Jump to content

whatwhat say what

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whatwhat say what

  1. bill another point - charlie dean falconed it thru on the line failing to make the distance from 35m out
  2. maggots have put the whistle away at least three clear htb decisions (2 for us, 1 for them) not paid
  3. verrall adds to the points list with a snap over his shoulder from the edge of the goalsquare - probably had more time than he thought then
  4. deakyn smith with a fantastic smother to keep the ball in our f50
  5. don't forget (allegedly) gifting tracts of land and cotton on franchises to help manage their salary cap
  6. 1.3.9 to 0.1.1 at quarter time laurie the sole goalscorer billings everywhere around stoppages, plugger mac in control down back tom campbell vs the septic has been a good match-up
  7. Injured or a chance of a call up for Monday?
  8. Much better than their red one
  9. tigs are playing good footy jj on vlastuin, but it ain't working early - if he's not tagging in the midfield, his effectiveness is moot
  10. i said to my crom mate midway thru the 2nd quarter 'i would love zac bailey at the dees' sure enough, 3 shots on goal, 3 out on the full? very mfc areas
  11. If Rayner had the heart of Trac he’d be up there too
  12. bears are so good to watch
  13. nibbs taking zorko out? INJECT IT INTO MY VEINS our former favourite has started well
  14. our media dept's attention to detail is consistently inconsistent
  15. i'd argue that has been the case since dusty martin was the tigs' biggest weapon 2017-2021 if trac or clangerfilled could kick, they'd be the same for us and the puddy tatts
  16. well i woulda tipped footscray, but dingley did a number on em... it might be the better result for the mfc? elsewhere... crom? bloods? puddy tatts gw$? kangas? peptides? them we really need to win first and foremost, and otherwise it's a toss of the coin as to whether gw$ / pear is a better result for us
  17. it's...off? Speaker Michelle O’Byrne has voted with the yes, in support of the no confidence motion, 18-17. The motion of no-confidence has succeeded.
  18. grow the game = increase value of broadcast rights + volume of wagering the notion that the northern franchises have some altruistic intent to expand afl into uncharted areas is absurd
  19. quite a different take to what's actually in the report, which cal added context around sounds to me like we're in conversation about extending the deal beyond 2027, which is a good sign
  20. it won't add anything to the tv rights...until a 20th team comes in with daz n / the saudi pif taking over from the murdochs owning foxtel, there's already talk they want to ditch the production of the mag shows for fox footy / league, as they're too expensive for minimal return there's so much uncertainty as to the future of the rights value because of the changed landscape of the provider at the start of this current rights cycle, let alone the future rights cycle beyond 2032
  21. not height; shadows the design is 'aesthetically pleasing' apart from all the shadows on the pitch