Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

 
  • Author
16 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

Disgraceful by WJ, in trying to trick innocent folk into uttering a banned name.

 

 
  • Author
28 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Ok … fill in the blank

________ and Trengove are two names that have appeared on the playing list of Port Adelaide.

I was thinking Adelaide when I said Fogarty.

But to more important matters, you have breached our standards twice in one day and you are hereby banned from this thread for 32 minutes.


  • Author
51 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

… and the answer is “Boak”.

You have breached your ban. Add another 9 minutes.

Edited by Redleg

23 hours ago, daisycutter said:

what;s happened to the lads, uncle, you haven't mentioned them for ages?

did they all succumb to covid?

or have you eaten them all?

concerned dc

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

  • Author
10 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

That is sad news.  Maybe a trip to the forest is in order, to find a couple of possums to have as new pets.

I know the manor isn’t air conditioned, so hopefully the maid has a big fan to keep you cool on this very hot day

.

 
18 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

Tom Scully the 2nd

  • Author
13 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Tom Scully the 2nd

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.


2 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

21 minutes ago, old dee said:

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

OD did you really mean an illuminating sentence?

Edited by ManDee
Bit of lite humour!

4 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

  • Author
1 hour ago, demosaw said:

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

On 12/27/2022 at 4:13 PM, Redleg said:

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

Must be the Christmas spirit from you Mr Leg. I think you are weakening in your advancing years. 


On 12/27/2022 at 9:53 AM, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

  • Author
52 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

Have a safe and  happy New Year and please don’t mention that name again, as over 1115 pages of 1.2m views and thousands of posters have managed to refrain from doing.

Now back to my spearmint and camomile tea.

Edited by Redleg

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

  • Author
1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

It gets better after interval.

4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

I’m going with seriously deranged.


red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

  • Author
21 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

33 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

 
  • Author
39 minutes ago, old dee said:

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

Yes indeed OD.

22 hours ago, Redleg said:

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 10

    The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Like
    • 137 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 11 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
      • Shocked
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 284 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 53 replies
    Demonland