-
Posts
16,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
22
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by rjay
-
Not good 'Redleg',but they do make it up on the run as we're just about to see with Essendon.
-
Inside Football: Watts & pick 2 for David Swallow - prelim discussions
rjay replied to Machsy's topic in Melbourne Demons
Anyone think the new coach might have something to say about this...sorry forgot we don't have one yet. These guys are making stuff up at the moment. Midfielder wants to move, Melbourne needs a midfielder, Watts wants to move = must be true. Pick 2 is overs and anyway we don't know what picks we will have yet.- 64 replies
-
- SEN rumour
- Swallow
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yep 'Yossarian', it's kind of a catch 22.
-
'steve', I don't think he has had a real breakout year. He's had breakout patches, it looked like they found the best use for him off HB until opposition coaches found that he couldn't play one on one. He's a no for me unless we pick him up cheap. In a lot of ways he's an unfulfilled talent like Watts, butI think Watts has more upside with his versatility.
-
Very interesting. Libba said that under the definition of tanking given by Mike that Carlton, not the players, went out to deliberately loose matches.
-
Looks to be a guess 'stuie', it may well be right but not good form.
-
THE DRAFT: TAC CUP FUTURE STARS ROLLING DRAFT
rjay replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
He is a very good player 'Chippy' as are the other 4 on the list. It will be interesting to see what picks we end up with and who we take. -
Someone better tell Dean Kent he is a mature aged 19 year old.
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
No you're right as usual, in the Essendon case the club bought a bunch of banned drugs. -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
WADA don't work this way 'Titan', so it's not rubbish. They have the power to rub out the entire club if they see fit. Lets wait and see what happens, my bet is that evidence will come up that implicates some players, evidence that has been missing to date. This 'Titan', it's not absolute rubbish it's the way they do business. -
Yeah, with you here. I'm not sure he would add anymore than we have already with McKenzie.
-
If Clisby gets more weeks than C. Brown then...
rjay replied to DeeSpencer's topic in Melbourne Demons
Found that a bit strange 'Redleg'. Medium??? -
If Clisby gets more weeks than C. Brown then...
rjay replied to DeeSpencer's topic in Melbourne Demons
Brown gets his 3 which ends his season and maybe his career. Nothing on Clisby so free to play. -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
You don't seem to understand the word circumstantial. ...but my point is that if they can't work out who took what but they know that illegal substances have been used by players in the club then all players may face penalties unless it can be proved they didn't. -
If Clisby gets more weeks than C. Brown then...
rjay replied to DeeSpencer's topic in Melbourne Demons
It was the first minute of the 3rd q, he very definitely kicked him in the face. It was an action with one leg and he kicked out directly at the face. -
If Jack Viney doesn't get the Rising Star Nomination, I will ...
rjay replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
His brothers not bad either 'D26'. Matt looks more like Rory Sloane than Brad, probably the hair. -
No Carlton players thanks....
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
...our guys must have taken the placebo. -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
I wouldn't be happy with a player group running around with an advantage. I love the way they tried to spin that one a month or so ago that the stuff they were taking didn't give them an advantage, well how stupid are they and why would they take anything they didn't think would give them the advantage. Sorry but you can't have players in a competition who have a real or perceived advantage over others no matter how innocent they may be. As a club they have made huge advances this year until they have hit the mental barrier now and Monfries, when was he ever likely to kick 7 goals against the Cats. Circumstantial, yes but if the club has been found to have used this stuff then they all need to be rubbed out unless Essendon can suddenly find the documentation that details who took what. -
I'm not sure Gavin has aspirations to be a senior coach and as has been said by many it looks like a senior coach this time. I'm hearing your arguments 'jumbo' so am leaning towards a transition plan if Roos or a Clarkson doesn't come on board. Simpson has appeal.
-
I think he is giving it his best shot but the decision making is really hard for him to improve on, what we see is what we get with Nicho and he's done a lot more than most if not all of us on here have done. He has played AFL football. Can't knock him for that.
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
rjay replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
I think Ricciuto was almost right just his time line was a bit out. -
If and it is a big if..it were to happen it would be more than likely Craig as coach with Simpson the understudy. I wouldn't imagine any of the others, Williams, Eade or Ratten would be interested in this type of set up. I also don't think we will appoint an untried coach not even with a mentor but it may be a senior coach with someone like Simpson as coach in waiting.
-
Might have to start hanging around the singles bars with 'Woosha'.... ...you think he will really come back, she might but I can't see him following. Same story was going around about Mick many years back, he did come back but not until he finished his business with WC.
-
Davis lacks the skill of these other players but he does compete and hit the packs hard and bring the ball to ground. I think he did his job pretty well if that was his assignment. Watts can do a lot of things but he doesn't do this, Gunstan doesn't either by the way. They are both floaters and opportunists.