Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

As we take the trip down to Kardinia Park this weekend it is worthwhile remembering that sucker clubs such as ourselves actually benefit the Cats by a lot more per crowd member than the likes of Collingwood and Richmond.

This is a quote from Brian Cook in 2009 which probably holds doubly true nearly ten years later:

Originally Posted by Brian Cook
...at Skilled Stadium when you have a capacity of 25,000, we make a net profit in that game of $638,000 per game, which is $26 per head. If we have a crowd of 85,500 at the MCG, which we did have against Collingwood in 2007, we brought home $771,000, which was $9 a head. Importantly,Telstra, now Etihad Stadium, with a near capacity of 46,000, we brought home $293,000, which is $6 a head. So when you compare a crowd at Skilled of 25,000 compared to Telstra, which is nearly twice as much at 46, you at Skilled bring home to the club $638,000 out of all revenue sources per game and only $293,000 from Telstra.

Source Bigfooty thread; https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stadium-deals-what-how-when-why-we-need-a-new-one-and-the-sa-footy-paradigm-shift-happening.554729/

Edited by Diamond_Jim

 

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

4 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

 

Well we aren't alone... I recall I read somewhere that we got a better deal under Steven Smith but can't find it anywhere.....

Also its part of why the AFL has an equalisation fund. Other teams scream about 'poorer' teams receiving money but in reality this is part of the reason it is there.


  • Author
1 minute ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

you may joke OD but I am sure the number crunchers at Essendon, Collingwood and Richmond salivate at owning a stadium between them.

It's amazing how the MCG has been able to dictate terms to the AFL and the clubs over the years.

9 minutes ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

 

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

 
3 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

 

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

I am not BB but as there is nothing available anywhere else Casey might win by default. It would be easier to get from VB!

Edited by old dee

1 hour ago, old dee said:

Time to move from the G jnr?

How about a nice new stadium at Casey?

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $


  • Author
23 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $

worked for a large American corporation.

I asked one of the high ups in the States one day... why don't you have an office in Washington DC.

Answer... no Senators in DC

2 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

And just to rub it in.. taxpayer funds funded around 75% of the cost of the upgrade to Kardinia Park

Oh gawwwd please don't, Diamond.

Not to mention that it's 2019 and we still don't have a freakin permanent, dedicated home base!! 

5 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Yep. We barely make a dollar on a 25,000 crowd at the G. Geelong get all of the corporate box revenue, advertising, a big chink of food and bev etc.

Teams that have 'clean' stadiums cream it in terms of revenue. Adelaide, West Coast etc.

It means a West Coast can spend in the order of $300,000 a week (!) more than melbourne. Thats one reason the soft spending cap was brought in

Two of the biggest problems in the AFL. Stadium deals and the fixture.

The Mcc are laughing...  hand in hand with their Bank Managers. all clubs add to their coffers.  

More than 6 months of each and every year.

  • Author
4 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Is Casey in a marginal seat? That's how to get the big $

The electorate of Casey is relatively safe LNP but it has little to do with Casey Fields. It centres more around Belgrave and the Yarra Valley.

 Pakenham was in the federal district of Mc Millan which has now changed to Monash ( first vote in 2019) but I think only part of Pakenham is now in that electorate.

PS.. seems that Pakenham is now in Latrobe... projected LNP margin of 3.5%

https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-redistribution-2018/vic/

Edited by Diamond_Jim


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 111 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 31 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 315 replies