Jump to content

old dee

Annual Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by old dee

  1. old dee replied to Lord Nev's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The silence is deafening Wells. MFC site tells us nothing. Perhaps all the news is being held over till Thursday night.
  2. old dee replied to Lord Nev's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    With the expected development of Goschs it is probably going to be our home for the next couple of years. Why would our captain move to a house down that way? Perhaps he knows things we don't!
  3. Agree PSD, He had to guide us through some very difficult times with a team that was struggling to be VFL standard. In my view he has assembled a fairly good list. On the down side he was one of a team that got Goodwin in when Roos did not initially like the idea. There is a story there for another time. All those who selected Goodwin have now left the building. Hmm
  4. Well after we fell in a hole.
  5. Nothing on the MFC site Bda. Well that was yesterday perhaps it is intentional due to virus restrictions.
  6. The web site has very little on anything LH, no info on training times, player injuries, nothing but a few fluff pieces. This is in my IMO the result of reduced staff levels. 2021 will see us with less info than normal from the site. We will have to work around it for info.
  7. We will be training at Casey in 2021 because building will start soon at Goschs!!!!
  8. Could not agree more BBP. But I have zero confidence he will get the job done.
  9. old dee replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Why change their default position dc?
  10. Probably better to have player models from the knees up.
  11. I don't really care what they wear
  12. I went on the MFC site this morning and could see nothing about training what so ever. Lack of staff in 2020 is probably the cause. I think we are just going to have to survive with leads info this summer.
  13. There must be 18 houses in danger over the next month.
  14. No but they are training the house down. Sorry could not help myself.
  15. Yes some days you would think we were on the Tigers site arguing the Dees point of view. The electronic world of the 21st century has some great benefits but the social media area is the haven of ever nut case and there even nutter theories.
  16. Stop being logical LDC. For god sake man can’t you see the conspiracy here?
  17. Could not agree more NC. It is the vicinity of the G and that is it. I have been trying to tell people on here for months. I don’t care where it is as long as it gets us the facilities that match most other clubs. The MFC board and 90% of members want it close to the G. End of story.
  18. Not sure your third choice exists DJ. That is the problem. It is Casey or Goschs.
  19. Not sure Kent. I have a feeling it is all waiting on rezoning the area use.
  20. old dee replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Some days I am more positive than others DC.
  21. old dee replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If it was us and the dogs in this deal the AFL would have stepped in long ago. But it’s the pies, one of the untouchable clubs with too many supporters to upset. Come on Gil a little spine please.
  22. Forget about Port we are never going there Kent. As you know it is G vicinity or never.
  23. I don’t have an objection Bda but the board and the vast majority of members want it close to the G.Nothing else will get a look in.
  24. I have driving all over Melbourne in my jobs for the 45 years I suggest you should make the drive. But I am not sure why we are going on with this this as the MFC have said on numerous occasions that facility has to be in the vicinity of the G. Port Melb. Is not in the vicinity of the G no matter how you look at it. End of story.
  25. But what's just around the corner?