Jump to content

2010 Player Review - # 44 Rohan Bail

Featured Replies

 

One of my favourites. Seems to go from having a quiet game, to making plays that change the course of the game so often. Love his pace.

A huge find. Runs and runs and runs and is tough too.

Decent disposal. Seems to be a smart player. Runs to the right places.

In fact, doesn't seem to have many weaknesses to be exploited.

Had no idea he would make such an impact after what was a prett lacklustre first season, albeit curbed by injury.

Will never be a star but a very very handy role player.

His emergence was another reason for our improvement in 2010.

 

Definately a keeper .

Like his size for a mid and the way he goes about it.

Love him - his only weakness is that he gives away too many blatantly obvious free kicks. Something that can obviously be eradicated


Totally agree with the views of others on this thread.

A really good find - one of my favourite players too, though I don't really know why. I just like his game.

Important part of the side now. His run is unending. Backs up every time. And his kicking is pretty good as well. Definitely 'Best 22' material.

Great pick up from late in the draft.

A really good find - one of my favourite players too, though I don't really know why. I just like his game.

He has a certain air of reliability about him, doesn't he?

 

Important part of the side now. His run is unending. Backs up every time. And his kicking is pretty good as well. Definitely 'Best 22' material.

Great pick up from late in the draft.

Could not agree more.

Just proves that there are gems later in the draft.

Not all the gold is in the first twenty.

My view is to judge the recruiting depart by their later picks

I could have worked out to pick Scully and Trengove.

But choosing Bail takes skill!

Could not agree more.

Just proves that there are gems later in the draft.

Not all the gold is in the first twenty.

My view is to judge the recruiting depart by their later picks

I could have worked out to pick Scully and Trengove.

But choosing Bail takes skill!

True.

He's a gem, what a great pickup.


Decent disposal.

I don't know about that. I think he's on a par with Scully. A bit up and under, not really incredible depth... but given his run, it usually doesn't matter too much, and he knows what he's capable of. Doesn't bite off more than he can chew.

one of my favourite players too, though I don't really know why. I just like his game.

That's what I was trying to say. I keep trying to crystallise why he makes me excited, and why I don't fear when he's near the pill. There's no one thing he does incredibly well, he just keeps doing good/great things.

Given his background before he was drafted, and given the fact I had him in front of only Healy in terms of guys I thought wouldn't make it, I reckon he could end up being BPs biggest masterstroke, potentially. Obviously has a looong way to go, but all things being equal, there was no way he should have done what he has.

I don't know about that. I think he's on a par with Scully. A bit up and under, not really incredible depth... but given his run, it usually doesn't matter too much, and he knows what he's capable of. Doesn't bite off more than he can chew.

Yeah, like I said, decent disposal.

Could not agree more.

Just proves that there are gems later in the draft.

Not all the gold is in the first twenty.

My view is to judge the recruiting depart by their later picks

I could have worked out to pick Scully and Trengove.

But choosing Bail takes skill!

Well said indeed. This years Draft should still get the MFC some top players.

Not all of the GC Corporate Raider draft picks will turn to gold.

Yeah, like I said, decent disposal.

You're in that group then? I'm in the "Scully's not a great kick" group. I'm not massively negative. Judd's not a great kick either. And I'd take hard-work+footy-brain+ball-magnet (Judd, Scully) over good kick and nothing else (Strauss so far) any day. Was not meant as a huge insult.

I think that Scully is a better kick than people generally give him credit for.

And 'decent' to me essentially means 'good enough' or 'nothing wrong it, it's just not exceptional'.

Neither Scully or Judd, or Ablett for that matter, are exceptional kicks, but they are definitely all good enough to be very, very effective.


I think that Scully is a better kick than people generally give him credit for.

And 'decent' to me essentially means 'good enough' or 'nothing wrong it, it's just not exceptional'.

Neither Scully or Judd, or Ablett for that matter, are exceptional kicks, but they are definitely all good enough to be very, very effective.

Interesting. I think we're on the same page albeit with different words. I'd like to go into it further, but that would be appropriate for a Scully thread.

I don't know about that. I think he's on a par with Scully. A bit up and under, not really incredible depth... but given his run, it usually doesn't matter too much, and he knows what he's capable of. Doesn't bite off more than he can chew.

Bail is a better kick than Scully.

Nope, Scully edges Bail. Has more penetration on his kick too.

And yeah Dappa, I think the difference is just semantics.

While I like Bail who has surprised on the upside after some lacklustre Casey performances last year, I am not sure at this point he has nailed a best 22 role. He is in the mix and needs to continue to improve.

As for Scully...he is a decent kick and will get better as he becomes more at home in AFL. He was very good in his first year.

As for Judd... I know he has been a fabulous player over his career and won his 2nd B'low but in the last 6 to 8 weeks of the season, I was underwhelmed with his disposal and kicking ability. I reckon he is still battling "groin problems" and can put no strength on his kicks. He has lost penetration and taps at the ball. He will finish with a great career. I just wonder how long he will last..

Nope, Scully edges Bail. Has more penetration on his kick too.

I like Scully, he will be a gun but his kicking is a major weakness. Bail has far more penetration in his kicking, Scully still pops anything greater than about 30 metres in the air, even Scully himself would concede this.


loves how this bloke goes about it, hope he plays the majority of 2011 in the red and blue

Bail is a better kick than Scully.

Scully can kick a goal from 50 Bail struggles from 40, I say Scully is a better kick.

only qualm is when he centred it to Ricky P in the dying seconds of QB. Should have handballed to Davey or drilled it himself. That one still hurts.

 

only qualm is when he centred it to Ricky P in the dying seconds of QB. Should have handballed to Davey or drilled it himself. That one still hurts.

That's the one I'm talking about. I think the worst miss of the year goes to Watts against freo. Imagine if that had been a final.

Raised one of my eyebrows this season, let's see if he can raise the other eyebrow in 2011.

Unsure on best 22 status, I'll reserve my judgment on him in 2011.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Haha
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Sad
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 40 replies