Jump to content

Featured Replies

Tim Lamb has said we won't be going down the delisted free agent path this year.

Put a line through him.

 
On 16/10/2024 at 14:11, DeeSpencer said:

Mids: Viney, Oliver, Tracc, Rivers, Sparrow

Wings: Langdon, Windsor, Billings

HHFs: Kolt, Sharp, Laurie

Smalls: Pickett, Chandler, Spargo

Developmental: Brown, Sestan, Woey?, AMW?

There’s certainly room for one more midfielder, ideally someone with some forward attributes. 

But I wouldn’t be in a rush. If 5 and 9 go on mids or half forwards we can probably hope at least one of them is ready to contribute 

Agree we could do with some more midfield depth, but I have some serious question marks with some of the above:

After only a few rounds in, Billings didn't really look close.  Can he put in a killer pre-season somehow and turn his career around at a late age like T Mac?  I've got my doubts, but you never know.

After pleanty of opportunities at senior level Laurrie just doesn't look to cut it for mine.  I'd much rather put more game time and give opportunities to guys like Woey and Doggy Brown Jnr.

Was interesting to see Judd McVee given some midfield time late in the season and if AMW can keep performing in defence, perhaps that opens up an oppertunity for Judd to spend more time as a mid?

19 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Agree we could do with some more midfield depth, but I have some serious question marks with some of the above:

After only a few rounds in, Billings didn't really look close.  Can he put in a killer pre-season somehow and turn his career around at a late age like T Mac?  I've got my doubts, but you never know.

After pleanty of opportunities at senior level Laurrie just doesn't look to cut it for mine.  I'd much rather put more game time and give opportunities to guys like Woey and Doggy Brown Jnr.

Was interesting to see Judd McVee given some midfield time late in the season and if AMW can keep performing in defence, perhaps that opens up an oppertunity for Judd to spend more time as a mid?

Billings and Laurie shouldn’t be on AFL lists, or at least not ours. But given they are we probably have to lean on them as depth rather than add in more depth players. Obviously we hope young guys come through ahead of them if they don’t improve. I still have some small hope for Laurie if he adds a more physical edge now he’s starting to become a man not a boy. Small hope.

I’d actually return AMW to the forwards this season because we need someone else with some speed and spark. Either way he needs a big preseason to get an afl level tank, if that happens he might be something.

 

With Tommo delisted it means we may of changed our minds on the SSP or DELISTED FA path — depends on Hore 

Personally I’d of preferred we added one more mid for depth but still seems less likely  

27 minutes ago, Tolstoys Nudge said:

With Tommo delisted it means we may of changed our minds on the SSP or DELISTED FA path — depends on Hore 

Personally I’d of preferred we added one more mid for depth but still seems less likely  

I'm not really sure if I've worked it out properly, and it can be tricky as the make up of numbers between senior list and rookie list are somewhat flexible, but as it stands I think we will have 3 spots to fill through either the rookie draft or with delisted free agents.

McVee needs to be upgraded due to the 10 game clause I think, so that could be done with that really late end of the draft pick (we don't have to do it that way, but it would mean we meet that 3 pick minimum criteria). The other rookies I assume will stay as rookies, meaning we will have 6 (if Hore is retained). From what I can gather, 6 is the maximum number of category A rookies you can have.

It's a bit messy, and I may not have worked this out correctly, but my guess for our offseason is something like this:

Brayshaw - Kentfield (R)
Schache - Campbell
ANB - Sharp
Hunter - Pick 5 (Smith?)
Brown - Pick 9 (Armstrong?)
Tomlinson - DFA (Ethan Phillips?)
Smith (not yet delisted, but surely?) - DFA (Parfitt?)

KFW (Cat B) - Mentha (Cat B)

Hore - Retain

McVee upgrade to make up the required 3 picks.


2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Tim Lamb has said we won't be going down the delisted free agent path this year.

Put a line through him.

When did he say that? We already picked up Campbell.

1 hour ago, FreedFromDesire said:

I'm not really sure if I've worked it out properly, and it can be tricky as the make up of numbers between senior list and rookie list are somewhat flexible, but as it stands I think we will have 3 spots to fill through either the rookie draft or with delisted free agents.

McVee needs to be upgraded due to the 10 game clause I think, so that could be done with that really late end of the draft pick (we don't have to do it that way, but it would mean we meet that 3 pick minimum criteria). The other rookies I assume will stay as rookies, meaning we will have 6 (if Hore is retained). From what I can gather, 6 is the maximum number of category A rookies you can have.

It's a bit messy, and I may not have worked this out correctly, but my guess for our offseason is something like this:

Brayshaw - Kentfield (R)
Schache - Campbell
ANB - Sharp
Hunter - Pick 5 (Smith?)
Brown - Pick 9 (Armstrong?)
Tomlinson - DFA (Ethan Phillips?)
Smith (not yet delisted, but surely?) - DFA (Parfitt?)

KFW (Cat B) - Mentha (Cat B)

Hore - Retain

McVee upgrade to make up the required 3 picks.

Don’t forget Andy Moniz-Wakefield.😁

23 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

When did he say that? We already picked up Campbell.

His after trade period press conference interview with the media.

 
3 hours ago, FreedFromDesire said:

I had him included among the rookies. I think because he's played less than 10 games he can go onto the rookie list for another year. They may choose to upgrade him though I guess.

Additional after thought - Just realized you may have meant because he's a cat B rookie I think?

Yes FFD Cat B at present.


17 hours ago, 58er said:

Still need mid field depth  refer this season with Trac  out and Clarry injured and fitness issue as year evolved. Need Rivers Kossie Kolt and the duke at centre not wing to raise the pace and aggression level of our mids 

 Agreed, but we also need Plans B, C and D, more diversity, more movement up forward, more mongrel and fewer 'favourites' playing when others may well be in better form. 

On 16/10/2024 at 15:56, layzie said:

Must be a Francophile kind of day today. 

My director is in France currently but he's had some kind of food poisoning and isn't too well. I've getting morning emails with nothing but French pleasantries. Usually a no nonsense no faff kind of guy so he's definitely lost the plot. 

Well, that's what happens when you LEAN into French PASTRIES!

 

(Think about it...)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 83 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 169 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 532 replies