MrMoose

Well after watching the hawks absolutely smash Richmond in the wet last night, maybe our effort last week wasn't so bad after all!

Hardest part of the game for me to take was watching Cameron Bruce out running Jack Trengove and then going on to kick a goal. Made my guts turn!

AWESOME! Will definately buy 1 for the daughter!

All 4 membership packs for my family arrived in the 1 large parcel this morning. (Membership re-newed in October) VERY impressed - the new emblem that emblazes everything looks fantastic. Fixture magnet is now on the fridge, stickers on car, calender on the wall, membership hanging on hook by front door - roll on season 2011! Go Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee's!

http://search.twitter.com/search?q=craighutchy

100% correct PLUS 17 + 4 + 10 = 31, Barassi's jumper number!

Prefer a 'live' video with all the players having a crack at singing, dancing and acting!

Mine just arrived this morning. after a 3 1/2 week wait. Looks Great!

I now know the real word they put the 'U' in - it rhymes with the name of the New Zealand born NRL player who is playing for the Gold Coast Suns!

May I suggest a DNA test - you may have taken home the wrong kid from the hospital when she was born!

Would not be a good move for Bate if he went to Gold Coast - too much sunshine and way too many UV rays for a Ranga! Has possible OH & S implications too! He would have to play all 'home day games' in a long sleeve jumper, trousers and a legionaires cap!

Thanks for this!

Brilliant footballer - I love watching him play the game! He reminds me of the player I wish I was!

99.9% sure he is out of contract at the end of the season. I wonder what the club will offer him after such a great year?

Other than '2 out on the full kicks' and a clanger, I thought Barty played a ripper today. His tackling was ferocious and he ran hard all day. It must have been the fluoro boots he was wearing! Considering there were lots who wanted (or still do want) to trade him, I reckon he has turned alot of of negative opinions around!

The umpires are NOT meant to be highlighted in a game in anyway - good causes or not. Why the F&*K didn't they wear fluro green? Pack of Carmichaels!

AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SO from that weak response Rhino I assume you concede that the facts out-weighed your deluded statements. A simple 'you're right & i was wrong' would have sufficed - not necessarily about my opinion of the tackle being reviewed but about your errors!

This is a danger game if ever there was one. All the good work could be well and truely undone if we lose this one. I apologise for being negative but it doesn't bear thinking about if we get beaten - we have been through enough pain!

Rhino, Please get your facts RIGHT. I should not have to do the research for you and I am not here for a 'to & fro [censored] fight' with you but once again you are wrong! They DID review the Jordan Lewis decision! So keep you little digs to yourself and keep to the facts! Here's the link for you (again!) http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/92147/default.aspx Your reasoning for the 'non-review' of the Green incident is deluded - it was as the result of an "actual action" - how else would it happen? Green just didn't fall down and bump his head on the turf all by himself - spare me! Here's a link to the photo of the incident! Not a collision injury! LMAO!!!!! http://www.triplem.com.au/sydney/sport/blog/hard-yakka-toughest-player-of-the-week//blog/hard-yakkas-toughest-player-round-1/20100330-7zox.html

Rhino, they don't review 'all matters' at all. You might remember an incident in Round 1 - Melbourne Vs Hawthorn - where Brad Green was "stretchered off in a neck brace" but he didn't go to hospital. According to your 'theory' it should have been reviewed. Or because he didn't go to hospital, that's makes a difference and the incident was OK and didn't need reviewing? I have included a copy of the link to prove that it wasn't looked at by the MRP - http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/91255/default.aspx There was never ever anything in this incident that needed reviewing.

Firstly, I can't believe that it was actually looked at by Match review Panel. Secondly, did this count as 1 tackle (3 blokes tackling 1 bloke = 1 act of tackling) or 3 tackles (3 blokes performing a tackle = 3 tackles)????????? Not that i really care - it was sensational! (Not the injury, just the tackle)

Don't understand why supporters rely on the team to win games to decide whether they take out a membership! I take out mine & the families, win lose or draw!

Bartram - outstanding game.

Was good to see Bartram get back to some of his best tagging form!