Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, COOLX said:

What would be ironic if Weed leaves year's end , he goes to Norf and we get a number one draft pick who happens to be an injury free Rowell or another Petracca. On top of it the Weed ends up like Tyson. ( TYson who you may say ).

How will we get a number one draft pick in this scenario?

 

Edited by faultydet

 
19 hours ago, adonski said:

Is Tom Sparrow just Jack Viney with footy IQ?

Spot on he just not a rugby player.

7 hours ago, Altona-demon said:

Weidemann was very good and did all the team things.  He could have easily kicked 7 if he was more selfish.

He'll play - but let's see him play more and more footy consistently.  He is so clearly far too good for this level though.

It can't be good for his long term development to keep beating up on part time footballers. 

Tmac has surprised everyone with his form this year. He has been excellent. If Bbb and Sw were right to go from r1 there is the chance that Tom may have not played.

I believe Tom has been back to his best . At his best he is one of top forwards going around. Hes only 27 so has a few years left in him.

L. Jackson has reached new heights and made it a double whammy.

It will be interesting to see how it pans out this weekend. 

Unfortunately someone is going to have to sit in the stands each week as we cant have all four play.

It is a great insurance against injuries and poor form.

Yet if nobodys injured and they all play well then its going to be strange and a trade may arise. 

I hope not. I get feeling SW is going to be a big star.

From left field if May or Lever were injured, Tom is as proven quality backman and not out of the realm he goes back there.

 

Had a look at the replay on Kayo.  The biggest conclusion we can draw is that North are in real trouble.  The lack of any sort of depth is strongly reminiscent of us at our worst half a dozen years ago.  They have nothing in their key positions, but that's ok because they have almost nothing in the  middle as well and most of that is nearing the end of their careers. 

For our side, congratulations on whoever it was talking up Deakyn Smith during the off-season.  He looks to be a very nice prospect.  Give him a year or two to build his body and I could see him in the senior side.  Sparrow delivers beautifully to the forwards and seems to work well with the Weed, who is of course dominating at VFL level.  I get why they put Brown in for this week, but Weed is very stiff to be left out. 

Really though, there's to much you can take out of a game like that.  They were that bad and we were professional and well-organised and took them apart. 


25 minutes ago, chookrat said:

So when do Casey play v North? With the AFL match in Hobart I wouldn't mind getting along to the VFL.

Last night. 

I  have a feeling Norf will put us out of form. We will win comfortably but play not as well as I would like.

 
12 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

I  have a feeling Norf will put us out of form. We will win comfortably but play not as well as I would like.

I'm not overly concerned right now. We're 30% into the season. What we need to do is just keep winning. It's important especially to make sure we beat the teams we should beat like North Melbourne  We can worry about form heading into the finals, once we've made it. 

15 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Tmac has surprised everyone with his form this year. He has been excellent. If Bbb and Sw were right to go from r1 there is the chance that Tom may have not played.

I believe Tom has been back to his best . At his best he is one of top forwards going around. Hes only 27 so has a few years left in him.

L. Jackson has reached new heights and made it a double whammy.

It will be interesting to see how it pans out this weekend. 

Unfortunately someone is going to have to sit in the stands each week as we cant have all four play.

It is a great insurance against injuries and poor form.

Yet if nobodys injured and they all play well then its going to be strange and a trade may arise. 

I hope not. I get feeling SW is going to be a big star.

From left field if May or Lever were injured, Tom is as proven quality backman and not out of the realm he goes back there.

Tom McDonald won't we going back unless we have major backline injuries. When Steven May was out injured/concussed they brought Harry Petty in which they'll do again if needed. Unless 2 out of May/Lever/Tomlinson are out TMac won't be going back and probably not even then. He could go on the wing with Brayshaw replacing James Jordon or Nathan Jones.  


1 hour ago, Sydney_Demon said:

Tom McDonald won't we going back unless we have major backline injuries. When Steven May was out injured/concussed they brought Harry Petty in which they'll do again if needed. Unless 2 out of May/Lever/Tomlinson are out TMac won't be going back and probably not even then. He could go on the wing with Brayshaw replacing James Jordon or Nathan Jones.  

Agreed but its good that if May and Lever went down, Tom could replace one of them.

He was always an excellent defender.

And we certainly have enough tall fwds to replace him.

Would love to see him on the wing as a roving back man and chf player. 

4 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Agreed but its good that if May and Lever went down, Tom could replace one of them.

He was always an excellent defender.

And we certainly have enough tall fwds to replace him.

Would love to see him on the wing as a roving back man and chf player. 

If Lever and May went down, you would have Petty replace Lever and have Tomlinson roll into Mays role, Hibbard play last line ( in Tomlinson’s spot) and bring in Jetta as well as Petty...

 

... before you’d have TMac go to the backline again. Take him too long to relearn their system. 

 

Edited by PaulRB

On 4/30/2021 at 8:34 AM, Whispering_Jack said:

The new look VFL with its 22 teams is beginning to look lopsided and problematic. The fact that each team plays 16 matches and therefore won’t play 5 of the other teams during the regular season could lead to inequities when it comes to deciding the finals. 

This is not the ideal competition.

Actually more like a dog’s dinner. 
Who made this call?  AFL or VFL, or the mighty $$$? Or FOX?
The talent pool is just spread way too thin, and to have guys who have an actual real job being expected to fly interstate regularly is just not on. 

On 5/1/2021 at 9:22 PM, monoccular said:

Actually more like a dog’s dinner. 
Who made this call?  AFL or VFL, or the mighty $$$? Or FOX?
The talent pool is just spread way too thin, and to have guys who have an actual real job being expected to fly interstate regularly is just not on. 

Your last point is a good one. I hadn't really thought about that aspect. Someone else mentioned that it's tough programming Thursday (or even Friday) night games for non-professionals for the same reason. Another tough thing for VFL players affiliated with AFL clubs is not being able to play regularly. There's 43 players on Melbourne's AFL list and 30 in Casey's VFL squad but, even with 6 Melbourne players injured and 3 kept in reserve for Sunday in case of injuries and/or as a potential Melbourne sub, 12 AFL-listed players played for Casey. Doesn't leave much space for Casey players.     

On 5/1/2021 at 6:25 PM, PaulRB said:

If Lever and May went down, you would have Petty replace Lever and have Tomlinson roll into Mays role, Hibbard play last line ( in Tomlinson’s spot) and bring in Jetta as well as Petty...

 

... before you’d have TMac go to the backline again. Take him too long to relearn their system. 

 

Now Tomlinson has gone down long-term we need a ling-term replacement. Harry Petty or should we bite the bullet and keep T-Mac down there so we can bring Weideman in?


33 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

Now Tomlinson has gone down long-term we need a ling-term replacement. Harry Petty or should we bite the bullet and keep T-Mac down there so we can bring Weideman in?

Petty would be my preference, simply because he’s trained all preseason with the defensive unit, and deserves a crack.

TMac has been good forward and ok pitch hitting down back, I’d leave him further up the ground. 

2 minutes ago, PaulRB said:

Petty would be my preference, simply because he’s trained all preseason with the defensive unit, and deserves a crack.

TMac has been good forward and ok pitch hitting down back, I’d leave him further up the ground. 

Well, Petty did get a crack when May was out for a week, but I agree once the decision has been made we need to stick with whoever is chosen medium to long-term.     

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 528 replies