Jump to content

Tom McNamara

Featured Replies

Posted

Always thought the kid had talent and very good awareness.

Maybe he has found his niche.

He's got a long way to go and spots in the Dee's midfield are tough to get, but we may see him earn a spot in the second half of the season if he keeps progressing.

Good luck to the kid.

From the Casey reserves report.

*Tom McNamara: Tom was probably best-on-ground, playing as a midfielder, which is a new role to him. He had about 30 possessions and kicked three goals, so that was really promising. He’ll put himself right in contention to be promoted on that performance.

 

Always thought the kid had talent and very good awareness.

Maybe he has found his niche.

He's got a long way to go and spots in the Dee's midfield are tough to get, but we may see him earn a spot in the second half of the season if he keeps progressing.

Good luck to the kid.

From the Casey reserves report.

*Tom McNamara: Tom was probably best-on-ground, playing as a midfielder, which is a new role to him. He had about 30 possessions and kicked three goals, so that was really promising. He’ll put himself right in contention to be promoted on that performance.

Surely if he can keep up that form, he would be in the 22 in no time.

For the Casey reserves... maybe if he was doing that every week in the seniors

 

For the Casey reserves... maybe if he was doing that every week in the seniors

Exactly what I thought.

For the Casey reserves... maybe if he was doing that every week in the seniors

Try a bit of optimism, the thing I like about our much maligned Footy Dept they are thinking outside of the square, Tom has had am onjury riddled couple of years, coming back again from a fott injury, we have tall defenders let's try something new.....a case in point Rohan Bail....injury riddled first year and a bit...now in Best 22...watch this space


Try a bit of optimism, the thing I like about our much maligned Footy Dept they are thinking outside of the square, Tom has had am onjury riddled couple of years, coming back again from a fott injury, we have tall defenders let's try something new.....a case in point Rohan Bail....injury riddled first year and a bit...now in Best 22...watch this space

rhaz wasn't suggesting it was bad that the football department is playing Tom Mc as a mid - that's a strawman.

What rhaz - and I - were pointing out is that form was displayed in the seconds. He'll need to improve his form to maintain t he same output of disposals/goals.

  • 1 month later...

rhaz wasn't suggesting it was bad that the football department is playing Tom Mc as a mid - that's a strawman.

What rhaz - and I - were pointing out is that form was displayed in the seconds. He'll need to improve his form to maintain t he same output of disposals/goals.

A post from a few months ago, Tom Mac again looking like he is progressing after the weekend, all this from a Footy Dept that is failing at every hurdle according to some

For the Casey reserves... maybe if he was doing that every week in the seniors

Am I missing something here.

He played in Casey seniors and has for some time!

 

Am I missing something here.

He played in Casey seniors and has for some time!

Look at the date of the posts.

Tommy Mac has had a few games where he has been very very good at VFL level, but to my knowledge they are few and far between.

He still has time, but I see him being more like Nick Lower who is now succeeding at Freo after not coming on quickly enough at Port.


Been going along very nicely at Casey young Tom. Seen him play several times recently and what I like is his grunt and approach at the footy. Runs very straight. Seems to work well with McDonald and Davis.

Look at the date of the posts.

I did see that but I am still lost not sure what the relevance is.

But don't worry i will probably get it later today.

I have always, and still do, see an AFL player in TMac. Might be too late for him to make something at Melbourne, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was rookie-listed by another club and make a career somewhere else.

I'll be totally honest and say I see more in TMac than I do in Maric.

Go ahead.

Still time for young Tom. He's big and strong and is becomming effective. Like em like that. Reminds me of Hawthorn when they were mongrels. Good on ya Tom keep it up we've got plenty of smalls, a number of ( most of ) whom need to pull their finger out.


I have always, and still do, see an AFL player in TMac. Might be too late for him to make something at Melbourne, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was rookie-listed by another club and made a career somewhere else.

I've always felt the exact same thing. His 3 AFL games in '09 were promising. I rated him ahead of Cheney, on talent, when he was at the club, and felt like he was wrongly being groomed as a tall defender when he really just wasn't big enough for it. Always was a very smart, disciplined defender; a "team man" a bit like Bartram. But also a good long kick, sound decision maker, strong mark for his size, could sneak forward and kick goals. Pace was a bit questionable, but carried a lot of niggles early on that he seems to be getting over now.

I'm glad he's now being used as more of a midfielder/occassional swingman, because at 190cm he was never going to make it as a FB/CHB at AFL level, not to mention being behind names at the club like Frawley, Garland, Rivers, Warnock, McDonald etc... Learning midfield & flanker roles gives him a chance at least, although he's gonna have to do something special between now and the end of the year to earn interest from Melbourne or another AFL club.

He never got a chance at Melbourne and never will, which is a shame, hopefully someone picks him up next year

I've always felt the exact same thing. His 3 AFL games in '09 were promising. I rated him ahead of Cheney, on talent, when he was at the club, and felt like he was wrongly being groomed as a tall defender when he really just wasn't big enough for it. Always was a very smart, disciplined defender; a "team man" a bit like Bartram. But also a good long kick, sound decision maker, strong mark for his size, could sneak forward and kick goals. Pace was a bit questionable, but carried a lot of niggles early on that he seems to be getting over now.

I'm glad he's now being used as more of a midfielder/occassional swingman, because at 190cm he was never going to make it as a FB/CHB at AFL level, not to mention being behind names at the club like Frawley, Garland, Rivers, Warnock, McDonald etc... Learning midfield & flanker roles gives him a chance at least, although he's gonna have to do something special between now and the end of the year to earn interest from Melbourne or another AFL club.

I would like to see him get a run as a wing / HFF over the next couple of months, even maybe as a sub, just to see whether the very strong performances in his initial 3 games so long ago were a fluke, or true promise. And I am also glad to see that he is no longer regarded as a tall KPP defender, because he isn't! He certainly doesn't shirk any issue like a couple of our more highly rated players do on occasions.

I haven't seen much of him tbh but wonder if part of the reason he was being played as a KPD rather than a midfielder in his first couple of years at the club is related to his fitness and endurance levels?

I'll be totally honest and say I see more in TMac than I do in Maric.

That's hardly a glowing endorsement though is it? Doggo said in the next post that he rated McNamara ahead of Cheney too. The problem is that nobody's said which players he's better than that are actually remotely close to being in the side.

I thought McNamara looked okay in the couple of matches he played for Melbourne, but really he's so far down the pecking order in both the roles he's played (defender and mid) that I can't see how he could possibly make it. He's never been in our best 30 players and I doubt he ever will be. This was my stance last year and it hasn't changed.

Just one of the thousands of players who go through the elite system that just aren't quite good enough.


That's hardly a glowing endorsement though is it? Doggo said in the next post that he rated McNamara ahead of Cheney too. The problem is that nobody's said which players he's better than that are actually remotely close to being in the side.

I thought McNamara looked okay in the couple of matches he played for Melbourne, but really he's so far down the pecking order in both the roles he's played (defender and mid) that I can't see how he could possibly make it. He's never been in our best 30 players and I doubt he ever will be. This was my stance last year and it hasn't changed.

Just one of the thousands of players who go through the elite system that just aren't quite good enough.

No, fair point. However, there are plenty on this site who rate Maric. I don't, which most people know.

I really want to say I see as bright an AFL future for TMac as I do for Bennell. But I don't. Close, though.

I agree, he isn't going to make it here, unless something drastic happens between now and the end of the year (e.g. huge amount of injuries, consistently dominant performances at Casey, neither of which are probable). But I maintain that he can make it at AFL level and if he gets another chance I would not be surprised if he does in fact make it.

No, fair point. However, there are plenty on this site who rate Maric. I don't, which most people know.

I really want to say I see as bright an AFL future for TMac as I do for Bennell. But I don't. Close, though.

I agree, he isn't going to make it here, unless something drastic happens between now and the end of the year (e.g. huge amount of injuries, consistently dominant performances at Casey, neither of which are probable). But I maintain that he can make it at AFL level and if he gets another chance I would not be surprised if he does in fact make it.

He may well do, but I think if he's that far down the 'choices' list for a spot on our in our side, I doubt it would be different anywhere else.

He may well do, but I think if he's that far down the 'choices' list for a spot on our in our side, I doubt it would be different anywhere else.

If he was taken by GWS I can see him starting in their Round 1 side.

 

At the beginning of the season how was Daniel Nicholson rated, he was a rookie...it is all about opportunity....I actually asked both Dean Bailey and Todd Viney about Tommy Mac, if you ask a question you will be surprised...you actually get an honest answer....T Mac is a rookie, his first two years at the Club he couldn't get a clear run at it because of injuries....they offered him a place on the rookie list and he accepted.

Forward to the start of the season.....he again picked up a slight injury but after discussions Kelly O'Donnell, because we now have some really good tall defenders. suggested to the other coaches that Tommy Mac may make a good midfielder. he has a good footy brain and clean hands.....five or six games in. albeit in the VFL, he is BOG with 31 disposals

The one thing I like about the present FD is they think outside the square with a lot of players......before Roh Bail got injured he was playing a run with role...halfback seemed his natural place........I actually knew this was going to happen because I had asked Josh Mahoney what he thought Roh's future at the club was and he said as a run with...so his pre season was already planned before the end of the last one.....

If Tommy Mac makes it....great, because he is being given every opportunity to do it by the Club...if he makes it at Melbourne even better...

If he was taken by GWS I can see him starting in their Round 1 side.

Wouldn't surprise me either .


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 221 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies