as was evidenced in the improvement upon Dawes return.

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 12:48, stuie said:

    No they don't. Gold Coast beat us by 10 goals at the G last year.

    They beat us last year and they beat us this year, let's be honest the scoreboard flattered us last week.
  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 12:49, P-man said:

    I don't think I've ever agreed with a single thing you've said.

    No, not agreed. Complete disagreement in fact.

    Ok but the list has changed for the better with the addition of Tyson, Cross,Vince and Georgiou these players have contributed much to our improvement. I think Neeld would of had more success if he had the current list.
  • Quote

      On 25/04/2014 at 14:21, hardtack said:

    Funy, I just looked at the ladder and West Coast and Saints are both top 8, GCS is 9th... if Roos had all of Dawes, Hogan and Clark from the opening round, the scenario would be very different. To say we are failing is flawed as the game plan obviously cannot work to full effect with a major part of it missing... as was evidenced in the improvement upon Dawes return.

    Ok so GC and West Coast might make the 8 but St K, Carlton and GWS will be lucky none of which are serious contenders for the flag this year.

    If you are saying Roos' game plan is flawed without the injured players, then imagine how Neeld felt because he rarely had either Clark, Dawes and Hogan wasn't their either.

    And FFS St Kilda almost had their entire midfield out in round 1, but they still managed to implement a game plan.

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 12:33, stuie said:

    FMD. So Neeld is as good as Roos hey? Neeld was responsible for bringing Sellar, so I'd hardly be using him as an excuse. He also brought over Rodan, Byrnes, Pedersen, Gillies... things are getting REALLY silly here if posters are starting to make excuses for Neeld and trying to say the coaching is of the same standard now.

    Byrnes and Pederson are in the team tomorrow so why would you highlight them?

    And I never said Neeld is as good as Roos, alright stuie. You just said that. So go and FYD

  • Quote
      On 24/04/2014 at 04:25, stuie said:

    Righto, and what are OUR odds for the flag and what does that tell you?

    Maybe concentrate on logic more next time instead of insults.

    our odds are based on how we perform you goose, haha
  • Quote
    •  

    We have improved on last year.

    We have been decimated by injuries, which doesn't do our results justice.

    Our recruiting has been better than the Neeld years.

    We were set back 10 years under Neeld and you can't expect to come back within 5 rounds.

    I think we should go to the footy and watch some of the players and note their improvement.

    Then at the end of the year when Roos has culled the list of players he wants out, we should again look forward to Round 5 - 2015

  • Quote
      On 25/04/2014 at 16:18, J VINEY FAN said:

    They beat us last year and they beat us this year, let's be honest the scoreboard flattered us last week.

    Why do you have Daniel Ricciardo in your avatar? He's had as many posium finishes this year as he did last year when he wasn't with Red Bull...

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Clap
      • 460 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Like
      • 120 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All