Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

 
  • Author
16 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

hwfua's namesake

and shame on you for raising it on this sanctuary 

Disgraceful by WJ, in trying to trick innocent folk into uttering a banned name.

 

 
  • Author
28 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Ok … fill in the blank

________ and Trengove are two names that have appeared on the playing list of Port Adelaide.

I was thinking Adelaide when I said Fogarty.

But to more important matters, you have breached our standards twice in one day and you are hereby banned from this thread for 32 minutes.


  • Author
51 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

… and the answer is “Boak”.

You have breached your ban. Add another 9 minutes.

Edited by Redleg

23 hours ago, daisycutter said:

what;s happened to the lads, uncle, you haven't mentioned them for ages?

did they all succumb to covid?

or have you eaten them all?

concerned dc

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

  • Author
10 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Yes sadly dc , the lads have departed this mortal coil.

They are now chasing their allotted 70 virgins in the alpaca afterlife .

That is sad news.  Maybe a trip to the forest is in order, to find a couple of possums to have as new pets.

I know the manor isn’t air conditioned, so hopefully the maid has a big fan to keep you cool on this very hot day

.

 
18 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Today’s quiz.

Who wears the number 32 for Port Adelaide?

Tom Scully the 2nd

  • Author
13 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Tom Scully the 2nd

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.


2 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

21 minutes ago, old dee said:

I think that is a light sentence your honour. I might have to appeal to a higher authority. 

OD did you really mean an illuminating sentence?

Edited by ManDee
Bit of lite humour!

4 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

  • Author
1 hour ago, demosaw said:

Leg I didn’t mention T$$ S$$$$$ just his namesake but your thread your rules so happy to take my punishment.

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

On 12/27/2022 at 4:13 PM, Redleg said:

You are correct and I have judged your appeal and suspended your sentence.

Must be the Christmas spirit from you Mr Leg. I think you are weakening in your advancing years. 


On 12/27/2022 at 9:53 AM, Redleg said:

You are banned for a month.

Do you know that name is banned from this thread?

Have a look at the thread title.

If I was a suspicious person, , I would think you are close to the poster who posted the question, or indeed one and the same.

Perhaps you don't even exist and are just an alias.

Who knows, who cares.

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

  • Author
52 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

Have a safe and  happy New Year and please don’t mention that name again, as over 1115 pages of 1.2m views and thousands of posters have managed to refrain from doing.

Now back to my spearmint and camomile tea.

Edited by Redleg

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

  • Author
1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Interest Reaction GIF

Sheer entertainment, friendly, fun and free!

It gets better after interval.

4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

I’m going with seriously deranged.


red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

  • Author
21 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

red, you'd better pull your socks up and manage this thread properly before it's too late

it's going to the dogs 🥵

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

33 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I blame Demon 🐸 Frog.

Haven’t seen any of his pictures lately.

It is a thankless task managing all of you.

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

 
  • Author
39 minutes ago, old dee said:

I knew this would happen as soon as you let demosaw off the hook. Tough decisions need to be taken against these infidels.

A big of concrete is needed Mr. Leg.

Yes indeed OD.

22 hours ago, Redleg said:

I have booked you in with a reputed Psychologist as your behaviour is quite worrying and hurtful to so many on here.

You are clearly being affected by Uncle Bitters playing hard to get.

I have also advised all the other thread posters to go easy on you and given what I perceive to be a difficult time for you, out of the goodness of my heart, I have decided that on this occasion, you won’t be banned.

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 206 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies