Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

 
  • Author
16 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

Disgraceful by WJ, in trying to trick innocent folk into uttering a banned name.

 

 
  • Author
28 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Ok … fill in the blank

________ and Trengove are two names that have appeared on the playing list of Port Adelaide.

I was thinking Adelaide when I said Fogarty.

But to more important matters, you have breached our standards twice in one day and you are hereby banned from this thread for 32 minutes.


  • Author
51 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

… and the answer is “Boak”.

You have breached your ban. Add another 9 minutes.

Edited by Redleg

23 hours ago, daisycutter said:

what;s happened to the lads, uncle, you haven't mentioned them for ages?

did they all succumb to covid?

or have you eaten them all?

concerned dc

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

  • Author
10 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

That is sad news.  Maybe a trip to the forest is in order, to find a couple of possums to have as new pets.

I know the manor isn’t air conditioned, so hopefully the maid has a big fan to keep you cool on this very hot day

.

 
18 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

Tom Scully the 2nd

  • Author
13 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Tom Scully the 2nd

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.


2 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

21 minutes ago, old dee said:

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

OD did you really mean an illuminating sentence?

Edited by ManDee
Bit of lite humour!

4 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

  • Author
1 hour ago, demosaw said:

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

On 12/27/2022 at 4:13 PM, Redleg said:

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

Must be the Christmas spirit from you Mr Leg. I think you are weakening in your advancing years. 


On 12/27/2022 at 9:53 AM, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

  • Author
52 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

Have a safe and  happy New Year and please don’t mention that name again, as over 1115 pages of 1.2m views and thousands of posters have managed to refrain from doing.

Now back to my spearmint and camomile tea.

Edited by Redleg

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

  • Author
1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

It gets better after interval.

4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

I’m going with seriously deranged.


red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

  • Author
21 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

33 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

 
  • Author
39 minutes ago, old dee said:

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

Yes indeed OD.

22 hours ago, Redleg said:

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 210 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Like
    • 253 replies