Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

As we take the trip down to Kardinia Park this weekend it is worthwhile remembering that sucker clubs such as ourselves actually benefit the Cats by a lot more per crowd member than the likes of Collingwood and Richmond.

This is a quote from Brian Cook in 2009 which probably holds doubly true nearly ten years later:

Originally Posted by Brian Cook
...at Skilled Stadium when you have a capacity of 25,000, we make a net profit in that game of $638,000 per game, which is $26 per head. If we have a crowd of 85,500 at the MCG, which we did have against Collingwood in 2007, we brought home $771,000, which was $9 a head. Importantly,Telstra, now Etihad Stadium, with a near capacity of 46,000, we brought home $293,000, which is $6 a head. So when you compare a crowd at Skilled of 25,000 compared to Telstra, which is nearly twice as much at 46, you at Skilled bring home to the club $638,000 out of all revenue sources per game and only $293,000 from Telstra.

Source Bigfooty thread; https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stadium-deals-what-how-when-why-we-need-a-new-one-and-the-sa-footy-paradigm-shift-happening.554729/

Edited by Diamond_Jim

 

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

4 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

 

Well we aren't alone... I recall I read somewhere that we got a better deal under Steven Smith but can't find it anywhere.....

Also its part of why the AFL has an equalisation fund. Other teams scream about 'poorer' teams receiving money but in reality this is part of the reason it is there.


  • Author
1 minute ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

you may joke OD but I am sure the number crunchers at Essendon, Collingwood and Richmond salivate at owning a stadium between them.

It's amazing how the MCG has been able to dictate terms to the AFL and the clubs over the years.

9 minutes ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

 

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

 
3 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

 

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

I am not BB but as there is nothing available anywhere else Casey might win by default. It would be easier to get from VB!

Edited by old dee

1 hour ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $


  • Author
23 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $

worked for a large American corporation.

I asked one of the high ups in the States one day... why don't you have an office in Washington DC.

Answer... no Senators in DC

2 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

And just to rub it in.. taxpayer funds funded around 75% of the cost of the upgrade to Kardinia Park

Oh gawwwd please don't, Diamond.

Not to mention that it's 2019 and we still don't have a freakin permanent, dedicated home base!! 

5 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

The Mcc are laughing...  hand in hand with their Bank Managers. all clubs add to their coffers.  

More than 6 months of each and every year.

  • Author
4 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $

The electorate of Casey is relatively safe LNP but it has little to do with Casey Fields. It centres more around Belgrave and the Yarra Valley.

 Pakenham was in the federal district of Mc Millan which has now changed to Monash ( first vote in 2019) but I think only part of Pakenham is now in that electorate.

PS.. seems that Pakenham is now in Latrobe... projected LNP margin of 3.5%

https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-redistribution-2018/vic/

Edited by Diamond_Jim


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 135 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 177 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Shocked
      • Love
      • Like
    • 533 replies