jnrmac

Great trade. Tyson was a 1 trick pony and not a great one at that. Also didn't play this year and we got a potential gun that can play multiple positions. Win win.

I'm not sure that theory holds water, can you name one instance where that has happened?

I can finally go back to listening to Gerard on 3aw Stopped listening after Hooksey died because Der Wayne is such a plonker

Here is a really unusual suggestion for pick 10. Seems to have been overlooked. Why don't we just pick a [censored] gun player

@Ethan Tremblay The trade whisperer - Yesterday's man....

You had to edit that post? Did you spell blah wrong?

Goodwin is already on record as saying that they underestimated 6-6-6 and that they made the mistake of trying to add complexity and nuance to their gameplan rather than work on refining the basics. They're just two things he has addressed. There are others. So I don't buy the 'didn't have the cohesion' story. If they didn't have the cohesion it was in the coaching dept. A wholesale change in the way we structure the coaching and fitness dept isn't tinkering at the edges. It's a fundamental shift. Maybe they have acknowledged that internally and are trotting out the company line publicly. That's fine. You wouldn't expect them to come out and say 'we totally botched it and have got rid of all the muppets who couldn't coach'. What it does do is put a whole heap of pressure on the first 5-6 rounds next year. New coaching staff, new fitness staff, new Director of coaching. They need to get he cohesion of the coaching dept working pretty well or it will be carnage if we 0-5.

That's glib. And total BS. Coaches have plans when one down with injury, or a team kicks 5 in a row, or they are kicking with the wind, or its wet, or the opposition is taller etc etc. The issue as Goodwin knows is what to do when Plan A isn't working. Maybe thats why we were so cooked this year. Certainly fits with the 'Goodwin is stubborn' view - how long did it take for him to change when teams kept chipping the ball and switching against us.

2. Is a huge issue. OUr players were like deer in the headlights because they didn't know what to do with in ball in hand 1 will help 2 although when players are confident in hteir teammates about where the ball is going (like say Richmond) its amazing how fit they will look. When the ball goes whizzing back over your head its amazing how unfit you look. 3 is unbelievable.

I'm no Oscar fan but that is disgraceful.

#EpsteinDidn't KillHimself Prince Andrew might still be taking calls though....

Yep he's only donated $500m in the past 2 years in philanthropic causes you goose. What a non-contributor he is to this country.

Well the forward line will be fixed up if Stafford is coaching goal kicking .......... Holy cow.

Thats what Frawley did with the Toiges in 2001. Made the prelim, got done by the Lions, tweaked the recruiting (Blomfield, Paul Hudson..) and promptly never saw finals again until 2013.......... Let's hope there's none of that at the Dees.

Not sure this necessarily follows. Yes you need a basic level of fitness to execute but our problems stem from a confused game plan, no trust in our team mates to run and spread. This is part fitness but its also getting burned on the turnover and the ball sails back over your head and before too long players start playing for themselves not the team. This is why I believe our problems this year were way more than injuries. The game plan fell apart and they were like deer in the headlights with ball in hand. When that happens you invite pressure, the ball gets turned over more often and skills look very ordinary. Its a vicious circle. Richmond by way of example are happy run fwd of the ball and chance their arm. As a team they are comfortable and not under the same pressure we are. B grade players look like A graders in a team orientated game like that. If they stuff up they don't have the same fallout that we have becuause they have been to the top and trust that it works.

Langdon has always had endurance. Was elite at schoolboy cross country. Hunt might be able to develop it...

Papley is one of these guys that becomes a superstar because he's out of contract. He's an OK player but not one you'd sell the farm for. Or pay $900k and pick 9. That's insanity.

They can 'try' all they like. We are in the box seat and will do the deal that suits us. Remember we gave away a lot to get pick 8. Why would we do that if we didn't have a clear idea of what we wanted? And why would we give it away for nothing?

Sorry that's a pretty inane comment. People have opinions all the time about sports they haven't played. Doesn't make them invalid. There are over 700 accredited media in the AFL and I estimate probably around 70 have played the game. So what? Some are good commentators some are bad. Pro tip: If you don't like reading other peoples opinions don't go on to a football fan site.

We won 5 games. 3 by less than a kick. That is more than injuries but lull yourself to sleep that all will be OK.

He's a terrible defender. Turned it over something shocking. He is a forward half player full stop. Very hard match up on. Can kick. Natural forward.

6 of the 10 teams below us in talent beat us last year......

Oliver goes alright..

Sometimes they take time. In 2016 we were 18th on defending one on ones. The club knew they had to get better defenders hence the recruitment of Lever and May. This year we are adding runners who can play the wing and assist with our transitions. As for poor kicking, its not just technique. Its running to the right spots, kicking to space, getting the ball to someone who is under less pressure etc etc.

Pretty sure we picked up Toby Bedford last year from our 'academy'? Could be wrong tho...