Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

First list update for the year 2025!

I am listing Moniz-wakefield as a "Cat.A Rookie" I know there is some confusion as to this, It is possible he is still a "Cat.B Rookie"

this means we have 1 position available for a "Cat.B' player (this is to be confirmed as it may actually be three "Cat B" positions now!)

OR

we have 1 "Cat A" rookie spot left (and possibly 1 "Cat B" if the AFL have indeed increased the limit to three)

Hopefully the Club will Update us at some stage as to Moniz-Wakefield's Status

Quote

In addition to these six rookie-listed players, each club can include up to three additional players (now referred to as Category B rookies) on its Rookie List provided the player either:

 

ScreenShot2024-11-22at2_51_43pm.png.233ddca2917388f92e3798fd90481e24.png

 

 

 

 
 
  • Author

@Demonland

 

Can we please pin this thread for the new season

 

Cheers

Brian

 

"Big max... like the hamburgers?, no not like the [censored] hamburgers"  The 12th man

 

my emote is Mr. Gone. from the brilliant animation, the Maxx

Mr Gone, The Maxx

Max Gawn

see what i did there... lol

sorry i has been drinking

anyway, pin this thread please :)

 

Edited by red and blue forever

How did Lindsay and Langford get 3 year deals? I thought it was 2 when you get drafted?

 
  • Author
4 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

How did Lindsay and Langford get 3 year deals? I thought it was 2 when you get drafted?

Rule Change this year... 3 Years for picks under 20, 2 years for the rest :)

Edited by red and blue forever


Allowed 2 B-Rookies.

2023 CBA

image.png.d91eaa19b919d3fc0b58604122256a8a.png

To clarify the rookie tenure rules.

Somewhere on DL it was assumed the new 5 year/10 AFL game rule does not apply to B rookies.  I've found nothing from the AFL/AFLPA nor any club to support that assumption.   

The assumption was that, because a media report listed AMW as an A rookie, the new rule doesn't/can't apply to B rookies.  That 'logic' doesn't compute as there may be other reasons AMW is no longer a B rookie eg because the club needed two B rookie spots to draft Andrew and Mentha.  The status change for AMW would be a timing coincidence not because the new rule doesn't apply to B rookies. 

Edited by Lucifers Hero

  • Author
3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Allowed 2 B-Rookies.

2023 CBA

image.png.d91eaa19b919d3fc0b58604122256a8a.png

yeah, this makes me confused,  https://www.afl.com.au/about-afl/rookie-players

Quote

In addition to these six rookie-listed players, each club can include up to three additional players (now referred to as Category B rookies) on its Rookie List provided the player either:

so I am unsure if this is new and we can have 3 B rookies?,

either the 2023 CBA is out of date, or the AFL website is out of date...

 

 
1 hour ago, red and blue forever said:

yeah, this makes me confused,  https://www.afl.com.au/about-afl/rookie-players

so I am unsure if this is new and we can have 3 B rookies?,

either the 2023 CBA is out of date, or the AFL website is out of date...

 

The AFL often do not date their releases so should be used with caution. That link is very old; definitely pre covid.

The 2023 CBA is the current 'bible'.   It runs until 2027 with adjustments as and when announced.

Edited by Lucifers Hero


Can someone clarify if we can list Noah Yze? Surprised no one has asked JT. 

Just now, Dannyz said:

Can someone clarify if we can list Noah Yze? Surprised no one has asked JT. 

As AMW appears to be an A Rookie the answer no, as we don't have a list spot.

  • Author

It would be wonderful if the club would be nice enough to update us re AMW...

probably asking a bit much

Edited by red and blue forever

Can anyone confirm if we have a full list, or do we still have room for potential SSP or mid season spots? 


  • Author
9 minutes ago, Click_Bate said:

Can anyone confirm if we have a full list, or do we still have room for potential SSP or mid season spots? 

We only have 1 Cat B rookie spot available

37 minutes ago, red and blue forever said:

We only have 1 Cat B rookie spot available

Agree. We didnt have a pick in the rookie draft which meant our a list is full. If we had a spot we cpuld have passed to keep it free.

We are rolling with 43 players this year including mentha as our sole cat b. 

Complete buffoon when it comes to these things but we lost 8 players and only gained 6…. So if we only have one spot left I’m utterly confused

12 hours ago, MrReims said:

Complete buffoon when it comes to these things but we lost 8 players and only gained 6…. So if we only have one spot left I’m utterly confused

The buffoons are the AFL that have so many vague rules around player categories and list management.

Your count is correct for end of season changes. 

The difference is Kentfield was our notional 'replacement' for Brayshaw in the mid-season draft.  Brayshaw remained on the list giving an overall list of 45, one over the allowed 44. 

So now we need to 'lose' one more than we gain to get back to 44.

Edited by Lucifers Hero


2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

The buffoons are the AFL that have so many vague rules around player categories and list management.

Your count is correct for end of season changes. 

The difference is Kentfield was our notional 'replacement' for Brayshaw in the mid-season draft.  Brayshaw remained on the list giving an overall list of 45, one over the allowed 44. 

So now we need to 'lose' one more than we gain to get back to 44.

Copy that! Very much appreciate it

happy to be called out on this for being wrong or jumping too early, but i like to document my thoughts a year out and see how close i think to the actual list managers

for EOS 25

Retire: Melksham, McDonald

Delist: Hore, Fullarton, Billings, Howes, AMW, Sestan

Laurie to move down to rookie list too with a 2026 contract

McDonald could get another 1yr, Campbell could be 1 and done

Feel like Howes, AMW and Woey are playing for one maybe two spots on the list, woey the most versatile

Could also see a McAdam pay out like Hunter this year, its not beyond us to make these moves

10 hours ago, Turner said:

happy to be called out on this for being wrong or jumping too early, but i like to document my thoughts a year out and see how close i think to the actual list managers

for EOS 25

Retire: Melksham, McDonald

Delist: Hore, Fullarton, Billings, Howes, AMW, Sestan

Laurie to move down to rookie list too with a 2026 contract

McDonald could get another 1yr, Campbell could be 1 and done

Feel like Howes, AMW and Woey are playing for one maybe two spots on the list, woey the most versatile

Could also see a McAdam pay out like Hunter this year, its not beyond us to make these moves

Howes delisted? kidding yourself 

 
13 hours ago, Turner said:

happy to be called out on this for being wrong or jumping too early, but i like to document my thoughts a year out and see how close i think to the actual list managers

for EOS 25

Retire: Melksham, McDonald

Delist: Hore, Fullarton, Billings, Howes, AMW, Sestan

Laurie to move down to rookie list too with a 2026 contract

McDonald could get another 1yr, Campbell could be 1 and done

Feel like Howes, AMW and Woey are playing for one maybe two spots on the list, woey the most versatile

Could also see a McAdam pay out like Hunter this year, its not beyond us to make these moves

Agree with a number of players Turner  but not on Howes and AMW believe these two are in our long term plans as is Woey but time will tell.

Edited by DeeZone
Added Turner


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 138 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 38 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 315 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Love
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 907 replies