Jump to content

Demon Disciple

Life Member
  • Posts

    9,628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Demon Disciple

  1. Official!!! http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-21/pick-no7-bugg-flies-into-dees-from-gws Great trading
  2. Could very well be used to upgrade either of vDB or Harmes, so it will be quite valuable!
  3. We can still go after Prestia next year by trading another future 1st rounder to GC (2017), we may even give up our 2nd rounder (2016) to help give them points for their Academy player's they have next year. It just mean we won't be able to do any future picks trading of 1st rounders for the next 2 years afterwards.
  4. Or, "i can't believe he was still available at pick10. We rated him at #4"
  5. Not sure if the Suns have any academy kid who will cost them that much though. They have a few coming through next year, which is why they took our first rounder next year for them.
  6. When trying to trade for the 'so-called player' GNF was alluding to, instead of taking the high picks to the draft.....................yes.
  7. 2 of Parish, Weideman & Curnow isn't bad, no matter which way you look at it.
  8. It may be Curnow, it may be Parish, hell it may be Weideman. Either way, we have targeted a player at 3 and (Taylor) want him. That fills me with some comfort.
  9. This write-up seems to pump him up a bit more. Pick #8 http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-10-18/phantom-form-guide-update
  10. http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-21/we-wont-trade-picks-no3-no10-mahoney Whoops!!! GNF you're an absolute muppet. From all the un-eventuated cr@p you dribbled last trade period to the above opinion that directly contradicted what Mahoney said on the radio, i'd have more belief in a mail-box than the stuff you hear!
  11. If we were able to snare both Curnow and Weideman come draft time, i'd be over the moon (moreso than if it were one of those 2 and Parish).
  12. Not your problem, so don't worry about it. With Taylor now in charge as opposed to that imposter Pretendergast, i will put my faith in whoever we pick at 3 because we have clearly had that kid ear-marked. Pick 10 is the more interesting one.
  13. I just hope Weideman is around at pick 10
  14. I'd advise on having a shower before doing anything else.
  15. They did manage to pull our pants down this year though, didn't they
  16. Umm, no he's not http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-05-13/whos-up-for-grabs-the-preliminary-list-of-2016-free-agents-
  17. The question is though, had we drafted Ollie Wines instead, would've he gone on to become the player he is now? He would've been better than Toumpas no doubt, but probably not as good as he has become.
  18. Not really, SOS is just bringing the rejects he recruited down to the Blues to further continue their ineptness.
  19. Well it would probably leave Weideman for us to draft. He could be the one to help out Hogan. All is not lost, we'll get a decent kid at pick 6. One of Francis, Parish, Curnow or Weideman. I would be more [censored] if we had pick 7 and all those kids had already been selected.
×
×
  • Create New...