Bluey's Dad

I don't want to speak for him but I think he mentioned previously that Dees2014 had been quoted on other forums and that lead him here.

Gonna assume that has nothing to do with him doing industrial sized dumps and everything to do with his name. Would be pretty funny though if it was the futurama thing.

I hope he does too, from a Dees point of view. But the supercoach player in me says it's not worth it. It helps that I already had Goldy and Nic Nat, so I don't have the need to trade for a high risk ruckman.

You'd have to be pretty brave given his injury history.

Not only do I think we're ahead, but I actually DO think Brayshaw is a better player than Frawley as it currently stands. Any club would take Brayshaw over Frawley right now.

I have such a massive smile on my face right now. This is now my all-time favourite picture. It's perfect.

Far too much logic for this system to ever be implemented.

*paints target on forehead* I actually like Hawthorn's clash jumper, although like you I don't know why one is required for them. They don't clash with anyone. Merchandising I guess?

Quite correct OD. It seems to be the only thing the entirety of the DL community can agree on.

We may well be. His statement about the AFL being flogs though still stands.

Wow, big difference. Based on that you'd draft nothing but inside mids and trade for other positions.

I hope I can convince my kid to love footy at 4. I can barely get him to watch 5 minutes at a time! Good on the club for doing this sort of stuff. I love reading these stories. In all seriousness, how do you get him to get excited about the game? My boy just looks blankly at me like I'm an idiot for watching it.

Cannot like this post. Agree 100%.

Every time I read his name I hear it in Old Man Crawf's voice. VINCE! VINCE! *fart* Edit: yes, my contributions to this forum are immense.

Looking for company OD? I've changed my avatar to be part of the club. Misery, company and all that.

I suppose when you start winning it mitigates the envy issue somewhat.

I think it was a little different with Buddy. Bringing in the best key forward in the competition on huge money is a little different than brining in a star midfielder, especially when you already have one in Pendles. Sure, Sydney had Tippett, but we all know Buddy is better.

I am going to copy and paste this comment into the next 'fan survey' the AFL does. 100% agree.

That'd be crazy. Pendles is more valuable than Dangerfield (as good as he is). You're right in it being a recipe for instability I reckon.

I just can't fathom how, since the Tribunal accepted much of what Mr Holmes said in that transcript, that the players themselves weren't sanctioned.