daisycutter

will she have to pay back her hush money? i assume she would have signed a confidentiality clause. i haven't followed this one much so i don't really understand the charge. having consensual sex is not a crime. paying someone money to not advertise it is not a crime i wouldn't have thought. so what is the case about in a nutshell, mr leg?

whinging and being aggrieved (even proxy aggrievement) is fast becoming oz's favourite pastime keep up the good work, wcw

can't think of a more irrelevant or misleading stat. things that people do to get a click ... sheesh

keep us informed, but

ComPutEr sAyS nO

CROWS MAKE AUDACIOUS BID TO LURE DANGERFIELD BACK TO ADELAIDE

apparently (and weirdly) the crows are trying to offer dangermouse a big contract to return to radelaide

oh, duh. that's what happens when you miss your medication. now, where was i?

jvr is only 193cm, swl. it's not the '60's you know

" someone on x "......... lol .........classic comedy, jr

what a mf of a game that will be😮 *mf mother filth

well uncle, you should know by now that the abc is just a woke propaganda operation now

i'm sure it's been discussed on some dl thread somewhere, but what's the reasoning for the scats home game being played at the mcg instead of at tpp

you could even say the "DEE-FRIBBLER", guaranteed to bring on a heart attack

i think you mean a sparrow in the hand is worth more than the greene on the other side?

now north being norf

saints being aints

nothing to worry about, mr fence. just your usual stalking and grooming see uncle bitters for more details.

gold

then just hope they break a leg

absolutely then ... tell them to get off our [censored] ground

just a thug act. always was a thug, always will be collingwood legend

mockery is one of the many synonyms for afl

i don't really get the "legitimate football action" argument as some infallible excuse a smother is a legitimate football action ,,, but then so to is a bump a legitimate football action however a reckless football action is not. a reckless bump or smother resulting in high contact/impact are equally not excusable by just claiming them as a football action this football action narrative is just irrelevant rubbish

it's a sin to want the scum to win but a greater sin to want the fllth to win does that make it clearer?