daisycutter

What, you dont like ? Jacobs to Port Trengrove to Melbourne Warnock to Carlton I'd take that in a heartbeat

I'm FULLY aware of that, doh I just said that he didn't make any reference to any influence from demonland The possibility of the MFC letters on the jumper was obvious to anyone who had an early peek at the emblem that clearer for you

he possibly saw them, but did he like them? nothing to indicate in what he said I'd speculate something based on new emblem or part of it (e.g. MFC letters) or, the new demon logo he alluded to

Umpires NEVER look acceptable, thats why they are umpires Umpires should be heard but not seen

I'd get that TV re-calibrated

except that Breast Cancer one in Pink actually I thought it was going to look quite odd, but after a couple of minutes I found it quite acceptable Colour actually looked like Magenta, and guess what magenta is also called - yes - FUSCHIA PINK/FUSCHIA//MAGENTA Was this our original heritage colour???

I understand the AFL has temporarily reduced the minimum number of draftees per club and will count rookie upgrades as drafts This is due to the reduced number of cattle available due to the Jan-Apr 17 YOs snaffled up by GC17 last year, and to lack of high draft picks available due to GC17's high number of first round picks. Someone here hopefully will respond with the exact numbers

and whites never look good with the red and the blue (Unless you're a scragger of course)

+1

They also may get home ground preferences depending A real home advantage eg MFC vs Essendon at MCG (where MFC finish higher) A pseudo home advantage eg Geelong vs Adelaide at MCG (where Geelong finish higher) No home advantage eg if MFC played Geelong at MCG (where Geelong finished higher)

spot on about middle class welfare . . . but now we're getting serious yes, good luck Sammy Blease (please), he needs a break (oops, sorry)

don't be so touchy chook. just a little off-topic flippant repartee on a very slow demonland afternoon. . . . ah well back to clock watching

always good to have a lot of cannon fodder though, don't you think? or maybe cattle for the filth?

not exactly darwinian is it?

nothing a little gene transplanting and eugenics couldn't fix bit late for fev I fear

Idiocracy - flogs in the future

hmmm, starting to sound like HH and useless eaters

rather depends on your definition of "bad" doesn't it certainly no argument re dumb

I understand he is having the pin(s) taken out of his ankle today Maybe this plus a proper pre-season will make a difference Lets be positive and hope so

Unfortunately it gives no explanation as to how they arrived at a end-of-round-1 selection decision Specifically, whether they took into account his likely 2010 B&F ranking I don't see why they couldn't have waited a few days to find out

It's good to see there are still men of principles

Don't you just hate it when you get eleated?

I thought mono was saying that the final draft picks could be quite different from where they stand now because GC17 have picks 1,2,3.5,7,9,11,13,15,26,43 and they could trade any number of these before the draft to get a better mix of experience (separate from the out-of-contract player rules) Forget Warnock for a moment, this could open up all sorts of possibilities and complexities

What are you talking about? I didn't give any opinion on whether recreational (or other) drug use should or should not be legal/illegal, I said that was for a different forum. I didn't talk about any drug dealer's housemate or any other hypothetical rubbish you can come up with. Go back and read all my posts from the beginning and understand the context I responded to If you want to discuss changing the law then yes, you are off-topic, and no, I'm not saying the law is always correct.

I don't think mono was talking about the GC out-of-contract player trading I think he was saying that they have so many draft picks for draftees that they will be prepared to trade some of those directly for some experienced contracted players from other clubs. They already have a heap of last year 17YO's and they don't want a team of too many last year 17 YO's & this year 18 YO's. hence they might do a lot of direct horse trading to get a better mix of experience/youth.