Grimes Times 1,278 Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 Is the perfect type we are missing to play 2nd ruck/tall fwd. Is very injury prone but might be a bit of risk and reward. Behind Hawkins Stanley smith even maybe Clarke in Geelongs team. Thoughts???
Roger Mellie 4,205 Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 Would love him, but would potentially miss 16-22 weeks a year through injury - like every other year! So that's a no
Sir Why You Little 37,478 Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Roger Mellie said: Would love him, but would potentially miss 16-22 weeks a year through injury - like every other year! So that's a no Hahaha so well put if a player is Behind Clark in relevance i think that is a clear "Next...Don't call us, we'll call you..."
Mach5 4,768 Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 NO. His hips & knees are cactus. Surprised that he ever played another game, but there's also a reason Geelong have loaded up on so many bigs.
MadAsHell 4,217 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Not against it for the righg price, as when he's injury free he's quite a talented player. Issue is, I don't see him, Hogan, Watts & Weideman all fitting into the same forward line.
CBDees 3,167 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 48 minutes ago, AngryAtCasey said: Not against it for the righg price, as when he's injury free he's quite a talented player. Issue is, I don't see him, Hogan, Watts & Weideman all fitting into the same forward line. Also Dawes, Pederson and Hulett! (Plus Petracca, Garlett and Kent/Harmes to also fit somewhere)
ILLDieADemon 804 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 This guy is constantly injured. Why would we want him?
dazzledavey36 56,399 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Would rather Majak Daw who has a higher ceiling and not injury prone at all.
Ethan Tremblay 31,393 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Constantly injured and can't get a game at Geelong...it's a yes from me.
spirit of norm smith 16,681 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Only if he was delisted and we could offer a rookie spot. Big talent but too fragile given constantly injured.
junk 342 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Majak Daw still not strong enough,gets pushed off the ball too easily. Vardy is damaged goods,probably not many games left in him.
Ethan Tremblay 31,393 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 9 minutes ago, ENYAW said: Majak Daw still not strong enough,gets pushed off the ball too easily. Vardy is damaged goods,probably not many games left in him. Geelong seem to take a very conservative approach with their injured players, if he can't get up for them, I think it's too risky. Even as a DFA (if he comes to that), I think the clubs time and effort could be better spent.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.