While I don't think that he's necessarily a dirty player (though Godders might have a different interpretation) if Robert Murphy get's one week for his innocuous effort, then this is surely a suspendable action. Selwood was left dazed and in the hands of the trainers, the AFL have been extremely soft on this decision.

I agree grazman, that deserved 2 weeks. He wasn't looking at the ball, this is the exact situation the AFL wants to get rid of.

While I don't think that he's necessarily a dirty player (though Godders might have a different interpretation) if Robert Murphy get's one week for his innocuous effort, then this is surely a suspendable action. Selwood was left dazed and in the hands of the trainers, the AFL have been extremely soft on this decision.

He's a Swan........and they are a protected species.

Nuf said.

certain incident with moloney and bartel comes to mind.... also apparently goodes has no good of bad record so he can get 25% discount.... .goodes should rot in hell

He's a swan and for other 'reasons' - he is VERY protected.

The AFL would love to have an indiginous Brownlow medallist, rather than an imported Irish Brownlow Medallist, as the consecutive games record holder.

That's my opinion, and from the other charges he's got off, I reckon I'm right.

Moose

He's a Swan........and they are a protected species.

Nuf said.

Like Barry Hall? I agree with you though. Living in Canberra I get very sick of the blatant fawning over this club. Yes there on field exploits are worthy of praise, but they get gifted a dream run by the AFL that infuriates me.

There is an AFL love affair with Goodes. He could probably knock somebody out with a fend off and not even give away a free kick.

Absolutely ridiculous decision.

He is the most protected player I can remember - he gets away with cheap ones during games and dirty ones at the tribunal. Crazy.

It will be a joke if he doesn't get suspended.

It will be a joke if he doesn't get suspended.

Has now had the benefit four times that I can recall and at least two this year. Moloney was suspended for missing Bartel but being reckless in that he could have hit him. Never heard that one before, go figure.

i think he;s a cheap player and i cant believe he's been offered a reprimand for an early guilty plea. what a fkn crock of [censored]. seriously? if that was moloney or miller they'd get 6...

It was fairly similar to the Beau Waters one, except Waters actually looked like he might've gotten the ball

Disgrace! And how does he not at least have points carrying over?!?! Joke

Ill never forget how he got angry at tight tagging from Godfrey and charged into his back while the ball was not in play, 20 meters away.

Clearly hurt Godfrey and the incident barely got looked at.

He is a champion player though.

Nope correct decision (he is in my dream team......)

yeah i dont want goodes going near stynes consec games record , how he got off for hitiing gooders was discrace, and this week he wasnt looking where he was going and hit selwood , think he has 93 points carried over