Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
53 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

It gets worse, red: I’m attending a Big Bash match tonight. 

OMG

 
  • Author
57 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I spent 20+ years masquerading as a Carlton supporter. Does that count?

I am actually scared for you over BBO's possible reply to this shocking news.

Edited by Redleg

11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I am actually scared for you over BBO's possible reply to this shocking news.

I’m sure BBO has waaaaaaay worse skeletons in his creepy old closet. 
*shudder*

 
1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Au contraire 640! It shows an undying devotion to the mighty Dees. Do you realise how hard it is to silently barrack for our beloved Dees whilst wearing your Bruce 11 Doull duffel coat?!?!

Carlton has been my second team for a long time. Started in the 70's when I lived in their country zone. Dees were [censored] and they were winning flags. 

2 hours ago, old dee said:

Carlton has been my second team for a long time. Started in the 70's when I lived in their country zone. Dees were [censored] and they were winning flags. 

That makes two of us! On the entire planet, that is. 
#SmallestMinorityEverInTheHistoryOfMankind


As a kid, Carlton was my second team mainly because I was confused.  When we sing "keep an eye on the red and the blue" in our song, I thought Carlton was the blue 😂

12 minutes ago, DeelightfulPlay said:

As a kid, Carlton was my second team mainly because I was confused.  When we sing "keep an eye on the red and the blue" in our song, I thought Carlton was the blue 😂

You never noticed the blue on our players? As in, predominantly blue?

Suspicious Meme GIF by MOODMAN

 
17 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

You never noticed the blue on our players? As in, predominantly blue?

Suspicious Meme GIF by MOODMAN

thought he meant "keep an eye on the red (swans)and the blue (carlton)"  🤣

  • Author

Having any liking for Carlscum at all, is simply unacceptable, on any level.

Shame, shame, shame!


21 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I’m sure BBO has waaaaaaay worse skeletons in his creepy old closet. 
*shudder*

My closet only holds my extensive colletion of designer kaftans and some other bespoke items for those  'special' moments.

 

14 hours ago, Redleg said:

Having any liking for Carlscum at all, is simply unacceptable, on any level.

Shame, shame, shame!

Agree entirely with your Solomon like wisdom Red. 

I move that WCW be banned from this thread for an audible obscenity.

18 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That makes two of us! On the entire planet, that is. 
#SmallestMinorityEverInTheHistoryOfMankind

I think the number is way bigger than 2 WCW. A lot just do not admit divided loyalties of bygone times.   

Edited by old dee

14 hours ago, DeelightfulPlay said:

Maybe one player off from a full 23 as a kid!

Only one?  I see half the side M.I.A. 

53 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

My closet only holds my extensive colletion of designer kaftans and some other bespoke items for those  'special' moments.

Your closet must be the biggest room in the manor. 7XL kaftans ain’t fitting into a regular closet.

And as for your ‘other bespoke items’ where I come from we call them crocs. 


  • Author
1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

 

Agree entirely with your Solomon like wisdom Red. 

I move that WCW be banned from this thread for an audible obscenity.

BBO, the thread tribunal ( me ) has sat on this issue and now hands down its decision on WCW’s transgression.

After being extended great leniency, after her earlier misdemeanour , this latest one of admitting to liking Carlscum, has to incur a penalty.

WCW is hereby banned from this thread for 1 hour. The Tribunal understands this will hurt, but standards must be kept up by the users of the thread, for the benefit of all.

The penalty is now in force.

Let this be a lesson to all.

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Agree entirely with your Solomon like wisdom Red. 

I move that WCW be banned from this thread for an audible obscenity.

🙋‍♀️ I second the motion. 

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

BBO, the thread tribunal ( me ) has sat on this issue and now hands down its decision on WCW’s transgression.

After being extended great leniency, after her earlier misdemeanour , this latest one of admitting to liking Carlscum, has to incur a penalty.

WCW is hereby banned from this thread for 1 hour. The Tribunal understands this will hurt, but standards must be kept up by the users of the thread, for the benefit of all.

The penalty is now in force.

Let this be a lesson to all.

What must one do to incur a ban of a decent length?!?!

  • Author
8 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

What must one do to incur a ban of a decent length?!?!

Repeat an offence or steal BBO’s kaftan.

10 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Repeat an offence or steal BBO’s kaftan.

I’ll go with the first of those options. The second one is out of the question for many, many reasons, the main one being I don’t have a removalist truck. Do you even know how heavy 7XL kaftans are?!?!


  • Author
3 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I’ll go with the first of those options. The second one is out of the question for many, many reasons, the main one being I don’t have a removalist truck. Do you even know how heavy 7XL kaftans are?!?!

I believe 7XL kaftans  are 3 Demis Roussos’ at his heaviest.

BTW the Tribunal hasn’t forgotten, your ban starts at midday.

Edited by Redleg

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

I believe 7XL kaftans  are 3 Demis Roussos’ at his heaviest.

BTW the Tribunal hasn’t forgotten, your ban starts at midday.

That gives me a solid 20 minutes to attract a lengthier ban. For starters, how’s this… I used to fantasise about Tom Scully (in case you missed it, that’s THOMAS SCULLY) playing for the Blues and absolutely killing it, even winning the Brownlow and a premiership or two with them. 

  • Author
28 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That gives me a solid 20 minutes to attract a lengthier ban. For starters, how’s this… I used to fantasise about Tom Scully (in case you missed it, that’s THOMAS SCULLY) playing for the Blues and absolutely killing it, even winning the Brownlow and a premiership or two with them. 

Well that’s just downright nasty.

You got your wish you are banned for 24 hours.

 
1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Well that’s just downright nasty.

You got your wish you are banned for 24 hours.

So much effort for only 24 hours banned?! I give up. I concede defeat. I’ll just have to learn to embrace my bizarre fascination with this thread, and the clinically insane who regularly post here. 
🙄

  • Author
55 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I’ll just have to learn to embrace my bizarre fascination with this thread, and the clinically insane who regularly post here. 
🙄

It’s too late for flattery.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 198 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

    • 31 replies