daisycutter

let's hope he goes to essington

yeah, fair point. I seem to remember discussion on this in previous years and talk of tightening up on it. seems it never happened.

this? so, ok, can nominate a different amount for year 1 and year 2. this is different than what some media people have indicated you are partly right as in the above, but there is no provision to add any other contractual terms (write your own contract) cheers

so how much academy development work did the suns do on him? oh, that's right....none, zip, nada surely the fair way to switchover from dees to suns would be the start of 2020 first they steal our pick 2 off us and then the steal our potential academy pick......for no compo

actually they can't set any contract they like it has to be min of 2 years and can only be expressed as x $s over y years. that's it everyone can then bid on just that basis whoever then gets him can pre-load or back-load by mutual consent, but can't go less than the x over y

ok, so we can't trade our 2020 2nd unless we can trade another 2nd in (this year or next year before nd)

yeah it's ok. do we have 2 2nds for 2020 now? if so can trade either one and still satisfy rules for no 1st

we can't trade next years 2nd because we don't have a 1st (unless we can get another 2nd before 2020 nd)

i think the allowable max amount is 82% to 84%

try and trade it for a first rounder, preferably with dodoro or carlscum

really?

problem is it is not even new ways. we already knew thymosin b4 wasn't on the banned list when used. it was prohibited because it was not approved for human use. and all that was discussed ad finitum previously. they know that and are just being disingenuous.

that would be draft fixing moonie and too obvious. need to be a bit more creative to pass muster

can you clarify that if he nominates say $700k/yr for 2 years, that he could turn around and only sign for 1 year with the suns. Wouldn't this be in breach of the rules. And yeah i know that the afl has elastic rules. comments?

plus he can nominate a contract length of > 1 year, so he won't be a FA in 2020 if suns pick him in psd

carlton definitely gaming (screwing) the suns. if they value him at $700k they should have been prepared to offer a commensurate trade value. They did not, and they had the ability to. I hope suns pick him up in psd (probably a slim chance)

yeah but there are dh's and then there are mega dh's and mega dh's with mega injury concerns

he won't go into the nd

i think the afl have rules against unrelated dependent type pick swaps. swaps should be of mutual benefit in themselves and not be related to any "rigging" of the draft. can't remember rules exactly but there is some catch-all to prevent "funny business" which naturally the afl decide in private. i.e. give me an advantageous pick swap and i promise not to pick player x. of course this can be disguised in many cases, but in this case might look a bit obvious. just a thought

not only can't lose what you've already lost, plus will gain in 12 months time via compo pick if he sooks it up he can play neafl all year he sits it out at his own peril - no contract - loss of form etc (mccartney never recovered) suns can send a strong message i like it

still young (23) and 198cm

hint: "well placed sources" = demonland or other social media "sources"

all clubs don't have a chance he will only go into psd where carlscum have pick3 has said he won't go back to suns so that leaves only us, and his management have said they don't want to talk to us plus most clubs won't have any list spots left for psd anyway carlscum have gamed the system beautifully

i suspect that carlton have always planned to get a freebie via the psd pretty rough on suns to end up with nothing