Jump to content

The Jack Viney bump that never was!

Featured Replies

Sounds like they are doing well. Step through the vision, explain what the thought process was, and highlight how quickly it changed from being a 50:50 ball to "oh crap" brace myself then play on. All happened so quick and at no time did his actions indicate he was bumping someone, just reacting to the bounce of the ball and proximity of the other players.

 
17:48
Nathan Schmook:
AFL case is that he turned into Lynch's path at the last second

Why the F do the AFL need a case?

JV: After the collision "I end up going to win the football, which i was trying to do in the first place."

I love this kid.

 

Looking at the AFL 'live feed'

17:48
Nathan Schmook:
AFL case is that he turned into Lynch's path at the last second

Why the F do the AFL need a case?

Exactly what I was thinking. Why is the AFL set up as a prosecutor. Surely that is not appropriate. The panel should be just trying to discover the truth.

17:50
Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson sas he could have avoided contact by pushing off his left foot and getting out of the road.
17:50
Nathan Schmook:
Whether that's what a footballer should do is a different matter...

Who the f is this Gleeson clown


Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson sas he could have avoided contact by pushing off his left foot and getting out of the road.

LMFAO

Gleeson is a class one fwit..obviously

 
17:50
Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson sas he could have avoided contact by pushing off his left foot and getting out of the road.

What exciting football that would be!

17:48
Nathan Schmook:
AFL case is that he turned into Lynch's path at the last second.
17:50
Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson sas he could have avoided contact by pushing off his left foot and getting out of the road.
17:50
Nathan Schmook:

Whether that's what a footballer should do is a different matter...

Oh no, this is not looking good

Edited by _becks_


17:54

Nathan Schmook: Running through multiple angles of the incident. Controversial case, clearly, being made here.

I'd say!

17:50
Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson sas he could have avoided contact by pushing off his left foot and getting out of the road.

Well that's not a reasonable alternative at all because it is unpalatable for a footballer to 'get out of the road' when the football is there to be won.

17:55
Nathan Schmook:

Gleeson now proposing he could have spun out of the collision.

Holy [censored]. This can not be serious.


Nathan Schmook:
Gleeson now proposing he could have spun out of the collision.

Agree. He could also have done a Matrix style lean back, slowing down time, allowing him to sum up the situation before leaping up over Lynch with a triple somersault in the air while landing on his feet behind Georgiou.

yeah, spin and then you would have no idea what hit you. His point is so stupid he could be cunningly arguing for the defence.

17:55

Nathan Schmook:

Gleeson now proposing he could have spun out of the collision.

Holy [censored]. This can not be serious.

Excuse me?

He should take his eyes off the collision and expose his back and the back of his head?

What is this nonsense?

Things are looking positive, if thats all the prosecution has got!


If we are all being honest Jack should have done a quick front flip to ensure all contact was avoided...

The way this Fwit gleeson is carrying on it doesn't look good.

 

We should start recruiting from the AFL's pool of legal counsel...

This is good if that's the best the other side can come up with. Tribunal will look like massive fools if they uphold the charge based on this garbage.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 77 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 19 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 21 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Like
    • 282 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Shocked
      • Thumb Down
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies