Jump to content

whatwhat say what

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whatwhat say what

  1. whatwhat say what replied to Matsuo Basho's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The only way I can see gc17 not being given a pointy end priority pick is if they somehow win two of their remaining four games AFL will do everything in their power to give them a massive leg up
  2. whatwhat say what replied to Range Rover's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    he's a bit similar to melksham in some ways; impacts with the ball forward of play he's not quick tho
  3. no priority pick!! we could yet finish stone motherless last!
  4. gc17 all over the peptides currently
  5. based on stats alone, it's hard to justify tim smith being an inanimate carbon ruck / forward rod when preuss is younger and needs the experience more IN: may, melksham, preuss, hore OUT: o mac, anb, t smith, j wagner i would personally drop brayshaw and hibberd, but who for? does jkh get a midfield role and hore takes hibb's spot, meaning j-wag holds his spot on the wing? all such average, average players
  6. are cats cooked? edit: no, no they're not
  7. yes, well, i was being facetious - it'd just be 'so melbourne' to finish second last, be shunted to pick 3 (or later) with a priority pick or two being granted to a franchise, and then with our pick get someone who is set to miss the entire year with an acl
  8. just accept it - we're finishing second last and getting pick three there's no way gc17 won't have their priority wish granted; they're an expansion club who need all the leg-ups they can get it's got nothing to do whether our club protests or not - it's irrelevant, because the afl will ALWAYS favour expansion club wishes over protecting the integrity of the competition it would be hilariously typical / awful if we finish second last, get pick three, and pick the bloke who has just done his acl cos he has 'the most upside' rather than going for someone who can immediately impact and play, like a serong or what have you
  9. Itโ€™s going to be...ugly I wonder whether itโ€™s actually the Tiggasโ€™ smalls that I suspect will destroy us Waiting to see how the magoos go tomorrow before thinking about changes But... IN: May, Weed, Dunkley OUT: O Mac, ANB, T Smith Brayshaw should go but I fail to see the point in playing Maynard or JKH, who are the only inside mids left What a glorious season it has been......
  10. 6: Gawn 5: Petracca 4: Harmes 3: Lever 2: Fritsch 1: Frost
  11. LOVED that we we never got a replay of the free to long - i thought it was a perfectly executed tackle and strip from trac
  12. o mac just gives up so, so much legrope
  13. jake carlisle remains one of the dumbest football players ever
  14. atrocious lack of defensive workrate
  15. wow we can't run how unfit are we??
  16. except frost was the match-up then but, really, it's a case of our defenders - other than lever - being atrocious in the air; they just can't read the play whatsoever
  17. too many players give 'one effort' - no secondary workrate whatsoever
  18. yep no one filled the gap which was appalling defensive footy, but the legrope was way too long saints dominated last 5-10 minutes
  19. nah, he liked the post about him being dropped (which is weird enough as it is) not the @shitadelaide comment
  20. trac does so much good stuff and then just won't do the basic and KICK THE FLAMIN' GOAL!!
  21. hibberd is a shadow of his former self
  22. i actually don't think clayton is getting that hard a tag; game is wide open so far - neither team very defensive at all
  23. I donโ€™t believe that
  24. are we sure we want him as an assistant?
  25. bears look like they could get clarko'd, like the cats did last week