Dr. Gonzo

Have they thought about how this would work if one team is impacted twice (or more)??

And then a 4 day turnaround for our game against the Cats?

He is unable to put his bias aside when talking about Essendon he might as well be wearing his Terry daniher duffel coat What is more of a disgrace is Whately not pulling him up on it

As Riewoldt said on the couch the slight benefit you might get from the synergy of line groups playing together is completely offset by the massive risk if one of them is wiped out for 2 games. It really is idiotic to have all forwards, mids and backs training together in the current environment

Imagine our midfield group had to miss two weeks because one of them tested positive. 186 would be in danger of being broken.

Carlton and Collingwood are likely going to benefit while we are disadvantaged.

No public comment perpetuates the stereotype that we are a soft touch, a club that just gets pushed around by other clubs and the AFL. We have been severely disadvantages through no fault of our own, I would be wanting answers from the AFL as to how they propose to mitigate this and put it out for the public so they are held accountable for it

God no

Was it May? I thought it was lever but found it hard to tell.

Melksham and VDB need to be our links across half forward. They are both marking targets that help with the "connection" between midfield and forwardline and we missed them both last year.

But then we'd still be playing OMac and/or Frost so it's understandable why they did it. Not the right move long term but they obviously thought we were close to a flag after finishing top 4. We got Jackson the year after though so hopefully it all works out.... King looks like a star though (the gold coast one) Throw the chequebook at Cameron. I don't know who else is available but we need someone.

Yes

TMac and Weid MIA

Where is the leadership of the club on this? It's all well and good for Max to give a couple of words after the scratch match but I think it's time we started hearing from Bartlett/Pert more than once every 3 months.

It's like carpet out there. Surely we could train on it one day a week with one session at Casey and our lighter session at Gosch's.

I'm generally pretty optimistic I think, or at least willing to give the team time to prove themselves before writing them off. But if TMac doesnt find some form soon we are rooted. You can talk about gameplans and plan B's all you want but if you don't have a key forward you're going nowhere.

1916 Fitzroy won the spoon and the flag in a 4 team competition.

Bartel wasn't it?

Their blatant bias in decision making makes them seem like such a provincial backwater league. Absolute Farce League.

Play him out of the goal square this week with Fritsch and Melksham pushing up to half forward and Kozzie and Hunt buzzing around his feet and Hannan as a second target. If he can't hit the scoreboard or create opportunities for the other guys I'd be considering giving him a stint on the sidelines.

It's not just Jackson - if TMac doesn't perform this week he will be well and truly in the gun too.

Gifting games to kids sets a terrible culture and is exactly the kind of thing we have said we are moving away from over the last 6 or 7 years.

Disappointed he isn't getting a game. He needs to step up this year but pretty hard to do that watching on the sidelines. It's not like we have an abundance of key fwds, put him in and let him show it. If not he'll be gone but I'd rather he was given the chance first. In also worried about chucking Jackson in too early. It's not like he's out there with a seasoned veteran who can help him hone his craft, TMac has no idea.

They should be able to wear the prison bars for all home games. Eddie is just a sook, they won't be calling themselves the Magpies - the contract they signed 25 years ago can be reviewed enough time has past now. You would think with Collingwood in the position they are now compared to the mid-90s they wouldn't be so insecure about this kind of stuff anymore

Elliot? Bond at Richmond? McAlister (probably 90s)? but yeah point taken