jnrmac

I think it happens often that the prime suspect has a perfunctory interview and when all of the other evidence is gathered they go back to the PS armed with a lot more information and detailed questions. At least that's what watching years of CSI tells me ha ha That they haven't yet spoken to him (or maybe it just hasn't been publicly stated) is mystifying.

very interesting Having not won in round 1 OR 2 since 2005 its hard to get excited.

Its Jack Watts' fault

Did OK for Gary Ablett. Was just a player before the brought in LT. Has done OK since...

yawn.... we were 16th to 18th in nearly every stat Need to improve everywhere.

Its all Jack Watts' fault.

Well for a start every contest is not contested. You need to be able to hurt teams on turnovers, quick delivery and keeping possession of the ball.

Everyone has a role. Not everyone wins a lot of contested ball. Nor do you want them to. We need players who can deliver accurately to our fwds. Haven't had that in a long time.

Sorry if it has been mentioned already but no Magner in todays rookie draft....

You can't pat yourself on the back so I;ll do it for you. Well done!

Or Simon Buckley

Apologies for starting this thread. Time to commit hari kari

Some BIG issues on Land these days.... FMD When does the footy start?

Exactly what I thought! I think his initials were T$ What was interesting to me is that it didn't have the glowing, drooling description of Kelly that the mock draft descriptions had and that morons like Barrett said would come back to bite Melbourne. Time will tell but here are two descriptions given by someone who watches them both week in week out and while both are good I reckon the Salem description is a lot more favourable and glowing.

Interesting to read profiles of both Salem and Kelly. Both reviews come from the Zebras and hence would be considered 'favourable' to their own players but on reading both and knowing nothing else about them you would take Salem every time. Interesting.

Because his last three years were so good????

Ok enough already. I started this thread as a joke. Time to shut down mods.....

This.

I don't think thats factual at all. I don't think they needed Buddy. They wanted him because he is the most marketable character in the games who is also a very good player. To say that they have to 'replace' Buddy with another tall is nonsense.

Like

..ha ha just kidding,,,, I figured someone would start this sometime soon.

If only we get a good pre-season...

No its not. Read the notes when he was drafted. Thats what they drafted him on. We are yet to see it.....

Yep

What the Herald Sun? Hardly a whisper when its sent to 680000 people