Jump to content

Nathan Vardy anyone??


Grimes Times


Recommended Posts

Posted

Is the perfect type we are missing to play 2nd ruck/tall fwd. Is very injury prone but might be a bit of risk and reward. Behind Hawkins Stanley smith even maybe Clarke in Geelongs team. Thoughts???  



Posted
1 hour ago, Roger Mellie said:

Would love him, but would potentially miss 16-22 weeks a year through injury - like every other year!

So that's a no

Hahaha 

so well put

if a player is Behind Clark in relevance i think that is a clear

"Next...Don't call us, we'll call you..."


Posted

NO.

His hips & knees are cactus.

Surprised that he ever played another game, but there's also a reason Geelong have loaded up on so many bigs.

Posted

Not against it for the righg price, as when he's injury free he's quite a talented player.

Issue is, I don't see him, Hogan, Watts & Weideman all fitting into the same forward line.

Posted
48 minutes ago, AngryAtCasey said:

Not against it for the righg price, as when he's injury free he's quite a talented player.

Issue is, I don't see him, Hogan, Watts & Weideman all fitting into the same forward line.

Also Dawes, Pederson and Hulett! (Plus Petracca, Garlett and Kent/Harmes to also fit somewhere)



Posted

Majak Daw still not strong enough,gets pushed off the ball too easily. Vardy is damaged goods,probably not many games left in him.

Posted
9 minutes ago, ENYAW said:

Majak Daw still not strong enough,gets pushed off the ball too easily. Vardy is damaged goods,probably not many games left in him.

Geelong seem to take a very conservative approach with their injured players, if he can't get up for them, I think it's too risky. Even as a DFA (if he comes to that), I think the clubs time and effort could be better spent.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...