Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
16 hours ago, daisycutter said:

what's '10 days' cryptic for, red? i don't get this new countdown

It's so cryptic it actually means what it says.

 
  • Author
16 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Well sue the [censored] Red!

Thanks for drumming up some extra business.

  • Author

The recently departed ( thankfully not permanently) and the great garden hose.

 
4 hours ago, Redleg said:

That was one I was going to use. 

Stop braying about it!

  • Author
1 minute ago, Red and Bluebeard said:

Stop braying about it!

I'll hop on the bus Gus.


Do we have a new banner?

I can no longer see the Port player.

5 hours ago, Redleg said:

The recently departed ( thankfully not permanently) and the great garden hose.

Anyone good at Scottish accents?

Always handy when trenner make ya garden neeta. 

 
  • Author

Just trucking along. Not quick but faster than the ox.

At this time of year your  poor  Old Uncle is harassed by vino vendors offering their Christmas Specials.

One fellow, tried to gild the lily by offering a dozen stemless wine glasses if the purchase was at least 2 dozen bottles. He was  immediately dismissed and  told to [censored] off. I mean who the [censored] would use a stemless wine glass? 

Then I started to consider this matter in relation to the denizens of this intellectual thread.

Red  and WJ - lawyers. They would drink anything , anyway, provided it was free.

Biffen - Currently indisposed to due to massive drug issues. He thinks casks are fine wine provided they are colourful.

Earl Hood. I considered him a man of discernment and class but his recent habit of bathing in sake must call this into question.

Moonie. Claims to have an extensive cellar of fine wines but none have been produced in my presence.

dc. Haha lives in Borewood and shags old sheilas. Jim Beam with ice would be sophisticated for him.

Old dee. Well he only drinks free Pinot ( none of which has been shared, I might add) so he would probably  have no choice but to use the glass given to him.

pickett fence. Total lunatic. Would have no idea of sophistication or good taste.

Ernie . A dead alcoholic!

bbub - a tricky one - doesn't give much away. However, as he frequents this thread, he is guilty by association.

The Froger?   Pond scum is probably lapped up - so a stemless glass?

Anyone I've missed feel free to ask for an assessment.

 

[censored] me! Upon consideration, that wine vendor is due an apology!

He'll not get it of course!

Anyway [censored] you all!!


15 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

At this time of year your  poor  Old Uncle is harassed by vino vendors offering their Christmas Specials.

One fellow, tried to gild the lily by offering a dozen stemless wine glasses if the purchase was at least 2 dozen bottles. He was  immediately dismissed and  told to [censored] off. I mean who the [censored] would use a stemless wine glass? 

Then I started to consider this matter in relation to the denizens of this intellectual thread.

Red  and WJ - lawyers. They would drink anything , anyway, provided it was free.

Biffen - Currently indisposed to due to massive drug issues. He thinks casks are fine wine provided they are colourful.

Earl Hood. I considered him a man of discernment and class but his recent habit of bathing in sake must call this into question.

Moonie. Claims to have an extensive cellar of fine wines but none have been produced in my presence.

dc. Haha lives in Borewood and shags old sheilas. Jim Beam with ice would be sophisticated for him.

Old dee. Well he only drinks free Pinot ( none of which has been shared, I might add) so he would probably  have no choice but to use the glass given to him.

pickett fence. Total lunatic. Would have no idea of sophistication or good taste.

Ernie . A dead alcoholic!

bbub - a tricky one - doesn't give much away. However, as he frequents this thread, he is guilty by association.

The Froger?   Pond scum is probably lapped up - so a stemless glass?

Anyone I've missed feel free to ask for an assessment.

 

[censored] me! Upon consideration, that wine vendor is due an apology!

He'll not get it of course!

Anyway [censored] you all!!

If you don't mind Uncle, you make two wrong assumptions, that I am both dead and an alcoholic.

I prefer to be referred to as a "discerning dead alcoholic"

I have had periods of abstinence but to borrow the  lyrics from my old friend Leonard, "I fought against the bottle but I had to do it drunk."

But that's no reason for a reprobate like you to be discourteous. 


As Uncle Bitters has gone to such lengths to besmirch us all I should clarify my preference.

My choice would normally lean towards bubbles and the office cooler is pictured.

My preferred Veuve declined to associate with plastic and left it the tawdry Coldstream Chandon mob to provide.

I'll slum it with Billy or Bollie if one must...and sometimes one....must.

Bit warm for a red.

Excuse me...have to pack for Jolly ol Port D 

Cheers big ears 

 

1443724232-moet-water-cooler.jpg

58 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

As Uncle Bitters has gone to such lengths to besmirch us all I should clarify my preference.

My choice would normally lean towards bubbles and the office cooler is pictured.

My preferred Veuve declined to associate with plastic and left it the tawdry Coldstream Chandon mob to provide.

I'll slum it with Billy or Bollie if one must...and sometimes one....must.

Bit warm for a red.

Excuse me...have to pack for Jolly ol Port D 

Cheers big ears 

 

1443724232-moet-water-cooler.jpg

A man of impeccable taste. 

 

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

As Uncle Bitters has gone to such lengths to besmirch us all I should clarify my preference.

My choice would normally lean towards bubbles and the office cooler is pictured.

My preferred Veuve declined to associate with plastic and left it the tawdry Coldstream Chandon mob to provide.

I'll slum it with Billy or Bollie if one must...and sometimes one....must.

Bit warm for a red.

Excuse me...have to pack for Jolly ol Port D 

Cheers big ears 

 

1443724232-moet-water-cooler.jpg

never seen a urinal like that.........but i like it

14 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

never seen a urinal like that.........but i like it

I think you're just taking the proverbial ^_^

1 hour ago, hemingway said:

A man of impeccable taste. 

 

Funny you say that Ernest.... my new Togs arrived today. Should be just the thing for imminent trip north ;)

IMG_20171120_151800.jpg


15 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Funny you say that Ernest.... my new Togs arrived today. Should be just the thing for imminent trip north ;)

IMG_20171120_151800.jpg

Now BB, using the term "togs" is like carbon dating.

Although not an archaeological dig, the picture tells the story.

You are clearly a baby boomer who enjoys the beach in his togs. 

The phallic cactus design, however, suggests some retro togs recently bought. It also suggests a "middle aged man" making a last ditch attempt to establish .....err lets say tasteful masculinity. 

I am afraid that my togs are an old pair of rather thin speedos that do nothing for my shape and for some reason seems to draw looks of disgust or laughter from the fairer sex. I also seem to attract much attention from the men, particularly the male twosomes, who or some reason seem to approve the look, obviously preferring the retro speedos to the boardies.  

Id be disowned Ernest should i ever wear a pair of 'budgies' 

Tbh.  Id disown myself !!!

In deference to impending trip north...and likelihood of spending much time in pool and with the departure of 'that bloke' :rolleyes: i thought id buy some of his Boardies ...hoping they'd fit !!

If they don't fit I'm cactus...if they do fit I'm...cactus....with a bar near a pool....am bound to be........??

They fit.... I'll still be cactus ???

At least wifey can innocuously ask around... "anyone seen my cactus hubby ?"

In other news, I saw that Jake Lever was in Romsey this week, Uncle Bitter. 

 You didn’t take him down to the manor for a few sneaky glasses of rough red and a jolly good flogging?  Just so long as he stayed away from your Wolf Creek style dungeon.

 
  • Author
1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

Id be disowned Ernest should i ever wear a pair of 'budgies' 

Tbh.  Id disown myself !!!

In deference to impending trip north...and likelihood of spending much time in pool and with the departure of 'that bloke' :rolleyes: i thought id buy some of his Boardies ...hoping they'd fit !!

If they don't fit I'm cactus...if they do fit I'm...cactus....with a bar near a pool....am bound to be........??

They fit.... I'll still be cactus ???

At least wifey can innocuously ask around... "anyone seen my cactus hubby ?"

Wouldn't call her "wifey". That is the name of a famous porn star and her site. Will admit though she is a beautiful woman.

44 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Wouldn't call her "wifey". That is the name of a famous porn star and her site. Will admit though she is a beautiful woman.

Wondered myself whether BB was referring to the dearly beloved or a pseudonym.

I assumed given BB's credentials that it was the former. 

Lets face it, it is unlikely that one would be wearing "togs" if catching the sun with the pseudonym.  

Now if it was the good old Uncle, we would be assuming the opposite. 

I must admit, I am also surprised by your admission Redleg that you are acquainted with Wifey.

Perhaps from your perusal of the evidence against a client. Or just research.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 528 replies