beelzebub

I concur... Hopefully teh lay of the land was explained in unabiguous terms to him though !!

He's Buddy good at diverting attention , not bad for a bloke with such a Roughead !!!

It is odd isnt it..lol. Hes damned either way. We can all only do what we can do. Appreciate any and all efforts Garry...as Im sure Jim does to.

well..yes he had said that in teh past. And yet there he was on camera the other night /day saying one of his immediate jhobs was to get Melbourne the best coach it could. Im not the one changing my mind...but circumstances have changed somewhat ..havent they.

Well thats the long and short of it isnt it. Its not that any riule per se has been broken just the expectations of some. Personally Id have been disappointed had we not taken advantage of where we were at. I was glad we learnt the lesson of the previous year. Funny how Carlton are very quiet at the moment !! lol ...shhh...tanking doesnt exist....ask Vlad !! Jeffrey always has an interesting take on history doesnt he....always has his own version handy to refer to especially when he's forgotten things that even hes supposedly said or agreed to.

And yet the reccent displays of the older group bring their causes into focus. Neither Green nor Rivers looked suitably devasted after the debacle. Sylvias management are on record as being miffed by the performance clauses. At the same time you had a number of the kids giving their all but with no senior backup. You make of that what you will.. I ll make of it what I choose.

You just get the feeling there's still much more to much of this. Theres a fraction too much friction or its an affliction of too much fiction !!

It ought to be Metro...about as consitent with their trains as we are with our footy !!

Melbourne by 1pt for no logical reason what soever

longstanding ??

cough ** 2004*** cough

im thinking that often emerging brands pick such beings as football jumpers to sponsor. M-Benz isnt such a beast. However one of the new Chinese car brands might just be such a beast. Youve also got emerging retailers such as the new Bunnings Competitor , Masters.

MFC could hardly be accused of under delivering !! Kaspersky are on record stating they can attribute their emergence as a brand here directly to their MFC sponsorship. No one outside of IT knoew of them here til they appeared on our jumper.

Pure guesswork here.. but am thinking the new sponsor might actually be secured.. but with all the rumpus this week they might have defered announcing to next. well, one hope s!!

I think you might be right RB !!

yes really...look for yourself MFC sponsors

Volvo isnt a sponsor anymore..

Maurie I was just going to suggest the same comparison to what must be the most marketable jumper in teh league....Collingwood's ( sigh) .. Emirates is positioned like Hankook...just below the clubs emblem.. Its a furphy for sure.

well then Old...you better hope its not....

or perhaps.......finally ???????????????

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!

mate... im fully aware of such things.. and the reality is the logo has dropped by about2- 3 cm only in position...its a non argument. TheMFC emblem sits high on the chest. Hardly influencing the Hankook. just look at comparitive images.

Its not like the Hankook logo is banished to the socks or such...its as big as day and in your face.. The positioning argument inthis instance is hooey!! A convenience of exit..and if so..fair enough.. Thanks for your support...and bye !!!

october rpfc...october...lol

I think its very important to keep inmind its as much the coaching team as it is the nominated "coach" . Malthouse is succesful because of who he has around him. So it must/will be at Melbourne. I cant say that at present weve got what we need. All elements of our game seem wanting. A big hole left after Wellmans departure is still a big hole. Centre play seems somewhat one dimensional and even adhoc at times. The forward setup hasnt settled or really gelled. Needs a bit of a clean sweep though out..not just THE 'coach'