Jump to content

Wonder what PAUL ROOS is up to these days???

Featured Replies

 

I simply can not stand the dragon lisp lady.

I've said it before, Matt Thompson is the epitome of AFL journos – he’s a fatty who seems to have gained his footy 'pedigree' from sitting on the couch all weekend watching every game with beer and pie in hand.

Easy. That's my footy pedigree too ;)

 

any here reckon this report is true? he'll be our coach.

Im actually pretty sceptical but never the less interested.

Neeld has not been here for 7 years......He has been here for 1 and a 1/4......He took on a basket case and stated when he first arrived that it would take 3 years to even resemble an AFL side......He also brought in one of the people that is accredited for StKilda's three grand final appearances......Many here think he should go now.....but very few can tell me who will replace him and the football dept...1/4 through the year....Will you be yelling for the next coach to be sacked when he loses the first 5 games next year???Think a bit long term....and not instant success.......

You know exactly what the 7 years is referring too. It was not humanly possible to go backwards after 186. We have gone along way back in Neelds stint thus far. I repeat he can not coach and is killing our club rapidly. Who will replace him? Chocko Williams jumps to mind, Paul Roo's, Bomber Thompson. Gee what have these blokes got in common? Think long term you say! FFS.

any here reckon this report is true? he'll be our coach.

The fact that there is a report in my opinion is actually a good thing. Those interested will actually put their people in contact with our people and we'll start to create demand, and get a real feel for what's out there.

And our current coach will feel the pressure of this reporting and hopefully fight for his job by doing his best to make us as competitive as possible by year end.

Who loses? I hope this is the powers that be at the MFC getting on the front foot for once.

I simply can not stand the dragon lisp lady.

Can't stand her or not, everything she said in the video clip is true.

I feel sorry for both Bailey and Neeld, they were/are responsible for attempting to do the almost impossible, in trying to turn the fortunes of the MFC around. Not even the best of coaches would seemingly be able to do that.

Can't stand her or not, everything she said in the video clip is true.

I feel sorry for both Bailey and Neeld, they were/are responsible for attempting to do the almost impossible, in trying to turn the fortunes of the MFC around. Not even the best of coaches would seemingly be able to do that.

I agree, Paul Roos on his own couldn't do a thing with this club, Paul roos, jackson, new assistants and so on potentially could.

Having said that, Mark Neeld may well be on the right track

 

Just a question regarding this topic, If this is true, and for example we sacked Mark Neeld this week, could Paul Roos take over this year or would he have to wait until seasons end?

Just a question regarding this topic, If this is true, and for example we sacked Mark Neeld this week, could Paul Roos take over this year or would he have to wait until seasons end?

Theoretically we could, but it seems unlikely. 2013 is already over for us and most potential coaches have contracts with other clubs or media outlets they'd need to fulfill.

If we are going this poorly with 4-6 weeks to go I'd think we might move to a stand in coach so that the Football world knows the job is open. If the club has any foresight their plan could be in place by then anyways. They'd only need to sack a coach if the supporter angst grew to a deafening level before year end in that case.


If we are going to secure a competent and capable coach I would expect at the very least that he would want to know who the CEO he would be working with and understand the outcome of Jackson's review of the club and what the AFL intends to do in respect of the Club and the Board to address these matters

Any coach not establishing the disposition of these issues is unbelievably naive and will likely go the same way as his predecessors.

If we are going to secure a competent and capable coach I would expect at the very least that he would want to know who the CEO he would be working with and understand the outcome of Jackson's review of the club and what the AFL intends to do in respect of the Club and the Board to address these matters

Any coach not establishing the disposition of these issues is unbelievably naive and will likely go the same way as his predecessors.

Or they may already know who is going to take over RR. You just never know what happens behind closed doors.

If we don't at least inquire about his services and ask what it would take to get him on board, then our administration should give themselves an uppercut.

It costs nothing to ask, and you just never know your luck. If all it takes is money, or getting rid of certain people around the club, then bloody hell get it done.

I would also hope we chat to Williams, Eade and anyone else who we might think is worth while.

And FFS, stop listening to Gary Lyon!!!!!!!!

I agree to an extent but anything that happens must happen with Mark Neeld being treated with at least some respect. I'm getting tired of people at the club getting treated like rubbish.

I don't think you can sack someone "nicely"

Brisbane's announcement is in a way a comment on this whole debate. they have obviously canvassed the same risks as we are thinking about - and their position is not as dire as ours. Not to say they are right, but they must feel they have done their due diligence. interesting to see how it pans out for them.


Brisbane's announcement is in a way a comment on this whole debate. they have obviously canvassed the same risks as we are thinking about - and their position is not as dire as ours. Not to say they are right, but they must feel they have done their due diligence. interesting to see how it pans out for them.

And they will be all over Paul Roos too.

the MFC cant be caught napping once again.

This will be Voss's fifth year......Vs .....Neeld 1 and 1/4....just saying....

This will be Voss's fifth year......Vs .....Neeld 1 and 1/4....just saying....

Neeld is in a deep hole - far deeper than Voss. Question is, is he digging, or filling it in?

The thing i find interesting is if Roos or any other coach comes in and we improve from next year on, is that a reflection on us being impatient because Neeld said 2014 from the start, or is that a reflection on his inability to coach?

I can't see Neeld lasting the year out, then next year you potentially add a couple of free agents, jesse hogan and a priority draft pick to our list, as well as a full pre season and out best 22 on the park, get a fully fit, dawes, clark, trengove, grimes, and so on and add them to our team

I think Neeld has set a very solid foundation for him or our next coach to work with.

Does anyone seriously think that Roos or any other experienced coach for that matter would be interested in going to a club that sacks a succession of coaches mid contract?

Is he / are they masochists?


Does anyone seriously think that Roos or any other experienced coach for that matter would be interested in going to a club that sacks a succession of coaches mid contract?

Is he / are they masochists?

if the club hired more experienced coaches i doubt they would need to be sacked with such regularity.

Pure logic i know!

Don't worry fellow Demonlanders the dees will find a way NOT to get Roos and he will end up at Brisbane cause that's what the Dees are good at.

Based on past experience it wouldn't surprise me if we chose another untried coach and that Mr I'm to Busy in the Media is on the selection panel.

God help us if the above comes to fruition.

Don't worry fellow Demonlanders the dees will find a way NOT to get Roos and he will end up at Brisbane cause that's what the Dees are good at.

Based on past experience it wouldn't surprise me if we chose another untried coach and that Mr I'm to Busy in the Media is on the selection panel.

God help us if the above comes to fruition.

I need a drink or 5.

 

What did Brisbane do? out of the loop abit it seems

What did Brisbane do? out of the loop abit it seems

It's been reported that Vossy has 2 months to prove himself after that who knows what will happen.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
    • 47 replies