Redleg

I posted the below on another thread, but was unsure if it could be done. I wonder now if this is the way to get a player from GWS, though they had plenty of chances today to do that sort of deal. "If a player is to be involved it has to be done in the next 97 minutes. Unless you could delist a player who agrees to come to us." I suppose if we named any players, GWS thought them superior to the player they were looking at drafting before Green.

They need to keep enough to pay for Green, so on face value this won't be done now.

Think Freo took him a few years ago, but he never did much.

It is the record, not the little medallion that is important. Anyone can find a lost medal in the street, it doesn't mean they were awarded it.

I haven't been sucked in at all. Read my OP. I am saying this is a way for the AFL to give Jobe back his Brownlow without losing face. I am not going through the whole saga again.

Looking like Bruce deal is about to be done. So he is a domino off the table.

If a player is to be involved it has to be done in the next 97 minutes. Unless you could delist a player who agrees to come to us.

Very good. Was he a Father and Son?

Was he carrying brown paper bags?

GC will take him first.

Speaking of huge deals, what happened to Billy Stretch to GC?

Unfortunately yes, but I didn’t want to call a thread IMO Jobe Watson will get Brownlow back. In my defence though that is how the first line of the thread started, IMO.

IMO the bans penalty, even though served, will not be lifted. As I recall it was like the Tanking penalty for not tanking, it was for bringing the game into disrepute. Given the club still can't tell the players what they were injected with, that will stand.

Yes. No.

See OP.

I get a bit tired coming in from Caulfield.

IMO, with the new material coming forward about ASADA not noting the drug as banned, until 4 months after the Bombers stopped using it, even though it was a WADA banned drug for years, the AFL will find a way to reinstate the Brownlow win of Jobe Watson. This is the loophole needed to reverse the stripping of his win. The other 2 players who won the Brownlow in a tie as runners up, IMO, will also be allowed to keep theirs.

Turning 31 in a few weeks. I would pass. We can do better.

That just seems impossible and it would suggest that Daniher was lying about going to Sydney to retain some privacy and playing with another one of his father's clubs, but rather just wanted to leave the Bombers at all costs.

Are we trading for a runner in the Cup?

Fair enough.

Adding to that could we be chasing Papley with 8, as is being mooted by trade media. Carlton were offering 9 but wanted something back. We could also seek something back. Carlton were talking Swans 2nd rounder. Carlton can't do the deal until Bombers agree on Daniher. 8 is better than 9 as part of the Bombers deal. Papley apparently is not stuck on Carlton, but rather getting back to Victoria. It could all end with us having Papley, Finlayson/Caldwell or another GWS player and 6 and say a pick in the 20's. Then again it could be another unforeseen pick swap. Lastly it could just be us with 3 and 8. Together with Langdon and Tomlinson that would be an amazing trade period for us.

NO.

Then why would we use 6 against them, which is what he suggested?

We haven't got 6, we only get it if we do a deal with GWS.