Rnd 22 2007. Carlton = Professional. Melbourne = stupid morons.

[red&blue&true 0]

that argument would work if the tanking would have any effect on our premiership chances which throughout this topic we have repeatedly shown that no no it wouldnt. if you don't believe me look at carlton. tell me their last five years has won them a flag.

you are a muppet. i may not know you but i know that much.

and with that i am off for the night.

thanks nugget for the back up

Yep, run off little one.. claim "im someone that [censored] about past players" i call you on it to back it up - You cant.

I ask you whether Billy woulda cared more about his cats 07 flag, or his last game whether he won or not? you ignore the question.

I ask whats the harm in trying something unconventional in a MEANINGLESS match, like trying a young KPP in a position hes never played before to see how he goes? NO ANSWER..

No hold onto your precious little dream that the MFC is a bastion of integrity in a competition of cheats - if it helps you sleep at night., fact is we arent any different - we just screwed up. At least i can admit it.

[Pipefitter 2,150]

Terrible thread. Get a carlton membership mate. Im here to win.

[Yencks 8]

Terrible thread. Get a carlton membership mate. Im here to win.

exactly, a terrible thread.

the fact is, if we lost that match, id like to find out your take on the immediate benefits (hence you complaining about our 100 point beltings)...

id also like to state that even though it is not officially called tanking, it still is, there is no doubt about it, and carlton did it worse than any other club has before....

i agree with all of the other people on this thread that if melbourne were to lose the carlton game purposely (by playing people that werent ready to play and giving people operations that didnt need operations), if we won a premiership in 5, or 7 years time, i would be tainted IMO

just if carlton won a premiership in the next 3 or 4 years, i would not have respect for their amazing coaching and extremely hard work because IMO, they cheated to get there

now this is my opinion and not yours.....these arguments are going no where and it is obvious that i have a different opinion to you so i think we should "agree to disagree"

[red&blue&true 0]

exactly, a terrible thread.

the fact is, if we lost that match, id like to find out your take on the immediate benefits (hence you complaining about our 100 point beltings)...

I never said it would have immediate benifits, i said it was no comfort when our side was copping 100pt losses every week. If we had a chance at a first round priority at the end of the year - ie chance to draft the next Riewolt/Kosi or Franklin/Roughhead combo, that would be a SMALL comfort.

now this is my opinion and not yours.....these arguments are going no where and it is obvious that i have a different opinion to you so i think we should "agree to disagree"

Fine, im not looking for fights. So i can agree to disagree, but if you truley after watching Melbourne win a premiership on grand final day when that siren sounded when everyone else is going absoloutely nuts because in most of our cases after decades of dissapointment and heartache we were witnessing our team win its first premiership, you wouldn't be? because you were wondering if it was 'tainted' or not.. surely thats a joke.

[red&blue&true 0]

Get a carlton membership mate.

No way mate, i havent lived thru the Hell it is being a Melbourne supporter to drop off now

Ill never drop off this club, ill sink with the ship if it comes to that, i just wonder howmany mates ill have sinking with me.

[stretch marks 2]

how many games have the Blues won this year?

[Jaded No More 68,867]

Losing the match would have been a bigger positive than winning it was.

However nobody was going to lose to Carlton that day. To send off one of our best servants in Nathan Brown (and Biz) by losing on purpose to the tanking cheats from Carlton, is a pathetic thing to do.

I'm sure we weren't trying overly hard to win the match, and all injured parties were rested. However, at the end of the day players were still going for the ball and doing their best to kick straight in front of goal. If their instincts told them otherwise we would be in a shitload of trouble. I don't want players at Melbourne who are not instinctively hungry and desperate to win.

For Carlton losing comes naturally. Thank god we haven't reached that stage yet.

[praha 11,236]

Carlton would have gotten Judd either way. They only had to give up no. 3 for him, and both scenarios have them with pick 3. I have no doubt they would have sent 3 to WC even if it was their earliest pick.

[Scoop Junior 3,435]

I hear you Red&blue.

Trouble is, it wasn't the Carlton game, it was the Bulldogs game that killed us. Carlton were never going to win that Rd 22 game, there was too big a prize at stake. Mark Riley played strong sides (well, as strong as possible) for most of the remainder of the season. Had we played only young, inexperienced players, the Dogs may have beaten us, leaving us with four wins. This is not cheating - it's called list management. There's no rule against playing particular players in your squad.

4 wins would've meant an extra pick in the high teens which could've landed another decent player.

And judging by our form so far this season, we might be heading for priority pick territory.

The simple fact is we need more talent on this list. Talent is more likely to come early in the draft. So saying that winning that Carlton game was more important than high draft picks is just ridiculous.

[mick2007 0]

If we tried to lose that game Carlton would have just rolled over even more. Carlton dont have any pride or credibility to uphold they have always been dodgy, Drug dealers hanging around the club preying on young and upcoming footballers, and shady business men which are crooks running it . Under the table dealings. Judd must feel very comfortable down there at Carlton. Atleast we can hold our head up high and not be seen as the Ben Johnson(Athlete) of Aussie Rules footy.

[Yze_Magic 3]

Melbourne get picks 2,18,20 + eligable for first round priority pick following year. (most likely picks 1+2 + 17 looking at our form)

So this year we arent eligible for 1 and 2? That is shocking if true

To add 2 of the trio of Rich, Hurley and Natanui would be a massive boost for the club

[Rogue 585]

Old news, lets move on.