Jump to content

Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

Featured Replies

  • Author

There will be two pictures of things going forward.

Reality...this happening behind closed doors and shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!

And the media creation , based on anything that looks halfway printable.

Mick will concentrate on the job at hand. His management will concentrate on his future.

There is no harm or foul in Micks people talking to anyone. Its a free world ( if you can afford it..lol )

 
  • Author

Yup - just depends if Mick worries about Eddies saber rattling which i would think not

I dont think Mick really worries about a whole lot ...do you ? ;)

I dont think Mick really worries about a whole lot ...do you ? ;)

nope - not a damn thing

 

Malthouse won't sit out the year. When you are out of footy you quickly become irrelevant and outdated. He won't do it to himself.

I also think that a big part of Collingwood wants him gone, to wipe the slate clean to avoid issues with Buckley and instability within the footy department.

It would not surprise me if Malthouse is at Melbourne next year. He wants to coach and he should be allowed to coach. It was Collingwood's choice to let him go, so he should be able to move on and coach elsewhere.

Malthouse has stated that he will not coach next year and I think he's pretty damned certain about it.

Joining another club is different and this is where the difference will be. He'll be somewhere but not with the filth.

  • Author

circumstances change !!! :rolleyes:

he wasnt lying at the time..( maybe )

hes entitled to change his mind.

Its all football doublespeak..lol


Malthouse has stated that he will not coach next year and I think he's pretty damned certain about it.

That's what I thought when Hird said something along those lines last year On the Couch, repeatedly.

Mick is loving being the snr coach of the Pies at the moment. He's a coach. He'll say whatever is required to ensure the performance of his players and his team is not compromised. Even lie through his teeth. He gives the same sacrifice and strength to his team that he demands from his players. That's what makes him a great coach.

I hope my imaginary crystal ball is correct.

MM leaves Collingwood to become Melbourne's, let's call it........."Football Adviser". Damn, call it anything but 'coach or 'football director'.

As this is a new position, the MFC are more than happy for the FA to contribute to training sessions and game day decisions. After all they are an 'adviser' of everything football. They should be in the coaches box, they're part of the football department.

Eddie can huff and puff all he likes because MM IS NOT COACHING. Therefore he is not going against his promise. Our Head Coach is Viney and MM is merely a sounding board his ideas.

I love my crystal ball.

 

That's what I thought when Hird said something along those lines last year On the Couch, repeatedly.

You're comparing apples with oranges there HT.

  • Author

Not really KIL . They all say one thing and do another . GL was NEVER going to be involved picking. a coach ! Guess what !! lol

One week at a time 


MM has been coaching for 20 years straight.

I think he'll be having a year off next year.

Just my opinion but MM will b coach at tiggers and nowhere else.

A friend of mine Is mikes nephew and tells me he's never wrong about these things and wouldn't put his reputation on the line unless he knew something. Which means two things, scully is gone, and malthouse will not be at collingwood next year.

Don't want Mick if he cant commit to us from next season.

I see no point in waiting for a coach to sit 12 months out.

I have a feeling that after this season he wont coach again.

I think once again well be caught on the hop and be the last to

have a coach appointed and we will scrape the bottom of the barrel.

The Last big fish we landed there were still dinosaurs.

Queens Birthday 2012 will be a sell out....

It will now become a big game for Collingwood, not just another Game.

Malthouse v Buckley..Bring it on.

Stuff waiting a year, we have all waited for long enough...Get Him.B)


When this was announced 2 years ago people knew it wouldnt work but then they managed to win a premiership and not much was said. Now its getting closer and now its being talked about.

The thing is Mick isnt a coaching director. Its not what he ever wanted to be. Sernior coaching is what he is good at. Also can you imagine Eddie coming to you saying that you will coach for the next 2 years then Nathan will take over. How does that sound. Of course Mick says yes. Can you imagine Mick saying no to that to Eddies face.

Also its funny how we havent heard Nthan come out and actually say he wants Mick there next year.

Mick loves being Bowed and Scraped to. that is why he won't like being the backroom power broker.. He wants the accolades for himSelf.

Small man syndrome

His gamestyle he's trying to implement& take further with extra, Not less interchange players suits the 'SuperCoach' , napoleonic syndrome.

It means he can play supermanager with a list full of NoNames moving from 'role to role'..... SELF!

It means the end of True Fullforwards, and The end of the slow but Dynamic Mid, like a Diesle Williams.... Incredibly with the reduction of 1 interchange, early in the season we started to see the resemblance of longer kicks, and some high marks returning. But nowhere near as many as we once did.

The Hawks game model is much better, and more inspiring. They just don't have a high flyer or 2.

A friend of mine Is mikes nephew and tells me he's never wrong about these things and wouldn't put his reputation on the line unless he knew something. Which means two things, scully is gone, and malthouse will not be at collingwood next year.

I agree with you pipefitter, and the smoke seems to be wafting that direction, but what isn't totally clear is whether he'd be a footy director with Us or Carlton?

Eddie would start laying Eggs, If Carlton nabbed him for next season, whilst they're (Pies) still in their 'Open Window'.

Malthouse has stated that he will not coach next year and I think he's pretty damned certain about it.

Joining another club is different and this is where the difference will be. He'll be somewhere but not with the filth.

I recall listening to 6PR Perth in 1999 when George GRJLUSICH and Karl LANGDON broke the news about a secret meeting Mick had with Eddie and he was going to be the Collingwood coach next year. Mick was in for his weekly segment and you could almost hear the steam coming out of his ears as he vehemently denied there was anything untoward with the meeting and as far as he was concerned he was contracted to coach West Coast in 2000 and that was the end of the issue. This all seems to be history repeating itself

Mick loves being Bowed and Scraped to. that is why he won't like being the backroom power broker.. He wants the accolades for himSelf.

Small man syndrome

His gamestyle he's trying to implement& take further with extra, Not less interchange players suits the 'SuperCoach' , napoleonic syndrome.

It means he can play supermanager with a list full of NoNames moving from 'role to role'..... SELF!

It means the end of True Fullforwards, and The end of the slow but Dynamic Mid, like a Diesle Williams.... Incredibly with the reduction of 1 interchange, early in the season we started to see the resemblance of longer kicks, and some high marks returning. But nowhere near as many as we once did.

The Hawks game model is much better, and more inspiring. They just don't have a high flyer or 2.

You have really got it in for Mick Malthouse haven't you...

I recall listening to 6PR Perth in 1999 when George GRJLUSICH and Karl LANGDON broke the news about a secret meeting Mick had with Eddie and he was going to be the Collingwood coach next year. Mick was in for his weekly segment and you could almost hear the steam coming out of his ears as he vehemently denied there was anything untoward with the meeting and as far as he was concerned he was contracted to coach West Coast in 2000 and that was the end of the issue. This all seems to be history repeating itself

And that just might be the case but he's been in the coaching game for another twelve years since then. Coupled with a few family issues that have added extra stress I can see him taking a year off, but I could be wrong.

Wouldn't have been like George stirring the shite up with anyone. God rest his soul.


ok Mick cant coach next year but any chance that he could be head of coaching same job as what collingwood have offered.

with viney our coach next year with Mick pulling all the strings then to take over as head coach at the end of next year ?

as they have said he will not be coaching any where next year.

he wants out at years end or so is said.

a year out of football is a long time with how quick the game can pass you bye

:wub:

and said he would love to coach MELBOURNE

I think he will coach Melbourne next year....Talk can be cheap compared to Wads of real Cash, & i think the MFC is ready to spend..

The Supporters haven't cleared a large debt for nothing.

I think he will coach Melbourne next year....Talk can be cheap compared to Wads of real Cash, & i think the MFC is ready to spend..

The Supporters haven't cleared a large debt for nothing.

agree and why cant he coach next year if he wants cause eddie says, remember when pies poached mick from west coast was saying right up till end of season that he wont be leaving then season finishes and bang he announces he is going 4 family reasons

 

is eddie the new Jeff wish he would shut up thomas did nothing wrong, thomas has signed ? no he has not, Mick is not coaching anywhere

we own the afl get real you are the reason every one hates the pies the lot of them are as one eyed and dumb as each other

You obviously do a solid impersonation though.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 46 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 289 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies