Another Melbourne supporter (the advertising person who WebJet use) brings home the goods, well done WebJet.

The camera guy seems totally incapable of locating McLardy, even though Garry and Brayshaw keep indicating to show him.

Complete ineptitude.

That logo is gigantic

Now for back of the jumper, hopefully before end of the season

I imagine it became on of Webjet's terms and we weren't really in a situation of power at the negotiation table.

I could care less about the aesthetic qualities of their logo.

Logo will look better when it's not stuck over the top of the reach one and is the same colour as the jumper.

the logo will look 100x better when its not just some sticker slapped on the guernsey

Webjet will become a major sponsor.

.They will become a front sponsor for a year with an option of another two years.

No mention of Eddie .

Edited April 12, 201213 yr by jayceebee31

Only took 24hrs also, 1 year deal with an option for another 2.

No word of Eddie, Webjet called Cameron Schwab and it was done in a day.

Good news

Only took 24hrs also, 1 year deal with an option for another 2.

No word of Eddie, Webjet called Cameron Schwab and it was done in a day.

Good news

Why didn't Schwab call them?

Why didn't Schwab call them?

He will call every company in the whole country will he?

another option would be asking him yourself if it is such an issue?

Website already updated, dont mined the big banner, but agree the colour doesnt suit our red on the jumper.....but them the apples who cares

edit and the link

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/

Edited April 12, 201213 yr by Jordie_tackles

It would be great if the actual logo is just the plane/mouse thing without the big red box. Our Primus logo was great because it was just the name, with no distracting colours around it. Pumped to get a sponsor, and I'm interested to see how the final image will look. Also, Trenners made a pretty big stuff-up mentioning the old sponsor by name. I would imagine that would be the first thing he would have been told not to do before coming onto the show. It doesn't really matter, but I'd like to distance the club from that old mob as much as possible.

I too thought the logo was enormous. I get the feeling this is just temporary though, that they just wanted to the team tops out as quickly as possible but didn't want to fiddle around too much with the size. It's clearly not printed on, so the batch of proper tops I reckon will have better dimensions.

Great stuff Webjet!

Edited April 12, 201213 yr by Pates

Does that make us the DWEEBS?

Great news. Just booked my Europe trip with them last week too!

Well done to the club for getting this sorted quick smart. One week without a sponsor given the circumstances is unbelievable really.

The logo does look too big but there is no doubt it's just some sticker they ironed on. They'll probably hold off to get the back sorted before getting the merchandise printed. That stuff costs money to set up. You'll be paying for every new print screen you request.

New member here, and probably won't post much, but this is great news. Webjet is a company going places, just like the Demons.

I'm going to be ramming webjet down the throat of everyone I come into contact with for the next month.

They're gonna be sick of hearing it.

Webjet.

Logo looks terrible! too big!

No pleasing some people! Even good news must have a down side.

I think it is great...some good news at last. At win at the weekend will keep a smile on my face

Now for the real question, what deals will us members get offered?

Could be goooood haha

The tweets coming out from the club say"joint major sponsor"... what exactly does that mean? Can we expect a follow-up announcement in the not too distant future regarding another sponsor?

He will call every company in the whole country will he?

another option would be asking him yourself if it is such an issue?

It's part of his job, isn't it? As for asking him myself, I'm dubious about the poster who is supposed to be CS is actually CS.

It's part of his job, isn't it? As for asking him myself, I'm dubious about the poster who is supposed to be CS is actually CS.

Based on what?