Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. quite. herman's bay is in florida 😂
  2. wrong. from a membership pov there were no reserved member seat entitlements, just ga
  3. yes, but 5 games in and only had 1 home game. plus 3 games interstate.
  4. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    go to fox footy seems mfc has gone to adrian anderson to advocate - g-d only knows why. can't we get a better advocate?
  5. brisbane bears from 1987 brisbane lions from 1996
  6. Um

    daisycutter replied to DeeBlood's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    maybe you are referring to this?
  7. Um

    daisycutter replied to DeeBlood's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    binman, given your hippiness, try replacing the the 'um' with an 'ooommmm' would be much more smoothing and meditative to the listener
  8. daisycutter replied to DEE fence's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    "here's some more big guys"
  9. Um

    daisycutter replied to DeeBlood's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The Umpire Strikes Back
  10. Um

    daisycutter replied to DeeBlood's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    he? you mean they?
  11. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    lol. an afl document that describes the rules. that's real funny, uncle
  12. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    ht, i think those types of actions count more towards the accidental/careless category rather than impact category of course it is impossible to find official documentation on this
  13. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    the point i'm trying to make is that the grading is the key 1. careless vs accidental. forget it. that was the maynard defence and that has been removed for smothers 2. contact not high. forget it , was unambiguously high 3. impact. low vs medium. this is the only arguable grading category the defence needs to focus on this only and keep it simple. impact low is still guilty but attracts a fine not suspension.
  14. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    why not just keep it simple and argue (correctly) that the impact was low. it's not that hard.
  15. i just hope dodoro stays as their recruiting guru, brad scott as their coach, sheedy on their board, and that their coterie mob keep interfering, for ever and ever. what bliss that would be.
  16. daisycutter replied to Billy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    i thought he could have too. but it would have involved him trying to punch the ball with his injured hand at the same time as being collected by big fogarty. it wouldn't have been pretty and he could have really messed up his bad hand (at least). if it was final i'm sure he would have. as it was i was relieved, can't afford to lose him at the moment.
  17. daisycutter replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    curnow 1 mark 1 handball ... that's it
  18. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    we all know pickett needs to curb his aggression. no argument but the question is, in this case was pickett's impact low or medium (as mro claim) if low - fine, if medium 1 week. it was obviously low. These aren't my rules, they are afl's. and this is the reason we must appeal.
  19. daisycutter replied to deanox's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    well if that was classified as medium impact i'd like to see an example of what low impact would be. this is just wrong classification, and on this basis must be appealed. regardless of whatever punishment anyone personally thinks, the afl has a standard set of definitions and corresponding punishments. they can't just deviate from that on a whim or a wish have some b*lls, mfc and support your player's rights to procedural fairness
  20. daisycutter replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    well, essendrug can add at least another 500 days to their last finals win record count. 😂
  21. daisycutter replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    game over already
  22. thought our skills were a bit down last night but not our endeavour. then i realised it was our 3rd game in just 11 days with 2 being interstate. i'll take that any day, and the 3 wins.
  23. should have won by 6 goals .... culture problem?