Jump to content

ManDee

Life Member
  • Posts

    5,713
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by ManDee

  1. Gawn in the ruck swapping with Jamar at FF Yes 2 ruckmen, both capable of a mark & goal or 2. Riley, you answered that yourself. McKenzie in for Byrnes. - Salem to play Byrnes role.
  2. No I don't think so, successful AFL players require skill and effort. One without the other should have them playing VFL level. In a good side you need both. We want to be a good side. Lets start now.
  3. Out- Watts - No effort Bail - No skill Byrnes No longer has it. In - Gawn - A real ruckman that can play forward + 18 disposals Riley g&d (get back at Adelaide) McKenzie back to tackling best
  4. In the ruck Watts would not stand a chance, I think Max King would do a better job and I am not advocating picking him. (Rookie anyway) If you don't have strength below the waist you need to be fast, with a good leap and courageous. Is there a player at Melbourne that you think Watts could out strengthen? Think Pedersen, he would just push him away, and I don't rate him in the ruck. (Effort lately 8/10). I don't know if you have played in the ruck but it is hard work, it hurts, you get knees into everywhere from your thighs to your ribs back and front and you come off feeling like a punching bag, and your arms feel like lead. If your lucky you only get a couple of elbows to the head each game. The biggest ugliest brutes on opposition sides just want to jump into you and inflict pain. This is no place for Jack Watts. Watts is soft a. Because he does not want to get hurt. b. Too smart to get hurt. c. Thinks it is only a job, why get hurt. If you put him in the ruck he will give up completely and be lost. The only step I see is several weeks at Casey with clear instructions as to what is expected. If he can't deliver, offer him up for trade. PS> I am a Watts believer, I think he is capable but a late bloomer. I love his qualities, despise his failings. Edit ; Spelling.
  5. No real superstar among them compared to 2001 1 Hawthorn Luke Hodge Hawthorn 233 2 St Kilda Luke Ball Collingwood 212 3 West Coast Chris Judd Carlton 260 1 4 Fremantle Graham Polak 111 1 5 St Kilda Xavier Clarke 106 1 6 West Coast Ashley Sampi 78 1 7 North Melbourne David Hale Hawthorn 203 1 8 Geelong Jimmy Bartel Geelong 255 1 9 Melbourne Luke Molan 0 1 10 Western Bulldogs Sam Power
  6. Not a good draft 2008 but most rated Watts in best 2. Nic Nat 10 disposals (60% eff) 1 mark 14 hit outs last week has been hopeless. Watts 15 (60%) 3 marks Both seem to have the little boy lost syndrome and don't know what to do or where to go. 1 1 Melbourne Jack Watts Melbourne 79 2 West Coast Nicholas Naitanui West Coast 94 3 Fremantle Stephen Hill Fremantle 114 4 Port Adelaide Hamish Hartlett Port Adelaide 74 5 Essendon Michael Hurley Essendon 85 6 Carlton Christopher Yarran Carlton 90 7 Brisbane Daniel Rich Brisbane 101 8 Richmond Tyrone Vickery Richmond 79 9 North Melbourne Jack Ziebell North Melbourne 83 10 Adelaide Phil Davis GWS 54 from footywire. Edit: sorry table didn't make it. Number at end games played.
  7. I imagine Jack Watts with the courage and intensity of any other player on our list.
  8. No current, watts gone needs a big shock or to re charge his batteries. Ohm my God!
  9. Out- Watts Bail Byrnes In - Gawn Riley McKenzie
  10. Claiming you were right already. That is a BS. For the record, I don't believe it until I see it.
  11. From the weekend, "inching forward, centimeter by centimeter".
  12. I liked, "inching forward, centimeter by centimeter".
  13. Could we put his head on Watt's body?
  14. I too defend Watts. His efforts of late are indefensible. If he is not injured, he needs to play at Casey. If he is injured he needs to be rested. Watts would be killed in the ruck, his strengths are as an outside player. You can't hide in the ruck, he would be pushed out of the way as he has virtually no strength below his waste and not a lot above either. Sam Jacobs would kill him. Gawn in Watts out. Edit: As third man up he may be ok.
  15. No, we were fined for "bringing the game into disrepute". We were not guilty of tanking. Because tanking does not exist!
  16. I really dislike these empty statements. We will never know unless he leaves. If that happens you will blame him for leaving then forget your grandiose statement. I have one for you. Every other club would love to have him.
  17. What's on? From here to Eternity. Crying Game. Maybe the replay of Juan Antonio Samaranch " The Winner is Sydenee"
  18. Taking it one week at a time. Giving 110% Our Brand Possession football The cheques in the mail.
  19. I cannot divulge any further information other than his initials may have been Joffa Corfe. Only joking, although he was wearing a black & white beanie in court.
  20. I agree, however the rank and file must choose to follow. Some I fear are so lost they don't know where to go and who to follow.
  21. I heard a great defense to public urination. "Youse coundna seen nuthin. I'd finished pissen when youse pulled up." Guilty as charged.
  22. No, just none detected. So the Police thought there was something wrong with the test and they did it too. Still none detected. All agreed it was a stupid test (intended). Went on to blame the parked cars. Parking tickets to be issued today. Edit: Buddy cited for heroism in the face of unruly parallel parking. Queens Birthday honour mentioned. Perhaps even Sir Lance "Buddy" Franklin Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Guelphic Order
  23. They did an IQ test. None detected.
  24. I agree, probably just missed out when injured pre-season and we already had Mitch as a leader in the forward line.
×
×
  • Create New...