Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Posts

    29,108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. probably. jvr should have jumped in front of him as if attempting a mark but just make sure he "misses"" the ball. otoh, not being paid a free against just compensates for the free not paid to him having his legs clearly taken out when he was just in range on the 50m line on boundary. tough shot i know, but he could have nailed it or got in a short pass.
  2. but he's his own client in reality (even if he hires a barrister, he's still running the show)
  3. or let me put it another way 3 choices - 1. definitely touched 2. maybe touched 3. definitely not touched what should the soft call be for 2.? if it is 1. then why bother going to arc unless it is to check if over the line. In this case obviously not .
  4. but he doesn't have to be "persuaded", just has to be thinking hmm it was close maybe it was touched, player is appealing. says to ump "it might have been touched but i'm not totally sure, we need to check it." ump says to arc "check to see if ball touched, goal umpire thinks it may have been" i.e. soft decision is touched even though he is unsure
  5. and the afl's continual meddling with the rules and failure to better define the rules i've been playing and following footy for longer than you'd care to know and i still don't understand the basic holding the ball/incorrect disposal/illegal tackle rules, let alone the ruck infringement rules. and that's just some of the basic rules.
  6. that was pretty hard to watch no connection, an undisciplined rabble
  7. i thought he was attending the hellfire club annual convention as a guest speaker
  8. hmm ... looked like false teeth to me ... too perfect
  9. you're under the pump now red but we're sticking fat with you caulfield or bust
  10. in which case any filth player is welcome to my 100 yo mother-in-law's tendons
  11. he's as far away as the length of a piece of string simple answer: it's too early to say
  12. caulfield can't build 2 ovals on gosch's
  13. luuurvly sentiments, uncle. i fully concur. i never understand people who question your perceptiveness.
  14. all that just "from the vision"? sheez some of these guys can sure spin things
  15. something to cheer y'all up 68,089 69K next cab off the rank
×
×
  • Create New...