It's the 2017/18 contract negotiations that disturb me. In a semi-good way. Just don't want to lose players through unnatural attrition - inflated contract offers from rival clubs that we can't possibly match. Geelong and the Hawks have been lucky - through culture/team bonding/success or some such but those days are dying I suspect.
Cheers Demon Jack, BarnDee and Member's Wing. I must apologise though, I was just being a disingenuous arse. I meant can someone explain it as in; Motlop is sledged by the opposition and then narked on by his teammates and misses a game despite being BOG - and we should then steer clear as such? I probably don't have the full story.
Didn't we put a sizeable offer to Hanners this year though? And it may conserve our dollars now but if we have everyone of the same age come through at the same time it squeezes the cap as there's nothing being cleared through retirement/natural attrition etc., no?
Had a feeling we've been tracking a season behind the Dogs in our overall development for a while now. Hope this is the case and the foundations will click into place next year.
I find this wording curious. Are you suggesting there was indeed some form of set-back in our recruitment efforts but we'll continue to negotiate and haven't given up hope?
There goes Kennedy. Interesting that they're not looking to increase our age spread but build instead as we have a big generational hole in the middle of our list. We might then be a way off yet still but later have a solid group that can keep us atop for an extended period. It's a true rebuild. Hopefully we can manage our salary cap with this approach although it will probably be dependent on a sniff of early success.