Judd on Brown

[WonnaJurah 5]

i didnt see the incident but it looks like judd could be out of brownlow after trying to use cambell brown as a bowling ball

thoughts?

[45HG 1,559]

for mine that is a fair enough reason not too go.

i think the people referred to in these sorts of threads are those who live close enough to go, can afford it, but chose to watch it on tv, but then claim to be hardcore supporters and who are willing to have a go at the club about things. if you really love your club and love the footy you would go to the games if you can.

maybe watch the incident before starting a thread on it

[demonfanjezza 1]

I saw the pics in the paper-- there was nothing in it

[Gorgoroth 13,019]

who can tell what the tribunal will make of it

might get 2 might get 8, hell i wouldnt be surprised if they cited brown for putting his eye on judd's finger!

[demonfanjezza 1]

hell i wouldnt be surprised if they cited brown for putting his eye on judd's finger!

Thats could be true

[QueenC 74]

Sorry, but it didn't look too good to me

Hands in the face is always going to look ugly and he did have them in, or very near to, Browns eye.

Now I realise that it is Chris Judd and all, with the media and commentator astonishment that he may do something like this aside

But it should definitely be looked at long and hard...... And probably punished.

[sideshowbob 0]

maybe watch the incident before starting a thread on it

Or perhaps it's okay to start a thread to find out what people who DID see the incident think of it, and thereby get a different perspective. Meh.

My conspiracy theory is that Campbell Brown is coming out and defending Judd because the Tasmania Hawks want Judd to play against the Gold Coast Roos next week to assist the Eagles in getting a win over a team that might rival the hawks for a finals spot this year.

[Guest redandbluethruandthru]

saw it . deserves at least 4 weeks imo. but its judd so just a warning...... if it was say miller he would be out for 8 weeks tribunal is pissweak

[Jumping Jack Clennett 1,809]

saw it . deserves at least 4 weeks imo. but its judd so just a warning...... if it was say miller he would be out for 8 weeks tribunal is pissweak

Looked terrible. Was terrible.

Will definitely get off.

[45HG 1,559]

article in the sun today saying the eagles are 'super-confident' he'll get off. how do the eagles get away with running the competition their own way. clubs get fined for abusing umpires, why shouldn't the eagles be fined for pressuring the match review committee. joke.

[Jaded No More 68,974]

He'll get off because he'll get up and say "Hi, my name is Chris Judd, you might remember me from my on-field heroics at the WEST COAST EAGLES".

[dees_rule_4eva 22]

Based on the vision I saw, he should be suspended. It was of the same level of Holland vs Johnson ... and Holland got a reprimand. At least a one game suspension should occur, with the option of a reprimand because of his good record.

If you look on the replay, Sam Mitchell didn't like what he saw.

[QueenC 74]

He'll get off because he'll get up and say "Hi, my name is Chris Judd, you might remember me from my on-field heroics at the WEST COAST EAGLES".

Sad, but true !!!

And it may have started already ......

Brown says Judd did not Eye Gouge

[WonnaJurah 5]

just heard on mm he has been offered one week and 100 pointys ,which means he is gone unless he uses the chewbacca defense ,then he might be a chance