Jump to content

Diamond_Jim

Life Member
  • Posts

    13,443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Diamond_Jim

  1. $20 per member would give us the same financial result without the risk of the downside
  2. Actually what is interesting here is Adelaide's view on the match. I assume they are a willing participant and are being paid by the NT government to show up. Slightly surprising as they are a very wealthy club and don't need the angst of playing in tropical conditions in a tight year. On a radio interview Peter Gordon said he would want $1M for the Dogs to participate in China (over and above expenses) so that is the value he put on the home game. The other question is what crowd would we have got in Melbourne and how much would we have made.
  3. As I have posted many times the Darwin saga is terrible from so many angles. If we must include the NT let's do two games in Alice Springs where the winter conditions are suitable for football at an AFL standard.
  4. I think you are spot on Old dee. Plapp's assessment of Kennedy leaves no one in doubt about his selection chances for this week ...nil JKH probably increased his slim chance of selection by being the emergency and not playing
  5. Yep it's a bye for Casey. It was probably planned by the club to allow the Casey AFL members to participate in clinics etc which I suspect is part of the deal to get the thirty pieces of silver the NT government pay us. #DitchDarwin
  6. if we win 12 games the odds are there will be five teams on 12 games with us and percentage may or may not put us in. We really need 13 wins to ensure a position in the eight
  7. To make top 4 we have to win 15/16 games which means we probably need to win 6/7 of our remaining 7 games. To make it with less would require Port, Richmond and Saints to all have a lesser run and then there is Sydney .. one game behind us with a better percentage. I just cannot see it happening
  8. Just did some playing with the ladder predictor. (Great fun) Applied relatively unemotional logic and I found it hard to see us finish above 5th. GWS could easily slip below Geelong was an interesting outcome. The big games for us are those against the Saints and Port. I assumed losses against the Giants and Adelaide. Lose to the Saints and we are seventh. Lose to Port as well and we are in a log jam with 4 other teams on 12 wins for the last two spots in the eight. Joy o Joy but I have Richmond at ninth on percentage Boy this season is close
  9. For those pushing for Kennedy over Kent I would be interested in why. To some extent I could understand JKH but in reality they are three players at the same level. If anything Kent is ranked a little higher based on some of his performances last year. Kent is now feeling the pace of senior football and should get another game. If JKH or Kennedy were demonstrably better or offered something else I could understand but they are all thereabouts. Interesting that many of those pushing for Kent to be dropped are not saying the same about Smith who on any score did very little. Trenners is no longer an option I am afraid.
  10. I always feel that this thread is where the "big boys" come to play in the sense that it is favoured by many astute followers of the game. When I go to the game ... other than the mistakes and the forward marks I am lucky to notice three or four other players to the extent that I can comment on them. Well done Joe Boy and keep em coming PS I think almost everyone got a "well done" from Joe Boy against the Dogs or was that West Coast .. so he is human after all PPS Long may Tyson reign !!!
  11. that could be a real plan ... he would need to increase the tank and improve his ground ball game but I don't mind the thinking. If only then the Weed could become the big marking forward with Tom "swinging" and Watts at half forward we could have a premiership winning set up.
  12. MFCSS tells me this is not going to end well. Amazing the culture we have today. If I was the supporter I would be apologising quietly through the club and in turn Oliver would apologise. Both parties would move on ...lesson learnt To allow contact through the media is madness not to mention bringing my employer into it. Some employers I know would sack you for mentioning it in a non-employment context.
  13. Good win and much needed but it was disappointing that twice in the second half we had leads of around 10 points and let them back in to the extent that they took the lead. I'll take it but we will need to move to another level to be any chance over the next few weeks. The good thing is that so many players had an average game but yesterday we just could not get that fast moving game going that delivers the 6 goal plus quarters. Accept we had players out but we still need to take a step up over the next few weeks. On Kent .. he had two clear goaling opportunities which had he taken perhaps we would be speaking differently. At least he was in the right spot as others have said. Changing him for JKH or Kennedy is not a step up.
  14. Casey have a bye this week coming so not much use to us for playing some of those who may need a run. If Watts does not play what do some think of the Weed in place of Pederson. My thinking is that he could be an X factor in a game that whatever one says will be hard to win. He has also shown at Casey that he can go into the ruck which may serve to get him into the game. Something which he was unable to do at AFL level in the last few games of his recent stint.
  15. Unfortunately you could be right also Hammies don't do well with 3-4 hour flights so they may not risk him. Pity because we need everyone we got to face down Adelaide
  16. think you could be right .... there is obviously something Goody sees in Smith that we have yet to find. Noticed him in a one on one marking comp where his job was to spoil and it wasn't pretty
  17. Will be good to see Gawn hit form again. His match today was not anywhere near his usual high standard. He took a pack mark in the third quarter which reminded me of his good days. Our midfield seemed to get on top in the second quarter at least at centre clearances but we had difficulty finding forward targets. Looking forward to the replay so I can understand some of those umpiring decisions in the last quarter. Starnge to say the least.
  18. Well .. here we are with a win .... perhaps not as easily as some of us might have wished but it was a win. Well now it's Adelaide at my favourite ground... followed by Port at the MCG and North at the iceberg also known as Blundstone Arena. An unholy trinity of games if ever there was one but not impossible as we move closer to the business end of the season. Win two ... or dare we dream... three and top four seriously beckons St Kilda play the Toiges again which gives us a bump in that regard. As well as us Port play the Saints and Adelaide together with a tricky game against the Doggies at Docklands. The bottom half of the eight is well within our grasp but no reason we can't strive for top 4 as our injured players return. Go Dees and PS.... would prefer the games to be a little easier than today's against Carlton !
  19. Now behind.... unbelievable
  20. Doing our best to let them back into it. Now they hit the front
  21. On top now... time to put It on the scoreboard
  22. Some glimpses of good play in that last 10 minutes but not stringing it together. Hoping for a big second half
  23. We just cannot get out of first gear. Where's that attacking style we used to play
  24. Can we play worse. Probably not which is a positive
  25. We have little forward structure and are way too loose when they counter attack. Not much use all our forwards playing around the wing
×
×
  • Create New...