jnrmac

Let me know when he does his usual out on the full...

Thats why he should be traded.

Tyson snap goal....

2nd poster

We could possibly get Malceski and O'Keefe for very little....

Thx Smthy I was kind of referring to the smashing teams bit rather than the skinny win. The Swans win was one of the few I remember like that.

It did with Sylvia. We have won twice as many....

I thought the same thing myself. Its never us... And we always seem to play teams back into form. Will never forget in 92 or 93 when the swans had lost 23 in a row and smashed us on their 'one chance to play at the MCG' We are a mentally weak club and have been for a long time. Talking top ex players they all say the same thing. Get on top of us and we go to water basically. I have heard it so many times now it makes me sick. Even good sides like Freo succumb to it as they did yesterday but ours is such a long history of it its galling.

The stats are compelling. With 4 i/changes - you lose a player early you are 81% likely to lose the game. hence the 3subs and substitute

Pretty obvious really. Surprised that some still don't get it. Having said that I don't like the interchange system and blame it for a lot of modern day woes. Remove some of the rubbish rules that sped the game up for 10 years. Go back to two interchange players. That will sort out a few issues!

I want to know why Dank hasn't responded (as far as we know) to the show cause notice. And if not why hasn't his name been put on the register of banned officials?

did roosy say something on sen?

Yep

Posted Yesterday, 05:29 PM Ha thats great. The guy that says Roos wouldn't say anything different in public to what he would privately!! As if Roos would telegraph to the world what our trading and drafting strategy would be. Sheesh. Priceless.

I think I have just been busted wasting time at work on DLand because I was laughing so hard at some of the responses. Nice work

Not saying he will be. Saying that we should consider it. He's not up to it and has some trade currency. Not too many others have that. As for Roos having different views publicly and privately I would say yes he would with 100% certainty.

Aaah the old elite argument.....

Absolutely. Drag it out for two years and turn the list over. The players are fodder and stupid not to realise this.

Different public view. What would a D'land poster know..

I think you are wrong about Dunn. His B&F results aren't all bad. 2013 6th 2013 10th 2011 24th 2010 13th

McVeigh "Every player knew what we were taking ... if you didn't know, you must have been asleep in the meeting, which Kyle probably was. Gee I'm confused. They knew then they didn't know or they were duped. In any case it doesn't matter cos we are not guilt. We didn't take anything banned.

Who us saying that exactly? No-one. What I'm saying is that he gives us very little and his lack of ability to win a contest is a huge problem for our team. The fact he has skills merely means he is tradeable IMO. Can't say that about too many other NQRs.

There are a hundred variables. Its about what you can get. he may not like a player but cant get anything for him. If he's contracted he stays. I disagree with you! It certainly can be a mindset but Watts has never shown it. Look that can be OK with some players. Steven Stretch comes to mind. One of the first picked every week yet not physical. Interestingly i have seen plenty of times when our players won't kick it to Watts who has run 30m on a lead. Its as thought they are saying 'stuff you I'm not giving you an easy ball'. there is somethig wrong and I suspect the club knows what it is. For me I'd trade him.

There are a hundred variables. Its about what you can get. he may not like a player but cant get anything for him. If he's contracted he stays.

You are probably right with Bartel being a pass but I was thinking if you look at Garland's past 5 weeks he has been well below par.