Jump to content

The No T$ No B$ Thread

Redleg
Redleg
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

  • Quote
    •  
    • Author
    16 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

    hwfua's namesake

    and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

    Disgraceful by WJ, in trying to trick innocent folk into uttering a banned name.

     

  • Quote
    •  
    • Author
    28 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

    Ok … fill in the blank

    ________ and Trengove are two names that have appeared on the playing list of Port Adelaide.

    I was thinking Adelaide when I said Fogarty.

    But to more important matters, you have breached our standards twice in one day and you are hereby banned from this thread for 32 minutes.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    • Author
    51 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

    … and the answer is “Boak”.

    You have breached your ban. Add another 9 minutes.

    Edited by Redleg

  • Quote
    23 hours ago, daisycutter said:

    what;s happened to the lads, uncle, you haven't mentioned them for ages?

    did they all succumb to covid?

    or have you eaten them all?

    concerned dc

    Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

    They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

  • Quote
    • Sad 1
    • Author
    10 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

    Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

    They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

    That is sad news.  Maybe a trip to the forest is in order, to find a couple of possums to have as new pets.

    I know the manor isn’t air conditioned, so hopefully the maid has a big fan to keep you cool on this very hot day

    .

  • Quote
    •  
    18 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

    Today’s quiz.

    Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

    Tom Scully the 2nd

  • Quote
    • Author
    13 minutes ago, demosaw said:

    Tom Scully the 2nd

    You are banned for a month.

    Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

    Have a look at the thread title.

    If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

    Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

    Who knows, who cares.

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1

    2 hours ago, Redleg said:

    You are banned for a month.

    Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

    Have a look at the thread title.

    If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

    Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

    Who knows, who cares.

    I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

  • Quote
    21 minutes ago, old dee said:

    I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

    OD did you really mean an illuminating sentence?

    Edited by ManDee
    Bit of lite humour!

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, Redleg said:

    You are banned for a month.

    Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

    Have a look at the thread title.

    If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

    Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

    Who knows, who cares.

    Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

  • Quote
    • Author
    1 hour ago, demosaw said:

    Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

    You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    On 12/27/2022 at 4:13 PM, Redleg said:

    You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

    Must be the Christmas spirit from you Mr Leg. I think you are weakening in your advancing years. 

  • Quote

    On 12/27/2022 at 9:53 AM, Redleg said:

    You are banned for a month.

    Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

    Have a look at the thread title.

    If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

    Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

    Who knows, who cares.

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY 

     

    THOMAS

    BLOODY

    SCULLY

    Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

    I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

    Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

    I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

  • Quote
    • Author
    52 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY 

     

    THOMAS

    BLOODY

    SCULLY

    Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

    I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

    Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

    I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

    I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

    You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

    I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

    Have a safe and  happy New Year and please don’t mention that name again, as over 1115 pages of 1.2m views and thousands of posters have managed to refrain from doing.

    Now back to my spearmint and camomile tea.

    Edited by Redleg

  • Quote
    • Haha 2

    Interest Reaction GIF

    Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

  • Quote
    • Author
    1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

    Interest Reaction GIF

    Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

    It gets better after interval.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY

    TOM SCULLY 

     

    THOMAS

    BLOODY

    SCULLY

    Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

    I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

    Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

    I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

    Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

    I’m going with seriously deranged.

  • Quote

    red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

    it's going to the dogs 🥵

  • Quote
    • Author
    21 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

    red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

    it's going to the dogs 🥵

    I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

    Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

    It is a thankless task managing all of you.

  • Quote
    33 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

    Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

    It is a thankless task managing all of you.

    I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

    A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    • Author
    39 minutes ago, old dee said:

    I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

    A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

    Yes indeed OD.

  • Quote
    22 hours ago, Redleg said:

    I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

    You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

    I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

    IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

    Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
    Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREGAME: Fremantle

      The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Love
      • 18 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Essendon

      Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • 14 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Essendon

      Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

        • Haha
      • 165 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • GAMEDAY: Essendon

      It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

        • Like
      • 723 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 489 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All