Jump to content

mauriesy

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mauriesy

  1. Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
  2. I'm sure the team will try extra hard knowing that SWYL is "dissatisfied" and that more missives on the poor history of the club are coming our way on Demonland.
  3. So how are you not going to "accept" it? Make a thousand more boring and critical posts on Demonland? Endlessly bring up our terrible recent history? Appear continually dissatisfied? Try to depress those supporters who have some optimism? And a fat lot of good that will do for the actual team.
  4. Except the Brownlow came from the premiership team just last year.
  5. Who needs analysis when you can have Fawning Bruce?
  6. "if the Dockers are successful ... "
  7. It says a lot for our depth now that we can leave a player like Fritsch out. How's that first round pick for Lever looking? With free agency compensation and priority picks, we might be giving up pick 20.
  8. Clayton can take Angus as his partner and Melksham can take Tom.
  9. It used not to be. But at the moment we are moving the ball more quickly than any other team in the AFL.
  10. Oh no. I think he's gone.
  11. Just you think it's safe to come out, along comes a thread on Gary Rohan.
  12. Agree. We are hopefully past threads on Brendan Goddard, Billy Hartung, Nathan Freeman, Dan Hanneberry and Michael Barlow. But I'm waiting for the reincarnation of the Crameri thread. ?
  13. Calling Sir Why You Little.
  14. I don't suffer from the veil of negativity any more. Neeld and McLardy can ramble on all they like, even attempt to re-write history. I don't particularly care.
  15. I understand the idea of "development" and "potential", even for a KPB. Wait and see. He was only drafted in last year's rookie draft, and could easily have another 12 months before being upgraded. "Some guy on BigFooty" is hardly a reliable source.
  16. You don't reckon the most important thing for the Casey Demons in the finals now is winning, rather than being a half-a-game training opportunity for someone to get back to form and fitness? Not that Viney needs it either.
  17. mauriesy replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Eventually. I switched from my computer to a mobile phone, and it worked better. I'm not sure my satellite NBN wasn't stuffing up the system with the latency. M36, five rows from the fence, three bays around from the Geelong cheer squad. Looking forward to their quietness when we win. ?
  18. mauriesy replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I've been trying for 45 minutes. I just selected "best available" anywhere, for one ticket each under two memberships. It just constantly throws me to the message "There aren’t enough tickets to meet your request right now. Please try Best Available with a reduced quantity of tickets. If you receive this message even when selecting only one ticket, all remaining tickets are being transacted by other customers." Been timed out twice.
  19. mauriesy replied to Pates's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It helps to have some players who can speak lucidly, rationally and with knowledge of the game, to be a good front for the club. It's not the prime selection criteria for talent (Dustin Martin being the prime example), but it's not totally irrelevant. Imagine if the only thing every player on your team could do was grunt and answer in one syllable.
  20. mauriesy replied to Pates's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What's wrong with someone who speaks well and plays football well? Not like they're mutually exclusive.
  21. mauriesy replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Got through using the mobile version for a brief moment just before 1.00. Ticketek couldn't allocate two tickets in any section I chose, even up to $93.00. Now it tells me "member's tickets are no longer on sale". The website version just sits there going through 15 second cycles.
  22. What ... you don't trust the old one?
  23. The over-celebrating comment is just a way for media junkies like Judd, Hutchinson and Lloyd (who agreed) to look authoritative. We beat GWS and/or win the first final and they can say raising the issue made Melbourne re-focus. Lose to GWS and then drop out of finals in the first week and they can say they were vindicated. Either way they appear to "win".
  24. They do a survey then extrapolate out to the Australian population.
  25. When faced with a 50-50 decision, good umpires will either call a ball up or let the play go on. This is especially true of holding-the-ball decisions, where prior opportunity is a critical part of the decision. I don't think we "got away witha lot" at all.