Redleg

Or your secret herbs and spices.

Because we haven't converted our opportunities, which has probably cost us 5 games. If we converted at league average, we would be at the other end of the ladder. That is our problem, nailing our chances and as part of it, fixing our F50 entry.

Did you hear it from the poster 15 minutes and two posts before yours?😉👏

Good teams win more.

Goody on 360 was as positive on Caulfield as he could be. He said we are closer than ever and we will be at Caulfield and it will be great. He should know what is going on. As I have said often, IT WILL HAPPEN.

Killing it in the VFL, took 14 marks last match and hopefully still wants to be a Demon.

The quicker Caulfield is announced as our home, the better.

Don’t want to ruin your day, but there was a bit of gossip that the Pies are into Ben King. Hopefully that isn’t true.

Happy with that change. Seriously though, have you heard any gossip from the boys, if Kalani has given them any indication he will join them next year? I wont tell anyone.

Repeat that situation in the first game next year and all of us will be very happy.

That is not rumour it’s fact as stated by the club in reports and the media. He actually pledged $3m and had paid up $2.7m when he got into financial trouble and couldn’t pay the last $300k. It is the biggest donation to the MFC in our history and to give him some more credit, he was responsible for us getting the Bentleigh club, which gave us our whole future fund of about $25m on its sale and if I recall correctly, also was involved in getting the Oakleigh club, which we later also got millions for when we quit the Pokies industry. We will get the money for Caulfield, when it’s finally approved fully.

It’s clearly a loss of confidence. A player doesn’t just lose his talent.

A CEO is basically the business manager and he has to be good at running the business. We have seen “fan boys” and “wanna be coaches” before and a good footy CEO doesn’t necessarily have to be an ex jock and if you have a good FD boss, who can run the FD well and report to the CEO, that may be a better result. Think Cameron Schwab and the whiteboard.

2nd and 3rd year blues respectively. They will get back to their best and we know they can play.

How did he present when you interviewed him?

And if he was a fantastic appointment, would you wait a few months, or rather lose him and appoint a lesser person who could start right away?

Bit of angst on DL these days.

.

At least we can all be happy we won’t be losing again this weekend.

I posted that several players have poor second seasons and that Caleb could be another and Kolt could be another too. Very confident about Caleb being a very good player and hopeful that Kolt will be one too.

Samoans speak Samoan and Finns speak Finnish. Neither language is English. What therefore is the reason the AFL are denying us access to a player we have invested some time in, given that they are going to change the rule next year? The Northern teams are being very well looked after and we have already been dudded by this system with Mac Andrew. If we have any interest in Ah Mu and he has a younger brother who has some ability apparently, I would be screaming AFL house down.

A lot of players suffer 2nd year let downs and Caleb might be another.

Agree 100%.

I believe it will happen and am actually happy about the pivot on the site, as I wrote before and have always believed, it is a far better site, giving us a bigger area, with better access, on a corner position, not hemmed in, in an internal sliver of land. It borders the track, with easy access to the inner area, where ovals etc would be situated. It also allows any buildings to be built further from the racecourse grandstand and more out of view from them, obviously on the other side of the track and of course, not interfering with the view of the racetrack. It also allows avoiding shadowing, as it would be on the south side of the racecourse. I don’t think money will be the issue, as we have a decent percentage already committed and the AFL owes us and there will be some Government contribution at some stage, as Caulfield is still an area a Government would want to have, both State and Federally and there is going to be community benefit as part of the project.

He seems to be publicly against it, but he is not the person or part of the authorities in charge of the precinct.