daisycutter

it's not as simple as that. there are other factors. the cost of running one nfl club is probably more than the cost of running the whole afl, so in finanancial cost measurements the nfl is running the equivalent of 32 afl's. talent pool however is a different issue, like you alluded to. my biggest beef is the odd number of 19 creates more problems such as fixture fairness and extra byes. and with 19 teams there is still only 9 games per week to monetise but the cost of running the whole show goes up by about 5% with no revenue increase (leaving out inflation which affects both costs and revenue)

are you sure it's not svr?

the romsey manor couch or the tv?

i think it might have even been prior to 2020 because didn't a few of them go on to win medals at last olympics?

you must be mixing it up your flagella, uncle

all we want mr fence is just "a liitle bit more"

quadriga has multiple meanings, red. one being "team"

you mean there could be carlton or collingwood "others" and they want to bury it?

obviously they don't like our quadriga

clava non grata, red?

when you find out what makes thing get bigger, please let me know asking for a friend

i think it has lot to do with the success of the college system, plus their recruits are quite a bit older than here college footy is huge. big crowds, lots of publicity and the supporters are hugely invested in the college stars. compare that to here with our u18 competition. average fan has never heard of most of the recruits. no point hyping it up too much here if you don't have a feeder system fans are invested with

crows back line must be weak. norf scored 80+ points, enough to win many games of course, norf don't even have a back line - lol

i've never had an issue either, ethan but then i've never watched kayo

congrats now what do you prefer we call you ... granny, grandma, nan, nanny, nana, seanmháir ... ?

trying to understand afl match scheduling is a good way to damage your mental health but generally speaking it's either money or mates

was on the hf boundary, top rhs of screen last qtr not sure what you mean by "behind the goals"

surprised i haven't seen much in the media about the mark paid to port in last qtr resulting in a goal it had to be a metre over the line with plenty of umps having good vision of it maybe there was a bit of media comment but i've not found any

ah, dbj ... now there's a perfect scapegoat, can always be relied on to stuff something up every game

"lucky" handball? it was the most impressive handball of the game and very deliberate ... watch the replay

and more importantly when you are relaxed and totally unaware his action was the very such sneaky action the afl should want to eliminate should've been 1 week

and broadway productions ... toss in hollywood too

what makes it worse is that it was off the ball, there was no scrapping, just clarry standing there relaxed and he comes in from behind and hits him with clarry never seeing a thing . no heat of the moment thing.

i'd give him another week (good break till next game) then re-evaluate if a period at casey necessary

don't you mean a Scheißkerl? 😎