Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Name your rookie prospect

Featured Replies

Now the draft is over, we can probably better assess our needs when it comes to rookies. Whilst I'm no talent watcher so not going to give predictions on who we might pick up I would think of the 4 picks we have - 2 might go on tall defenders, 1 on another small forward and the other either on a raw mid or ruck project.

Any thoughts on what type of players we need?

 

Now the draft is over, we can probably better assess our needs when it comes to rookies. Whilst I'm no talent watcher so not going to give predictions on who we might pick up I would think of the 4 picks we have - 2 might go on tall defenders, 1 on another small forward and the other either on a raw mid or ruck project.

Any thoughts on what type of players we need?

I seem to have lost the "Like" button, but I agree with all that.

  • Author

Now the draft is over, we can probably better assess our needs when it comes to rookies. Whilst I'm no talent watcher so not going to give predictions on who we might pick up I would think of the 4 picks we have - 2 might go on tall defenders, 1 on another small forward and the other either on a raw mid or ruck project.

Any thoughts on what type of players we need?

Agree developing a ruck and key defender (just 1 I don't see the need for 2) makes sense. With plenty of main list spots likely to open up in 12 months time there's opportunity for a rookie to get 24 months to show what he can do without too much rush.

Best available as well for most of it would still be kept in mind. With 3 smaller players and not a large amount of talls taken there is bound to be 1 or 2 bigger guys on the recruiters minds going in to the rookie draft.

I'd still keep Jetta in mind for the final pick. I know he's a bit of a list clogger and the worry is he just can't bring it to AFL level but he has agility and the natural physical instincts with tackling. If he's presented to preseason in good shape I'd like to see 1 more year of him just in case.

 

I seem to have lost the "Like" button, but I agree with all that.

I think everybody has lost their like button for some reason. i too liked the scenario.

  • Author

I like the idea of Matt Sully (Geel VF) or Fraser Fort (Geel Falcons) as key defenders

Wouldn't be surprised if Roos takes a punt of one of his big american ruck proteges he had at Sydney.

Maginess and Tsitas might be my two favourite midfielders left. Both of them just find the ball very well and could over come doubts on physical attributes by sheer talent.


I like the idea of Matt Sully (Geel VF) or Fraser Fort (Geel Falcons) as key defenders

Wouldn't be surprised if Roos takes a punt of one of his big american ruck proteges he had at Sydney.

Maginess and Tsitas might be my two favourite midfielders left. Both of them just find the ball very well and could over come doubts on physical attributes by sheer talent.

I agree Re: Fort and Sully. We need another key defender on the list who can develop at Casey for the next couple of seasons. Does anyone know what their disposal is like? All of the reviews I can find only mention they're good at one on one situations.

Maybe Mitch Thorpe, do we have a PSD pick?

Only if we delist Nicho who is the only player out of contract.

 

only if we delist nicho who is the only player out of contract

Not a difficult decision for me dc

DC

Isn't it too late to delist any more players?

I thought you had to lodge final lists prior to the draft to give the players the opportunity of nominating.


DC

Isn't it too late to delist any more players?

I thought you had to lodge final lists prior to the draft to give the players the opportunity of nominating.

I'm only presuming he can be Robbie because he is still ooc.

Someone else maybe able to confirm or otherwise.

Google didn't help me.

Only if we delist Nicho who is the only player out of contract.

Is he really? I know this article (http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2012-10-31/dees-elevate-nicholson-evans-) doesn't have any details of his contract length, but given the amount of wacky contractual deals that Neeld did (and that his co-elevatee is still contracted) I just guessed that he got two years.

If this is true... chop!

Pick 2 a KPD: Alex Spencer (Sandringham Dragons), Fraser Fort (Geelong Falcons) or Matthew Sully (Geelong VFL)

Pick 20 a midfielder/half forward: Jake Best (Casey), Chris Cain (Port Melbourne), Alex Spina (North Adelaide) or William Maginess (Oakleigh Chargers)

Pick 38 a ruckman: Darcy Cameron (Claremont), Darcy Fort (Werribee), Josh Miller (Glenelg), Fraser Thurlow (Labrador) or Ben Mabon (North Melbourne Kangaroos)

Pick 56 a KPF: Khan Haretuku (Frankston), Andrew Algin (Woodville West Torrens), Mitch Thorp (South Launceston) or Aaron Cornelius (Brisbane Lions)


Bit left field here, but I wonder if with 3 established ruckmen next year and another just added, plus another I think on their list, would the Dockers see Hannath as surplus. If we still wanted him and if they don't, we could do a deal with the Dockers to delist him, on the basis we PSD or rookie him and take up his contract payment.

Then again if we don't want him or they do, it's all over.

Nicholson could be delisted and taken back as a rookie if we wanted to use our PSD pick, which I hope we do, if there is a better player available.

  • Author

Bit left field here, but I wonder if with 3 established ruckmen next year and another just added, plus another I think on their list, would the Dockers see Hannath as surplus. If we still wanted him and if they don't, we could do a deal with the Dockers to delist him, on the basis we PSD or rookie him and take up his contract payment.

Then again if we don't want him or they do, it's all over.

Nicholson could be delisted and taken back as a rookie if we wanted to use our PSD pick, which I hope we do, if there is a better player available.

Bit too far left field redleg.

If Nicholson was to be delisted and re-rookied it would've been done by now I guess. My tip is we dont want a PSD pick.

And the Dockers will want Hannath. Apeness will be developed as a forward/ruck. Hannath will be the long term back up behind Zac Clarke. Sandilands will be 31 in a months time and Griffin 28 and coming off a knee injury. They have full ruck stocks but they aren't exactly overflowing.

Bit too far left field redleg.

If Nicholson was to be delisted and re-rookied it would've been done by now I guess. My tip is we dont want a PSD pick.

And the Dockers will want Hannath. Apeness will be developed as a forward/ruck. Hannath will be the long term back up behind Zac Clarke. Sandilands will be 31 in a months time and Griffin 28 and coming off a knee injury. They have full ruck stocks but they aren't exactly overflowing.

I am prepared to bet, that if we surrender PSD pick 2 to the Pies, whoever they take, will be better than Nicholson.

As for Hannath, it was a thought.

You would think with that physique and height and the added maturity he has gained with age and coaching, not to mention his footy this year, he would be worth a punt as a rookie. Not much to lose.

Pick 2 a KPD: Alex Spencer (Sandringham Dragons), Fraser Fort (Geelong Falcons) or Matthew Sully (Geelong VFL)

Pick 20 a midfielder/half forward: Jake Best (Casey), Chris Cain (Port Melbourne), Alex Spina (North Adelaide) or William Maginess (Oakleigh Chargers)

Pick 38 a ruckman: Darcy Cameron (Claremont), Darcy Fort (Werribee), Josh Miller (Glenelg), Fraser Thurlow (Labrador) or Ben Mabon (North Melbourne Kangaroos)

Pick 56 a KPF: Khan Haretuku (Frankston), Andrew Algin (Woodville West Torrens), Mitch Thorp (South Launceston) or Aaron Cornelius (Brisbane Lions)

I'd love to see jake best rookie listed!! Looked better than half of our listed players in the vfl last year.. Would be a waste to see him go to another club, considering he knows all the boys now..


it would be a shame to waste our premier position in the PSD and miss a chance to get a jump on those other teams still willing to take psd's instead of rookies. Nicho onto the rookie list would still keep him at the club but also put him on notice that he needs to improve to stay.

Posted on another thread, Darcy Hourigan looks ok, big lad 192 and 92kgs, has a great boot good awareness good hands can play back or forward, what's not to like. Was expected to go in the ND but missed out. Needs to get a bit more aerobic capacity but that shouldn't be a problem if he gets a good pre season.

  • Author

it would be a shame to waste our premier position in the PSD and miss a chance to get a jump on those other teams still willing to take psd's instead of rookies. Nicho onto the rookie list would still keep him at the club but also put him on notice that he needs to improve to stay.

You think Nicholson doesn't already know it? What do you expect him to run faster this preseason. I'd be all for demoting him but if you are to do it you do it before not now. As for our premier position in the PSD it's a myth, we are already down to taking a smoky in Hunt in the ND.

Posted on another thread, Darcy Hourigan looks ok, big lad 192 and 92kgs, has a great boot good awareness good hands can play back or forward, what's not to like. Was expected to go in the ND but missed out. Needs to get a bit more aerobic capacity but that shouldn't be a problem if he gets a good pre season.

What's not to like is that lack of athleticism isn't just limited to fitness. He's a bit short and too slow for AFL. Looks like he'll be a star at State level but I've seen nothing to show he would translate it to AFL. Some kids are just a bit short and solid for AFL these days.

 

You think Nicholson doesn't already know it? What do you expect him to run faster this preseason. I'd be all for demoting him but if you are to do it you do it before not now. As for our premier position in the PSD it's a myth, we are already down to taking a smoky in Hunt in the ND.

What's not to like is that lack of athleticism isn't just limited to fitness. He's a bit short and too slow for AFL. Looks like he'll be a star at State level but I've seen nothing to show he would translate it to AFL. Some kids are just a bit short and solid for AFL these days.

He's the same size as Darling and reminds me a bit of him. As a forward he probably doesn't have to be all that quick and he looks strong enough to hold his own in a contest.

Have a look at his highlights and he knows where the goals are and is a very strong mark, not too bad on the ground either.

You think Nicholson doesn't already know it? What do you expect him to run faster this preseason. I'd be all for demoting him but if you are to do it you do it before not now. As for our premier position in the PSD it's a myth, we are already down to taking a smoky in Hunt in the ND.

What's not to like is that lack of athleticism isn't just limited to fitness. He's a bit short and too slow for AFL. Looks like he'll be a star at State level but I've seen nothing to show he would translate it to AFL. Some kids are just a bit short and solid for AFL these days.

I am sure nicholson knows what melbourne is doing and if they are keeping him on then the club obviously sees some potential in him, but given the lack of realisation of that potential in AFL games they may well move him back to a rookie. i would be surprised if they had not already discussed their plans for with him (whatever they are), as there is no benefit for the club to hold onto him so long if their intention was to delist him so late without taking him back as this would seriously penalise his chances of training with or being picked up by another team. Such treatment of a players would not go down well with the rest of the team.

As for picking a smoky in Hunt, they obviously see something in him to take him above 50 or more other would be draftees, that does not make him a poor choice or mean the players after him are poor, MFC just rates him higher than the others and melbourne preferred to take him in the draft rather than risk of loosing him. We have 4 rookie slots open which we are probably going to fill, as such getting as many early picks will allow us greater choice. if we dont participate in the PSD and other teams will get first crack of the players in the draft, therefore reducing the talent pool we have to eventually choose from.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 01

    With Opening Round done and dusted, Round 1 sees the full AFL competition finally swing into action for 2026. Discuss all the games this week that do not involve the Dees, share your tips, and let us know which results would suit Demons best.

      • Sad
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: 2026 Season Preview

    The boys previewed the 2026 Season sharing their early impressions of the new coach, the new players, observations from preseason training, and what they've made of the new game style. They also look ahead to the season with their predictions, the players they expect to rise, their expectations for the team, and what they see as a realistic pass mark for Melbourne in 2026.

    • 14 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    When the Demons blew their 46-point lead at Marvel Stadium in Round 20 last year, the fallout was enormous. Like an event straight out of a Shakespearean tragedy, Melbourne’s final-quarter collapse left fans reeling and the club grappling with the aftermath. 

    • 10 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    With just over two weeks until their opening match of the 2026 AFL Premiership season, the Demons are already well on the path to redemption and have the Saints firmly in their sights ahead of their mid-March clash at the MCG. What do you think the team will look like when they run out on to the G?

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 620 replies
  • NON-MFC: 2026 Opening Round

    Finally the 2026 AFL Premiership Season is upon us. While Melbourne sits out Opening Round, there is still plenty of footy to enjoy with five non-MFC clashes to kick off the new season. It all begins on Thursday night with a blockbuster at the SCG as Sydney hosts Carlton in what should be a strong early test for both sides. On Friday night, Gold Coast gets its chance to open the season in front of a home crowd when the Suns and Christian Petracca take on Geelong at People First Stadium. Saturday features a double-header, starting in the afternoon with Greater Western Sydney and Clayton Oliver meeting the Hawks at Engie Stadium. That is followed on Saturday night by Brisbane Lions hosting the Western Bulldogs at the Gabba, with the Lions embarking on their campaign to win the Threepeat. Opening Round wraps up on Sunday night at the MCG, where St Kilda takes on Collingwood in the only game in town in the first week of the season. There is no shortage of storylines across the round, so discuss all the action from the non-MFC games of Opening Round.

      • Haha
    • 557 replies
  • REPORT: Richmond

    Mars is not usually a place known for lighting strikes but on Friday evening it happened twice in the vicinity of the stadium in Ballarat that carries the name and is a half completed building site with limited capacity for spectators.

    • 4 replies

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.